Jump to content

User talk:Reaper Eternal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ethicalv (talk | contribs) at 23:58, 11 December 2012 (Re mangina). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Userpage

Talkpage

Articles Worked On

Current Article

Public Sandbox

Barnstars

Console

See archiving a talk page for more information.
Archives

Jazzster786

Thanks for the quick attention to the SPI. — Bdb484 (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mangina

You deleted the article I submitted for creation and appeared to call it "vandalism". If so I ask that you justify labeling my efforts as "vandalism". The article was a good faith representation of the usage of the term "mangina" in the collection of hundreds of websites called the manosphere which is viewed by millions of users around the world collectively. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mangina. I'm quite certain I was neutral and represented the manospheres usage without expressing any opinion for or against usage of the term. (Deletion log); 18:51 . . Reaper Eternal (talk | contribs) deleted page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mangina ‎(G3: Vandalism) Ethicalv (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That article was complete nonsense: "[Manginas] may discuss males with terms such as testosterone poisoning" or "Mangina can refer to men who are aligned with feminist extremists and are very unkind to the feelings and struggles facing males." It was sourced largely to uncyclopedia, urban dictionary, "dumpyourwifenow.com", and "tiredblackman.com". Please don't recreate that page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If it wasn't clear that I did not make those changes to my submission you're referring to as "complete nonsense", I will tell you again now. I did not make any of those changes to the submission you're referring to. The article I submitted contained none of that text you quoted above. I defend my documentation of the term "mangina", though I accept that it may need to be expanded, and I ask that you remove the label of "vandalism" if you have attached that to either me or my post. Ethicalv (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate Group

Hi, thanks for your work on this case. I already nominated the blocked sock's article for a G5. Perhaps you missed that? Can you act on the G5 nomination, as an admin? Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else already has. I didn't really want to immediately G5 it since Cindamuse (talk · contribs) had done some work trying to clean it up. Thanks anyway. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for protecting my userpage. That said, unless there's a policy against it, or you're worried I'm costing the project serious RCP resources, would you mind unprotecting it? My philosophy's always been that if it keeps the trolls out of mainspace, they can call me a faggot all they want till they get themselves blocked. I chuckle, stalk their contribs until an admin steps in, and add a few tallies to my vandalism userbox. I've also had a few times where I couldn't tell if an editor was vandalizing or just incompetent, and some all-caps changes to my page answered my question very easily, and led me and the blocking admins to cut them a lot less slack.

(I see no reason to lift the move-protection, though, for the record. Someone who gets stopped from moving my page will, I imagine, just vandalize it instead.) — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) 22:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, there's a well-liked IP who frequents Drmies's talk page. Pending changes, perhaps? — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) 20:38, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've unprotected your userpage and semiprotected Drmies's talk page. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:44, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agh, sorry, that's what I get for speaking in cool short sentences: The above was in response to your semi-protection of Drmies page. As in, perhaps it would be better to switch to PC so IP 99 can comment? — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) 20:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Protection and IP reverts

Haha, yes, it gets complicated sometimes. I almost did the same thing earlier. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:38, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, oops. That was the reason for the dummy edit. :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:44, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

Re: Mangina

(This comment repeated above) If it wasn't clear that I did not make those changes to my submission you're referring to as "complete nonsense", I will tell you again now. I did not make any of those changes to the submission you're referring to. The article I submitted contained none of that text you quoted above. Please restore the submission so that I can see which editor vandalized it. I defend my documentation of the term "mangina", though I accept that it may need to be expanded, and I ask that you remove the label of "vandalism" if you have attached that to either me or my post. Ethicalv (talk) 23:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reaper_Eternal&oldid=527620482"