Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/salad

Salad

Nice, appetizing image.

Support Self Nom. --Fir0002 www 12:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Food seems to be opposed a lot, but this is a good image. Nice and crisp. --liquidGhoul 13:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, I just noticed Image:Salad platter.jpg, which is heaps better. I Support it, although it needs some cropping from the top and bottom. --liquidGhoul 00:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Sorry. The foreground is empty, and the elements in the background (the mug and the bread) are distracting. Dr Zak 13:51, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Image:Salad platter.jpg. Mmmmh! Dr Zak 01:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Opp agree with Dr Zak. Will support if they are removed. chowells 14:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. The background has distracting elements. Good resolution, the subject is well prepared and contributes well to its article. --Pharaoh Hound 17:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support of both versions. Much improved. The "salad platter" looks fake (for some odd reason), however it probably is more encyclopedic. I like the close-up view of the cropped one, but it may be too close cut, and the distracting elements -though mush less visible- are still there. --Pharaoh Hound 13:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak support~~ - could someone crop some white space out of the front though, and maybe out of the back? Stevage 18:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support the "salad platter" (full view of plate). Stevage 20:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opppose I found the burnt out foreground and the blurry background too irritating - Adrian Pingstone 20:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. It is a nice appetizing image, I find the blank foreground jarring, and the cropped sides as well. I do like the bread and mug, though.--ragesoss 21:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've uploaded a cropped version. If you want to see other versions: Image:Salad platter.jpg, Image:Cold meat salad.jpg --Fir0002 www 23:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The cropped version is difficult to put into perspective because it's so cut off. I'd say Image:Salad platter.jpg is the most encyclopedic. bcasterline t 23:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer the totally uncropped version. Not sure why you were trying to keep the bread out of the original one :) Stevage 09:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh there're two different shots (obviously of the same thing). I just perfered to close up one. I don't know why but I'm really partial to that white "clean" look which I think the first one really has. To my mind it's a nearly perfect stock shot. But that's just me :-) --Fir0002 www 09:28, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Image:Salad platter.jpg. bcasterline t 01:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support for Image:Salad platter.jpg (those sun dried tomatoes look too nice), although I might suggest the description on the image page is expanded somewhat... —Vanderdecken∴∫ξ φ 10:13, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Image:Salad platter.jpg. Redquark 18:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support the cropped version. More food pics, please! Bertilvidet 15:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Image:Salad platter.jpg. I like seeing the whole context. howch e ng {chat} 16:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The salad platter. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 15:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support any of them, they're pretty good for food pictures. --Lewk_of_S e rthic _contrib ^talk 20:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, Don't like the white backround, it doens't look appetising and I eat salad a few times a week -- BWF89 02:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]