User talk:Noq

Shree ASC

I saw your notice on User talk:Shree ASC and wanted to let you know: We have precedent for personal usernames that disclose an association with a company. See User talk:Mark at Alcoa for example, where some admins and a bureaucrat agreed that this was acceptable, and not a violation of Wikipedia:Username policy because the account clearly belongs to one person, not to an organization or role.

Shree ASC (talk · contribs) appears to be a similar case, although he doesn't behave as a COI editor should (by contrast, Mark at Alcoa is open about his COI and he strictly complies with our guidelines). Anyway, he's apparently a mechanical engineer at ASC Process Systems in the UK, according to http://www.aschome.com/index.php/en/about (click on the "Our People" tab and you'll find Shree under the Mechanical Engineering section). ~Amatulić (talk) 00:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Bowling for Soup

I noticed you were one of the recent contributers to the Bowling for Soup wiki page. I would like to invite you to a discussion I have started on the talk page. I'm interested in adding some content, but am still reletively new to editing the wiki, and would like some help. Would you care to lend a hand? -Poodle of Doom (talk) 03:31, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Brooke Weston

I haven't really appreciated the tone that you spoke to me in. There are many videos on YouTube showing the pranks that take place at the end of the academic year. The school issues letters to students warning of bad behaviour at the end of the year additionally. There is a lot of information on the Brooke Weston page that is the result of 'original research'. What can you suggest for this information to be included? What is a reliable source?

Youtube links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yzPlHorGKU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr8aTbCIioI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNh7Ya0aCYk

Youtube is not generally regarded as a WP:reliable source. Click the blue link for what that consists of. And just because other stuff that should not be in the article currently exists there it is no reason to add to that. noq (talk) 17:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Still don't see why it can't be included. I'm not claiming something petty - the school renowned locally as being incredibly strict, yet also locally recognised that the last day of school provides an opportunity for the pupils to play some comeback. You're not exactly going to find a news report on it, but it's still a significant part of the school. Also, would that mean I'm free to go and delete anything without reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brefardan (talk • contribs) 00:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

See WP:verifiability. If it can't be verified - and the stuff you are trying to add you admit yourself cannot - then it does not belong. If it looks like it can be verified, then either add a {{cn}} tag or add a reference. noq (talk) 08:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Trip Tern

Hi, I saw that you reverted Trip Tern's link from Tel Aviv's page citing " not reliable source". Trip Tern is a travel startup, It has released the site in dec and have been covered by major tech blogs http://mashable.com/2013/01/10/triptern/ It aggregates data from sources such as wikitravel, dbbase etc for each Place and city and help users plan their travel using the automated algorithms.

Which sounds like an unreliable source to me - aggregating data from unreliable sources such as wikitravel makes it hard to consider it reliable. noq (talk) 18:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Not a Berman Sock

I just updated a couple of links to Berman's site. He removed a couple of pages where he tells the story about the murder he committed and got away with an insanity plea. He re-posted the pages where he brags about his exploits, but that was enough to make the links invalid. I used a name similar to one of his socks just to annoy him. Check the links you replaced, they lead to missing pages. Can you revert your change? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by RodrigoalvesnetII (talk • contribs) 02:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC) already

I had already seen that the original links do not work. The pages you replaced them with do not seem to back up the assertion in the talk page and you should not refactor other peoples comments on the talk page to misrepresent what was originally said. And your expressed desire to annoy Berman indicates that you should not be editing the article at all. noq (talk) 09:29, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Fortuna speedy deletion reason

Why is it being deleted , please read it . OliwierB (talk) 12:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

I have included importance in the [[Lfe (company) , and in Tarczyn (company) by stating with references : In 2012 , Tarczyn was awarded in the category "Juices, Nectars, Drinks" in the "Pearl of the FMCG Market in 2012", organized by Commercial News. .[3] Please tell me what else do I need to add to make it suitable . OliwierB (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fortuna (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion tagging of Armand Assante lead photo

In response to your rationales for tagging the lead image, I responded on the image talk page, indicating that both reasons you gave seem incorrect. Please either give reasons or remove the tag and restore the gay sex image to his bio. Thanks. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 16:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)