Jump to content

User talk:YSSYguy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Latituded610 (talk | contribs) at 14:11, 9 April 2012 (→‎humberside airport: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Return of the Native

That ain't all I'm having trouble keeping down when it comes to him.

*sigh* I'm heading out of the office in a moment - once I get home I'll write something up and see what we can do. Thanks for the tip, as always. Enjoy your trip - here's hoping it's improving. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:BA38 ? MilborneOne (talk) 18:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome back, he might have just walked into your trap! MilborneOne (talk) 19:29, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ruislip

Could you explain your edit summary for your edit of Ruislip in which you reverted my edit? Harrison49 (talk) 23:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coolkenno

I may be wrong, but should this article not be called CoolKenna? (talk) 13:26, 4 November 2011 (GMT)

New Wackett Warrigal article

Hi YSSYguy, another obscure Australian plane article created... the Wackett Warrigal, see what you think... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derekbu (talkcontribs) 09:31, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you are an Australian aviation enthusiast I am intrigued as to why you nominated the above for a SD. It would seem to me to be in a similar vein to an article you created de Bruin Air. Regards Paste Let’s have a chat. 09:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation Wikiproject on Commons?

Hey mate, I've had an idea of starting an Aviation WikiProject on Commons. I have created a page at Commons:User talk:Russavia/Proposal where I hope that if other editors think this is a good idea, we can all come up with ideas, etc. Please keep all comments on that page for time being, and if you know of other editors on Commons or on other language projects who might be interested in commenting, coming up with ideas, etc, please let them know of the discussion. Let's see if this could be a workable project. Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 23:38, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:53, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

A kitten for you!

For the good work you do related to photographs. :D Some of your contributions found on your user page are fantastic!

LauraHale (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, YSSYguy. You have new messages at The Bushranger's talk page.
Message added 00:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The Bushranger One ping only 00:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Hello, we are the chartered exporter for Chinese utility aircraft Y-12. I noticed the photo of Harbin Y-12 is uploaded by you. Could you add the website for this aircraft www.y-12.com.cn to its wiki page(aircraft type part)? I tried but did not success. Aerolimin (talk) 07:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You did a major cleanup[1] on this article two years ago but the biggest problem with it was still there. The cause of the crash was totally wrong. 'A greater than allowable blood alcohol level of the pilot.' was said to be a major cause. ASN had the right info[2] and the article had a link to the accident report with the causes. I double checked(with Google translate) the alcohol level and two news reports said it was high because the pilot's body decomposition. The accident report doesn't list it as a cause anyway.

I don't blame you but rather the 13-year-old editor[3] who slandered the dead pilot for almost three years....William 00:21, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

humberside airport

Good afternoon

I am new to wiki, but not to Humberside airport and made some relevant and correct changes the other day which I see you have deleted.

Clearly you are more experienced at editing than I am, however, the changes I have made are correct and up todate. I work for MAG within the senior management team and whilst I dont want the page to become an advertorial for the airport, some of the information casts a rather negative view.

The overall pax number reduction is a fact, but its also a fact that the significant reduction during 2011 was the h4u collapse. The ryan air fall out with Alicante is also fact, yet the commentary seem slightly biased, indicating in my view that Humberside had lost out because of something within their own control.

KLM figures are correct and its important to note that the increase is significant vs the previous year.

I have amended the FBO detail, as Weston are now operating. The nightel operation can only deal with able bodied gas rig workers (some oil, but very limited) as it is not a commercial operation available to any and all that would like to stay there. No disabled access, or twin rooms, children etc are currently able to stay there. This is because its focused on only offshore workers and, as such, those with reduced mobility or some form of physical disability cannot work offshore for safety reasons.

The helicopter movements are now just above 1000 per month and, with new contracts in place, these will increase to over 1250 per month from June/July of this year. Again a very important point to note, relative to the reduction in tour operator flights.

With regards to Doncaster airport, again the view on the Humberside page is that the competition and flight choice is greater. I would argue that more information needs displaying on the full range of flights from HUY for people to make up their own mind. The reduction in all tour operator flights at regionals should be mentioned, in my view, rather than just focusing on the HUY reduction.

Would welcome your thoughts.

regards