This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
A fact from Study Club fire appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
There's really nothing here to do with the aftermath. A reference in a 1971 safety manual seems a desperate stretch, and noting that there are not many reliable sources of information violates WP:OR. An institution categorizing damage as "significant" doesn't really count as aftermath. It's just a description, and a vague one. Any opposition to deletion? InedibleHulk (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
opposed The NFPA description is just fine as an aftermath to add some significance without stretch, you can look for other sources if you want to improve the section; rather than deleting it. Ottawa4ever (talk) 12:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
