Talk:Agni-V

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India C‑class High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Indian / South Asia B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Rocketry C‑class Low‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A news item involving Agni-V was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 19 April 2012.

Wikipedia

Agni 5 test in near future

the editors may like to see this soucrce http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/article2943351.ece --Ðℬig XЯaɣ 19:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow's Launch

Hi, I was thinking of proposing tomorrow's test launch on ITN (if successful). So the update based on the test launch will have to be included. Just wanted to get a feeler if the update can be included as a new section. I'm also tweaking the "preparation for testing" section a bit. Chocolate Horlicks (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've made some changes, but dont know for real if the test is tomorrow for sure. Some sources still say between 18 to 20. Chocolate Horlicks (talk) 11:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oribital ranges picture

Why does the range picture have a "dent" in the top-right corner of the range? Why isn't it a near-perfect circle? Lugnuts (talk) 07:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The missile can be launched from anywhere in Indian which goes further in the North-West then the North-East. 86.168.155.251 (talk) 14:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reactions

The US does not "refute" Chinese as a reaction. This rather sounds like a Indian PoV.

Reference

I have found this absolutely arrogant and hilarious statement made by China as a response to India's missile launch. Here it is. I'll start adding info in a new section now. ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 08:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the article above is amusing of course but i dont think we need to elaborate china's reaction to such a large extent. -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 10:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess I got carried away by the sheer comic relief I got by seeing the Chinese state reactions; however, even generally, it has to be noted that China made veiled threats and a lot of stupid claims, so we should elaborate a bit. My 2 cents. ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 10:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the official chinese reaction here [1]-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 13:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
and the official US reaction [2] -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 15:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow ... did China hire some PR folks from North Korea? Nice job on the reactions. I wouldn't go too much further in the article - you've got the reference added and readers can go there for the full reaction. Ravensfire (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is important for one to understand that Global Times is NOT an official mouth piece of the Chinese government, and its editorial views are just editorial views of a news paper, which is one of the most hawkish news papers in the country.