User talk:Maunus
NLP
I responded to your comments on Encycotadd's talk page to provide a little context. I've also largely supported your proposals on the NLP talk page. I think the PoV tag is not necessary as the current wording has been agreed, however I am leaving it for the moment as I think we can reach agreement on something more sustainable. If you check the talk page history, proposals to move the "discredited" word subject to an agreement on a stable form of words were rejected by the meat farm. ----Snowded TALK 07:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Snowded, I can see that now the Sockflood has started and the RfC is likely to degenerate into nonsense. I think that if this is the case the only sane solution is to let the POV tag stand because the article really is very biased in the way it is written and reads like wikipedia trying to tell the reader what to think about the topic. It just is not NPOV - but you may be right that there is a good reason it is not. But as long as it is non-neutral it needs the tag. There are many articles that require permanent POV-tags on the wikipedia, and it seems to me like this may well be one of them. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 03:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Disagree I'm afraid on the PoV and I'm not letting that stand as its in part the goal of the meat farm. If you check we have enough support on the second alternative and the other two and I suggest we make the changes. The new ID's are just repeating their instructions (more or less identical requests) and LTMem is a clear sock puppet so I think I will pull in the admin who banned the last one if they give any more trouble. I was waiting for Lam to respond as he is one of the other main editors with considerable knowledge of the field. Make the change ... ----Snowded TALK 07:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Howdy. Be careful of your indenting in discussions, as you're going 1-indent too far, with your responses :) GoodDay (talk) 04:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Why can't ignorant bigots understand it's just a Social Construct?
Hi, I've watching you deal with the racists and I want to say you are a brave individual standing up to the political establishment. Looking at this photo of Nigerian and Kenyan women[1] you can quite clearly see that the variation goes in clines such the the Kenyans would be confused with Egyptians half the time. That's obvious from several numbers calculated from the genome. Keep up the good work! 115.21.210.178 (talk) 14:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)