User talk:Walter Görlitz/Archived Talk to 2013-04
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Archives
|
Archive 1 to 2007-01-30 |
Archive 2 to 2010-03-31 |
Archive 3 to 2010-06-28 |
Archive 4 to 2010-10-31 |
Archive 5 to 2011-01-31 |
Archive 6 to 2011-04-30 |
Archive 7 to 2011-06-30 |
Archive 8 to 2011-09-30 |
Archive 9 to 2011-12-31 |
Archive 10 to 2012-04-30 |
Archive 11 to 2012-08-31 |
Archive 12 to 2012-12-31 |
Happy New Year 2013
![]() |
Happy New Year 2013 |
I know that previous interactions between you and me weren't as good as they should have been, and I apologize again for being harsh and blunt sometimes. Notwithstanding, I just wanted to wish you a Happy New Year for 2013 :) — ΛΧΣ21 20:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks. And the same in return. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Canada page
Could I get you to revert the tag addition at the Canada page - its on pages 20 - 28 - the book Gregg Lee Carter (3 June 2006). Gun Control in the United States: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 267. ISBN 978-1-85109-760-9. Retrieved 2 January 2013. - talks about the book in question referring specifically about the views on gun control...thus a cross ref confirming the books mention of this topic. PS Happy new years!!Moxy (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Feel free to remove it after adding your reference, which isn't the one listed (and I didn't think it was, hence the tag). --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok i will - They even go so far as to talk about pellet guns (a review).Moxy (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- I noticed that. Thanks for checking. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
You may want to have your say.HotHat (talk) 05:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONCACAF Fourth Round
Those are local times. Honduras is in UTC−6, Panama is in UTC−5, Mexico City is currently in UTC−6. Chanheigeorge (talk) 06:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Spaces
Readability.
- — Lgfcd (talk) 20:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- When you're done, I'll be removing them then. If it's not prescribed and several tools remove them, it's not appropriate to add it. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
GONE
I have retired!HotHat (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sad to see you go.
- May the road rise up to meet you.
- May the wind be always at your back,
- May the sun shine warm upon your face,
- And the rains fall soft upon your fields,
- And, until we meet again
- May God hold you in the palm of His hand.
- Godspeed. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Music websites
I think the following articles need to be created if Jesus Freak Hideout has an article on Wikipedia.
- Christian Music Zine
- Indie Vision Music
- Louder Than the Music
- New Release Tuesday
- The Phantom Tollbooth
- Worship Leader
What do you think about that?HotHat (talk) 03:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Agree with NRT, Phantom Tollbooth & Worship Leader. Not sure about the other three. Not familiar with them. Not sure which notability policy they would fall under but suspect that if other RSes are writing about them that they should be enough. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Look at what I just did Worship Leader. I am being BOLD! I hope this does not backfire in my face like some other things that I got started on here.HotHat (talk) 06:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Need You Now (Plumb album), Walter Görlitz!
Wikipedia editor Hasteur just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Looks good, only concern I have right now is the lack of independent RS content. I am concerned that this may not pass the WP:NALBUM mark and suggest that as soon as the ablum is released and there's reasonable reviews, that they be plugged in.
To reply, leave a comment on Hasteur's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Need You Now (Plumb album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Forthcoming albums are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. The ONLY source that mentions this album is one tweet. We do not have reliable sources attaching the singles to this album, giving a release date, the track listing or anything else.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Need You Now (Plumb album) for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Need You Now (Plumb album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Need You Now (Plumb album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 05:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
New article
I have created a new article entitled This Time Around, and I am wanting to know what you think of the new page.HotHat (talk) 05:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- Just one change. Looks fine. Care to dig-in on the article that's been nominated for deletion twice (see above)? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- I found AllMusic and New Release Tuesday and put it on the deletion nomination.HotHat (talk) 06:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
I have created a new article entitled, The Alignment, so what do you make of it?HotHat (talk) 00:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Pretty good. Should have mentioned this before, but {{Cite music release notes}} will do what you're using the note field for. Add it once with a ref name and reference it after that. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Re
In Àngel Rangel, I do not put incorrect information. The subject has been discussed numerous times. Catalonia is not included as a country but as a region of Spain. And that was already included there, I just moved to change. And please, stop chasing me, because I'm not vandal and I do a decent job for a long time here. --Marcospace (talk) 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- As long as you make incorrect edits, I will revert them. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Test Management
Hi Walter
It would make me feel better if we could discuss my link here rather than me/you reverting things. Please could you let me know what you think I should do to this page I'm linking to. Perhaps there is something I can do to make the page more suitable for inclusion on the test management page as a link?
I genuinely feel that these videos (that cover products from multiple vendors) are good for the QA and test management community as a whole. I've spent a lot of time creating them to help people. I've seen these issues raised countless times as a consultant and really feel they help people get the best out of ANY test management solution they implement.
Ps just for info these are all the blog posts I've written over the past few months. The page I'm linking to on my site was an attempt to collate all of this information in to one useful resource page that helps people with the QAComplete (SmartBear vendor) and Quality Center (HP vendor) products that I mainly deal with....
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2013/01/managing-retests-with-quality-center/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2013/01/test-result-aggregation-with-quality-center/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2013/01/managing-a-library-of-test-cases-with-quality-center/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/12/using-test-parameters-with-quality-center/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/12/tracking-configurations-and-releases-with-quality-center/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/11/versioning-with-quality-center/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/10/assignment-of-test-cases-with-quality-center/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/07/tracking-configurations-and-releases-with-test-management-tools/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/07/identifying-retests-with-test-management-tools/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/07/aggregating-results-with-test-management-tools/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/06/test-management-libraries/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/05/using-test-case-parameters-in-test-management-tools/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/05/version-control-of-test-cases-in-test-management-tools/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/05/assignment-of-test-cases-in-test-management-tools/
- http://www.testmanagement.com/blog/2012/04/understanding-the-complexities-of-test-management/
I've put a lot of work in to this over the past few months. I'm sure it's helpful to a lot of people out there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wechlin (talk • contribs) 17:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Would love to hear your thoughts. Thank you :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wechlin (talk • contribs) 17:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm glad you've put a lot of work into this over the past few months. It will be helpful to a lot of people, but the rules, as I understand them, are simple: if you host them on a site that is selling something, they're not acceptable. You have to compare them to sites like http://kaner.com, http://www.satisfice.com/blog/ and http://www.developsense.com/. Perhaps you cold see if StickyMinds or some other source will pick-up the blog posts and mirror them on their site. It would be a lot easier to include them as sources or see also links if that was the case.
- Of course, I'm just one editor. You could take them to the Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard where a wider range of editors, many of whom know the WP:EL rules better than I do, can comment. We work by WP:CONSENSUS and so if they say that the blogs are great, then you can point to that decision and tell me that I'm wrong. Oddly enough, as a software tester, I know that people can be wrong. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Lets see
I can't wait to see if SummerPhD tries to get Run nominated for deletion!HotHat (talk) 07:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Release date is much sooner, and an AllMusic review, so it's less likely. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am giving you this source here in order to help you to keep Need You Now from getting deleted.
- Furthermore, this may help your case even more so.HotHat (talk) 08:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- The JFH link was already in the article and removed. When it turns into a review, it will be more useful. The ad is just an ad. It's not likely to be deleted. Two keeps so far. We'll see what consensus has to say. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Furthermore, this may help your case even more so.HotHat (talk) 08:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am giving you this source here in order to help you to keep Need You Now from getting deleted.
Move question
I noticed you removed the Chalk Outline (song) articles around, which is fine. I finally dug up the only guidance on the question of naming at WP:SONGS, which while not official, I guess is fine. It's consistent at least.
My question is how did you technically do that? I looked at the logs and I didn't see any deletion of Chalk Outline (song) before you moved it. Is this some technical feature I was unaware of? Shadowjams (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps I have more Wikipowers. In the past, I have not been able to, but this time I was. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Odd. Now I'm thoroughly confused. Shadowjams (talk) 23:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Rick L.Evans
Hi, I am the one who posted the page for Rick L. Evans.
Here is a start for third party verification of his life before The Imperials. I have many other sources that I am tryingto access and deliver to upgrad this article to full compiance.
Rick L, Evans, as spokesmen for The Imperials, has listed information, in this radio interview, that is notable and is “third Party” verification about his notoriety before The Imperials. Quote -- “These days, the group is comprised of a rock solid line-up of founding member Armond Morales (bass), 29-year veteran Dave Will (baritone/lead), popular alumni Paul Smith (tenor/lead) and new member Rick Evans (tenor/lead), who has traveled extensively with Billy Graham, Harvest Crusades, Promise Keepers and more”. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHEYqEXNeTk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POdtJkjWaX4
This is just one of many outlets that list his accomplishments before The Imperials. I am working to find the verifiable information and would like your input on what I need to bring to the table to keep this article from being deleted. I admit to being a bit new to this but want to comply with criteria to validate this person of notoriety, and accomplishment, in the Christian Community.