User talk:Danger

If you have come to enquire about my removal of a username from Category:Wikipedia usernames with possible policy issues, please read this first.

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.

Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please do not post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.

If a message requires my immediate attention, or a few days have gone by and I haven't answered, please post a message here in some form so that the big yellow bar attracts my attention. I am somewhat like a crow.

Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
To start a new conversation on this page click on this link.
You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Archives

January – April 2008
May – June 2008
July – December 2008
January – February 2009
June – July 2009
August 2009 – June 2010
July 2010 – 26 January 2011
26 January – June 29
June 30 – October 26
October 27 – March 2012
April – present

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Actually,

On the removal of the alleged 'harassment'. He is my best friend, we wrote it together for a school Wikipedia reliability project. Though we have succeeded in proving the uptight maintenance of Wikipedia by its users, we can and WILL not guarantee the ceasing of future edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewnicorn592 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re uptight maintenance: You're welcome. Remember the next time you're cribbing paragraphs for your term papers off of Wikipedia, it's uptight people who make sure that you're not turning in a paper replete with random insertions of "penis" and "poo". Danger ^{High voltage!} 05:43, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this as I was working my way to the bottom. ;o) Very nicely phrased. My favorte might be the since-removed spam verbiage in the IBM Blue Genie-line Top 500 (or 100?) supercomputer. The defacement (vandalism?) said that that the O/S it ran on was Windows 95. I giggle at that just thinking about it! Oh, and the talk page for the somewhat silly 68-95-99 article (or is it 67.6-96.4-99.? article?) has a silly joke about being a 3-smegma outlier. --FeralOink (talk) 03:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article that you cleaned up

This is terribly sketchy. I just wanted you to know that you did a good job on that British rock band Afc which I rejected. I wanted to let you know that I left a message for the author, user Barry Shrimpton, with much more detail about what I was objecting to, as I didn't realize the problem with the 31 seemingly missing reference links that weren't truly missing. I am in a very big hurry right now, must empty dishwasher and cook dinner else will be in trouble. Sorry for brevity, dropped articles! --FeralOink (talk) 05:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I had to do a double take; I've never seen references listed like that, but, oh well. Thanks for leaving Shrimpton a note. Good luck with the dinner; if you celebrate Christmas, merry Christmas to you. Danger ^{High voltage!} 16:38, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the useful feedback

Just wanted to say thank you for pointing me in the right direction and providing some quality feedback. Appreciate you and your work! AChrisTurner (talk) 18:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. If you do decide to write about the case, WikiProject SCOTUS cases has a WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases/Style guide that might be relevant to you. Most of the text you've already written seems like it could be copied over into a new article. Danger ^{High voltage!} 18:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like something I would like to do. I will research a few more secondary references and change the focus. AChrisTurner (talk) 19:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Morabito scheme

I have inserted 2 sources. can be published now? Thanks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Morabito_scheme — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.54.36.65 (talk) 20:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the word "Morabito" doesn't even appear in your first reference, no. You have to provide sources that actually talk about the topic. Danger ^{High voltage!} 23:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]