User talk:Peridon
Just in case anyone wants to talk to me.... Peridon (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Back numbers of this magazine can be found at: User talk:Peridon/Archives/2008/November User talk:Peridon/Archives/2009/May User talk:Peridon/Archives/2010/February User talk:Peridon/Archives/2010/January
The rest of this is archived somewhere. There's a nice little bot comes in and tidies up. (Could do with one at home...) Not quite sure where it puts the stuff, but I'm working on it... Meantime, copy one of the above and change the date to suit - or look at the little archive box that Jean Calleo gave me.
Please add messages at the bottom of the page so I can find them. Thanks. Do put a heading inside == == and sign with ~~~~. If you don't get a reply from me (or one of the stalkers...) within a reasonable time, you've probably not read this. If you have read it and ignored it, it's your own fault. If you haven't read it, READ IT NOW. Another reason to post at the bottom is that if you post at the top and someone else posts at the bottom, I'll see their message, but won't suspect there's another. Up to you. Ignore this if you want. Just don't blame me.
June 2012 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
A cookie for you!
Gordon Sargent
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Daria Adamantina
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
S K News Portal
Why did you delete the page S K News Portal? For what reason? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prince.aliabbas (talk • contribs) 19:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Unambiguous advertising. One small bit saying what it is, and a lot telling people how to get it. Sorry, but that's not what Wikipedia is for. This is an encyclopaedia, not a directory. You have to show that the subject is of note (see WP:CORP and/or WP:WEB and prove it with references (WP:RS. You cannot use your own site to show notability, nor any blogs, forums or wikis, or places like PRWire or AboutUs. If you can do this, contact a regular editor or admin and ask for an opinion. Peridon (talk) 19:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
Sparlock
No, Sparlock is not a toy. It doesn't exist. It is a metafictional plot device in a cartoon. The article is ostensibly a commentary about the Watch Tower Society. To clarify, the only exposure the fictional character has had has been on web forums after unauthorised exposure of the character on youtube, and a subsequent meme that has not had coverage in reliable sources. Web content falls well within the applied speedy deletion criteria.--Jeffro77 (talk) 12:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- I understood it was on DVD - which doesn't come under A7. As it seems contentious, I'd recommend AfD for it. Peridon (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps. But the DVD isn't about Sparlock. As far as the subject of the DVD goes, the fictional toy is nothing more than an ancillary plot device. The purported significance of the fictional toy itself is purely the result of an internet meme, and certainly unintended by the producers of the film.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Sasson Sarooei
Why did you delete page on Sasson Sarooei? The article was well-written and was for a notable person, with many contributions in field of IT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.89.214 (talk) 11:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Did I? Can't remember the name or find it under that title. I'll look again. Peridon (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Looked back through a month of my deletions (about 500) and didn't see it. If you post here while signed in, I can find it in your deleted contributions (assuming you were the author). Being well written doesn't come into speedy deletion. The main reasons I delete are advertising and/or lack of shown significance. That's by our definitions, by the way. Peridon (talk) 18:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
This is the page: Sasson Sarooei — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.52.145 (talk) 05:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Sorry, I can't see notability. I can see a highly promotional piece about someone who is marketing some software (which has no references to show that that is notable either). Please read WP:SPAM about advertising, WP:NPOV about neutral point of view, WP:BIO about biographies (and if applicable, WP:AUTOBIO as well), and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove any claims of notability. As it stood, the whole article looked as if it had come straight from a PR department or other advertising place. Peridon (talk) 10:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Deletion review for Aleksandrs Čekulajevs
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Aleksandrs Čekulajevs. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Joke and Dagger
Are you really sure this is a good search term for Spy vs. Spy? How? --PRProgRock (talk) 19:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)