Talk:Kogan.com
Appearance
Australia Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
POV concerns
It read like an ad for Kogan because a PR company wrote it. Complete with more references than a PhD. thesis. I'm surprised they didn't add prices too. 14.202.132.63 (talk) 10:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Why does this page read like an ad for Kogan? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.0.159.16 (talk) 06:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- i've trimmed the POV. even the controversies section paints Kogan in a positive light. multiple references are direct from Kogan's website so hardly independent. LibStar (talk) 07:01, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Seems neutral now. The links to Kogan are just links to external articles hosted on their site - but not all positive. (202.60.90.22 (talk) 00:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC))
- POV yes, advert yes. There's multiple serious concerns with this article, including the POV which I've tagged. Is there is an editor who has a WP:COI here? please can you disclose that as per that guideline. Widefox (talk) 11:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps it is because Kogan is my fathers company. I have 4 Kogan TVs (wall-mounted) and they are great at an awesome price. Cheers Subi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subi (talk • contribs) 07:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)