Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peta Murgatroyd

Peta Murgatroyd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

as per WP:ONEVENT. only known for her appearance on Dancing with the Stars [1]. and she was eliminated in week 1. LibStar (talk) 06:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- - - KEEP*** Current Rising Fame
Delete - being in the background chorus line of a dance tv show is barely more notable than being an extra in a movie --which is entirely not notable (not even for IMDB!) one appearance on the same show as a dance contestant and being voted off immediately is not notable. being the lead dancer in a show that reached broadway is perhaps somewhat notable maybe. barely. does a lead dancer get to speak any lines? the article sentence which begins "Peta is currently dating..." is actually funny: as if grasping for notability by mentioning her slightly barely notable current boyfriend. Cramyourspam (talk) 15:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Contrary to the above, the subject was promoted from the dance troupe on Dancing with the Stars to become one of the professional dance partners for the last two seasons. While she and her partner were eliminated in the first week, she has nevertheless returned to compete as one of the professional dance partners again this season. With only two exceptions, it appears that every other professional dance partner on the U.S. edition of DWTS has an article on Wikipedia (or at least their names are blue links). I believe her involvement as a professional dance partner on DWTS for two seasons is sufficient to qualify the subject as notable. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Frankly, the nominator not having the right facts at all puts in question whether they would even nominate if they had the right facts. LibStar, could you please be courteous and add a link to this discussion on the article talk page along with teh AFD notice, so people actually come here to vote? Thanks in advance. This person has been a multiple time star on a massive top 10 TV program, and a lead dancer in a Broadway show. The multiple DWTS appearances alone generate massive secondary press on this person, if one cares to look. 76.95.213.142 (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Seriously, what would be the point of removing this article? Are we trying to save electrons? Are we afraid the Wikipedia is going to run out of pages? The Wikipedia currently has nearly 4 million articles and I guarantee you that many of them are less relevant than this one. Who cares? If you don't like the article, then don't read the article. Truthfully, the fact that she placed 3rd in the world at the world famous Latin Championships in at Blackpool, England (2006) would probably be enough for her to have a Wikipedia article, even if she wasn't on a TV show watched by nearly 18 million people, but wait, she is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BruceMount (talk • contribs) 01:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]