User talk:Areaseven

Welcome, Areaseven!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions!
You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself.
You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.
I would suggest a look through our policies and guidelines.
If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum.
I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions.

- Zapptastic at 04:56, Thursday, August 15, 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

Just want to give you a personal thanks for your additions and revisions to the page for the Journey album, Revelation. Always nice to see fellow contributors. 4RM0 (talk) 13:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Films invite

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Films? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Collectonian

-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a noteYou may want to take a look at three images you uploaded, File:VF-1S-Strike-Valkyrie-02.jpg, File:VF-1S-Strike-Valkyrie-01.jpg, and File:VF-1S-Strike-Valkyrie-03.jpg, then take a look at how they fall under Template:Non-free 3D art. These images don't qualify for release under a free license unless you get the permission of the manufacturer of the toys. However, they do qualify for fair use, as the aforementioned template states. I was made aware of these photos as a result of a request in the IRC wikipedia help chat, so any questions can be directed towards me (on my talk page), #wikipedia-en-help ^connect, or via Template:Helpme. Thanks, Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 17:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]What's the tag code for said template? - Areaseven (talk) 00:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]It is explained in Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline, but to be honest, it is usually easier to find another, similar image and see how they did it. For example, File:Ultramagnus-universe3.jpg, File:Armada-thundercracker-zapmaster.jpg. Note, you will need to use a {{Non-free 3D art}} thingy and a {{Non-free use rationale}}. Hope that helps; if you need more help with it, put a {{helpme}} on this page, or talk to us live, with this. Chzz ► 15:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Okay, done. Thanks. - Areaseven (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Re: Mega Shark articlesThanks, Areaseven! I'll add the sequel to my watchlist. — Hunter Kahn 14:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Re: New Title to GuardWow, that movie looks like a winner! lol. I've added it to my watchlist and will keep an eye on it. — Hunter Kahn 03:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]By the way, I'd like to invite you to sign my autograph book. I don't specifically invite people to do so unless I have some sort of positive wiki-experience with them, and in this case I've been extremely impressed with your efforts to protect the Asylum pages. — Hunter Kahn 16:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]Vandals/IncidentsWP:ANV to report. CTJF83 chat 02:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Incident Board - Areaseven (talk) 12:35, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Survey for new page patrollersNew page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Areaseven! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP SurveyDelivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]108.196.86.132Thanks for the report^[1] you made at the Administrator intervention against vandalism noticeboard about this IP address. I can see that the edits this person's made to the Transformers: The Ride article are, at best, unhelpful but they don't look like vandalism as we define it so I have declined to block this IP. I've asked the person to discuss any future edits on the talk page before making them to the article. I hope this will work. As an admin, I don't really have a mandate to block folks that make bad edits if they're not truly vandalism. At least, I don't have such a mandate until they've exhausted multiple attempts at collaboration and discussion. Thanks for your work maintaining our article quality.--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]Good luck on getting a response from him. - Areaseven (talk) 01:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]I'm not optimistic, either, and I'm sorry to give you the runaround. If he doesn't use the talk page before his next edit, please leave me a note on my own talk page and I'll push him harder. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]Well, I can tell you right now that 108.196.86.132 and 68.4.7.52 are one and the same person, as both IP addresses point out to Irvine, California, at the exact same coordinates (IP Latitude: 33.6695; IP Longitude: -117.8231). Furthermore, I have reason to believe that both IP users are the recently-blocked Cflores29. - Areaseven (talk) 03:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]I've now blocked this person's IPs several times. Let me know if the problem returns. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]I'm SorryI'm sorry okay. This is not a bad spelling. I'm sorry. --67.218.53.224 (talk) 09:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]