Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JarlaxleArtemis

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 85.81.20.149 (talk) at 17:03, 18 June 2012 (→‎Comments by other users). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Jose.medez248

Jose.medez248 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
Please note that a case was originally opened under JarlaxleArtemis (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jose.medez248. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jose.medez248.

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

11 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets



This user registered at 23:32 yesterday and almost immediately began to revert edits made by Vice regent. At the moment, the user has exactly seven edits (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7). Except for #7, which added a small template to the same page as #6, all of these edits are reversions of recent edits made by Vice regent. When you create an account and make all of your edits to revert one established editor (and use your edit summaries to attack that editor), you're obviously not a brand new user. I have no suspected sockmaster, but I've been told in respect to accounts such as Nyttendsucks that an obvious attack account is by itself grounds for CU and isn't at all fishing. This account can obviously be blocked for disruptive socking, but we really should find the sockmaster if possible. Nyttend (talk) 04:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Looking at the contributions of Jose.medez248, he looks more like a sockpuppet than a master. Or were some of his contributions deleted?VR talk 12:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sockmaster determination, in many cases, is based on the registration date of the accounts. Jose.medez248 was registered on May 29 and the rest were registered in June. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Yup, someone's obviously on the warpath. The oldest account I saw, i.e. the master, was Jose.medez248 (talk · contribs). Here are his  Confirmed socks:

 IP blocked. WilliamH (talk) 04:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, talk about a fast response. Thanks for the help! Nyttend (talk) 04:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Case renamed as suggested. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • All already blocked, now tagged, so closing. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
11 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


the user continues the edit war started by the banned anti-muslim user mirahmet.hyraidabassa here, [1]. highly suspicious.  altetendekrabbe  17:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Go for it. You will be disappointed i am afraid :) However, I would like to report this users use of foul language such as "racist" and "idiot" in his edit summaries. Also he just remove peoples comments on his personal discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.81.20.149 (talk) 17:38, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i can remove any comment from my page. period. on the other hand, you removed another user's comment here [2]. that is not allowed. after i reverted you at the counterjihad page [3], you stalked me and continued the edit war started by the *banned* editor. you're either a sock or a stalker.-- altetendekrabbe  17:48, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It shuold be more acceptable to remove rude personal attacks like the above, than removing warnings from a personal discussion page. It sure makes it appear that you got a lot to hide, doing that. Other than that, there is nothing suspecious about me getting interested in the behavior of a person who makes blind reverts and hysterical comments and attacks when addressing other people. -- 85.81.20.149 (talk) 17:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
12 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


obvious sock. continues the edit wars of other socks of jose.medez.  altetendekrabbe  06:06, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Zander Christine (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Another with the same edit summaries. Chris857 (talk) 01:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note I've also blocked a number of accounts. Elockid (Talk) 01:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is Grawp, the report for today. Could a clerk merge/copy over this with Grawp's case. Elockid (Talk) 03:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/JarlaxleArtemis&oldid=498205642"