Talk:MGM Macau

Architecture Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gambling Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Macau Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Macau, an attempt to better organize and improve articles related to Macau.MacauWikipedia:WikiProject MacauTemplate:WikiProject MacauMacau articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Image copyright problem with File:MGM Grand logo.png

The image File:MGM Grand logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between this article and the MGM Macau?

Both articles look to me as the same, I would recommend to unite both articles. Tt100 talk 10:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to MGM Macau. The media seem to be picking up the new name, e.g. Reuters, Toronto Star and Macau Daily Times, so I do the WP:IAR on the WP:CRYSTAL. Favonian (talk) 12:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MGM Grand Macau → MGM Macau – The property's name was apparently changed. I couldn't find any info about the rename, but the company website and annual report refer to MGM Macau, as do recent news articles. There was a near-duplicate of this article at MGM Macau that was forked back in 2010. I've merged what little info was in that article and not this one. relisted--Mike Cline (talk) 13:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC) Toohool (talk) 05:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Comment – there's no need to move an article just because of an "official" name change (WP:OFFICIALNAME), so it's a matter of whatever name is used in reliable sources, per WP:COMMONNAME. ENeville (talk) 18:49, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned above, recent news articles have generally used the new name. Toohool (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment A bit more research on the common name would be useful as MGM Grand is still being used by both the media and MGM Resorts --Mike Cline (talk) 13:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The MGM Resorts page you link to is a corporate jobs site, which hardly weighs up against the hotel's web site, the Chinese parent company's site, and the American parent company's site, not to mention their annual reports, all of which use "MGM Macau". The signage on the building was changed from "MGM Grand" to just "MGM" (see [1]). Third-party sources are more of a mixed bag, but "MGM Macau" has the edge, looking only at stories from the last year or so (since the name change was completed). Of the Macau-based English-language sources that I found, all were using "MGM Macau": [2] [3] [4] [5]. Western media sources also have plenty of examples of "MGM Macau", e.g. [6] [7] [8] [9]. There are some that use "MGM Grand Macau", but not as many. All in all, it doesn't take a crystal ball to predict that when a business changes its name, reliable sources will follow. Toohool (talk) 04:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.