User talk:Carliertwo

Little context in The Edge of Love (soundtrack)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Edge of Love (soundtrack), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Edge of Love (soundtrack) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Edge of Love (soundtrack), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Carliertwo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 298 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

John McKay (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Valentine Carruthers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Siouxsie and the Banshees

Glad someone agrees with my proposal. Let's leave it a week to see whether anyone else comments, then if nobody raises any objections, I'll do all the necessary changes, redirects and so on. Regards, ~dom Kaos~ (talk)

Curious as to why you deleted an edition to this page regarding a cover by the song which has been used in a recent upcoming game trailer, (and the reason for many to start searching out this song in general). The old revision was merely a mention and a link. Or was the link source not good enough? ~Neos Dionsysos~ (talk)

Sex Pistols

Part of the problem is that your edit summary offered the claim that the "Paris gig was not interrupted due to Siouxsie." But that particular claim is made neither by the article--which says her swastika armband "caused a stir"--nor by Gimarc--who more specifically states that "she was punched by an outraged Arab man". Neither our article nor Gimarc specifies whether the incident took place at the gig, or before or after it, and in any case there is absolutely no claim that the gig was "interrupted" (there were frequently physical altercations at Sex Pistols gigs--they did not always necessitate interruptions). Does Blum--who does seem to be a strong source--actually say that the specific story of Siouxsie being punched is false? DocKino (talk) 19:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The source I referenced--Gimarc--along with others mentions the incident and, on multiple occasions, Siouxsie's armband, so no, it did not strike me as trivial. However, if, as you say, Blum indicates that the incident took place when the Sex Pistols were not even present, it may not be appropriate to include. I'll take it to the article's Talk page for discussion.

Why don't you raise your concern about coverage of Rotten's penchant for wearing clothing with swastikas on the article's Talk page, as well, so others have the opportunity to weigh in. Questions to consider: Where in the article do you think discussion of the matter should be added? Do you happen to have read any high-quality sources that deal with the matter?

November 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Siouxsie and the Banshees. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

In addition to inserting a personal attack in your edit summary, you have failed (once again) to adequately cite your reference sources. If the material is actually "online on thetimes.co.uk" as you claim, provide a direct link. Don't make readers wade through an entire web site in the hopes that they may stumble upon the exact resource you supposedly had right on your screen.

I hope that you will fix the insufficient link (which you not only added once, but reverted back into the article) so that this particular instance is resolved. I also hope you will begin taking seriously the requirements of WP:Verifiability, providing full citations (URLs for online resources, page numbers for paper publications, etc.) in general. And I hope you will keep the insults to yourself in future. Thanks. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 16:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Photograph of Siouxsie and the Banshees (1988).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Photograph of Siouxsie and the Banshees (1988).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siouxsie and the Banshees, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John McKay and Kenny Morris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

jan 2013

Please don't remove reliably sourced content without a consensus, like on siouxsie articles. And don't remove genres unexplained with no consensus. It's called vandalism

2601:A:4100:5A:B5DD:DB53:A2DC:13D4 (talk) 03:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

This is your final warning per the amount of vandalizing edits you made. The genres are all reliably sourced and define the genres of those albums. If you disagree, please make a Wikipedia:Consensus on the talk page. Also, that thing you said denying the album as goth wasn't reliable and it doesn't really prove it. It appears unreliable. Removing sourced material and sources is vandalism. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Siouxsie and the Banshees album articles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - 2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18 (talk) 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Please don't remove warnings and start ignoring them. Thank you.

2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18 (talk) 04:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC) [reply]