Jump to content

Talk:Timeline of events associated with Anonymous

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.181.139.217 (talk) at 09:10, 7 July 2012 (→‎Add?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconInternet culture Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Operation UFC

I heard that anonymous are attacking the ufc site for supporting sopa: just some references http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15IRZdEUO20&feature=player_embedded http://espn.go.com/mma/story/_/id/7510920/hackers-disrupt-ufc-online-second-attack-website http://mmaweekly.com/challenge-accepted-hackers-attack-ufc-president-dana-white

Operation Mayhem

Operation Mayhem is a current going Operation that involves the Guy Fawkes Virus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDamox (talkcontribs) 00:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa GOP worried by hacker threat to caucus vote "With two weeks left before Iowa's first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses, the Iowa Republican Party is taking steps to secure its electronic vote collection system after receiving a mysterious threat to its computers. (Dec. 19), from USA Today

99.181.143.108 (talk) 04:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Iowa Republican caucuses, 2012 specifically. 99.19.43.221 (talk) 03:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Iowa GOP Ups Protection Against Hacker Attack Wednesday, December 28, 2011 by Steffen Schmidt, IAFC Blogger on WNYC. 99.181.147.68 (talk) 08:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

resources

Stratfor#2011 Hacking 99.181.143.108 (talk) 04:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More Questions About Motives Behind Stratfor Hack by NICOLE PERLROTH New York Times December 27, 2011, 6:31 PM
99.190.86.5 (talk) 06:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
From WSJ, 'Anonymous' Hackers Target U.S. Security Think Tank December 27, 2011 Associated Press. 09:48, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Currently called Stratfor#2011 hacking incident — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.19.45.81 (talk) 12:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(od) Here or there or somewhere? Finding the Cleanup Crew After a Messy Hack Attack by Nicole Perlroth published Nytimes.com December 29, 2011 and in-print on December 30, 2011, on page B1 of the New York edition; regarding computer forensics and Mandiant. 99.109.125.85 (talk) 00:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Stratfor hack is much more than file copies, and their website only came back online Jan 12, 2012. From http://thehackernews.com/2012/01/stratfor-back-online-after-hack-with.html Chief Executive George Friedman said in a message to Stratfor's subscribers: "Early in the afternoon of Dec. 24, I was informed that our website had been hacked again. The hackers published a triumphant note on our homepage saying that credit card information had been stolen, that a large amount of email had been taken, and that four of our servers had been effectively destroyed along with data and backups." As to the post declaring that Anonymous didn't do the Stratfor hack, who is to know who is Anonymous and who isn't. That is an important point to be stressed. (To me Anonymous is more like a wave packet than anything else I can think of to describe it.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArishiaNishi (talkcontribs) 18:38, 12 January 2012 (UTC) oops, forgot my sig ArishiaNishi (talk) 18:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

resource?

  • People's Liberation Front (group), which is associated with hacking groups such as Anonymous. AP Photo/Arturo Rodriguez (2010-04-07). "FBI Arrests Suspected LulzSec And Anonymous Hackers". Fox News. Retrieved 2011-12-20.

from People's Liberation Front disamb. page. 99.181.131.214 (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews resource

{{Wikinews|US government, music industry websites taken offline in web attack}} 99.35.14.75 (talk) 02:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blackouts

Under the Operation Blackout header, it's stated that Google shut down every service except its search engine. Can anyone confirm this? I'm fairly certain this didn't happen (although the censored Google logo and informative pages on SOPA/PIPA did). Musicaljelly (talk) 09:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why was Operation BART section removed?

In August 2011, in response to Bay Area Rapid Transit's shutdown of cell phone service in an attempt to disconnect protesters from assembling non-violently in response to a police shooting, Anonymous sent out a mass email/fax bomb to BART personnel and organized multiple mass physical protests at the network's Civic Center station.[1]

99.181.155.14 (talk) 03:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube porn day in May, 2009

Why no mention of it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.162.121.235 (talk) 10:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

miss padania

they hacked the site of Miss Padania — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.74.111.209 (talk) 14:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arrests

Would it be alright to expand the article to include more details on each time the members of Anonymous, AntiSec and Luzsec are taken into custody? This news article would be a good start: http://www.firstpost.com/tech/anonymous-case-hacker-sabu-was-an-fbi-plant-for-months-236968.html FF3TerraAndLocke (talk) 06:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsubstantiated claims removed

I reverted recent edits by an anonymous user because they appear to be original research using sources that make no mention of Anonymous and one pastebin.com source which is itself a wholly unreliable source because anyone can create a pastebin file. The anonymous editor geolocates in Malaysia and has also added similar unsupported synthesis to Phobos-Grunt. -84user (talk) 15:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 08:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Timeline of events involving AnonymousTimeline of events associated with Anonymous – Anonymous is reported to be involved, but does know the group is "involved"? An alternative title might use reported, etc ... 99.181.147.96 (talk) 03:48, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support The occurrence of other groups claiming affiliation with Anonymous makes any claims of ours about "involvement" potentially dangerous. --BDD (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Declaration of Revolution

I've not heard of this organisation until a couple of days ago when I had an email purporting to be from them titled "Declaration of Revolution" and talking about an occupation of the UK Houses of Parliament and US Congress in December. If it is from them we need to add it to the timeline. Paul MacDermott (talk) 22:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is getting long, suggest breaking into years?

Suggest starting with new page for this year, Timeline of events associated with Anonymous#2012. 99.109.127.232 (talk) 22:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

independence hall tea party hack

As far as I know, whoever posted the admin username and password of the independence hall tea party sites never identified themselves as a member of Anonymous.

The source given for this section of the article doesn't quote anyone encouraging people to "Fuck shit up", nor does it mention Anonymous; it does mention 4chan, but Anonymous and 4chan are not one and the same. Homurssui (talk) 02:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have removed that section as it was unsupported by the given cite. I would urge editors to properly follow WP:V and WP:RS. -84user (talk) 05:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add?

99.181.139.217 (talk) 09:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Poeter, Damon (2011-08-15). "Anonymous BART Protest Shuts Down Several Underground Stations | News & Opinion". PCMag.com. Retrieved 2011-08-30.