Talk:Jumpin' Jack Flash

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

The Rolling Stones B‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Rolling Stones, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Rolling Stones on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The Rolling StonesWikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling StonesTemplate:WikiProject The Rolling StonesThe Rolling Stones articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Songs C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Spring Heeled Jack connection?

the Victorian Monster was only known as Spring-Heeled Jack, not Jumping Jack Flash. I won't remove it, because I'm certainly no expert on the subject, but I believe it is not true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.231.80.168 (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

the band has never mentioned it as an inspiration. Stan weller 20:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The similarities between JJF and Spring Heeled Jack are worth mentioning: jumping and the spring action of the Victorian creature could be seen as synonomous; "it's a gas, gas, gas" could be related to the spitting of blue flame by the creature; also the devil theme the Stones were using at the time could seen as related to the devilish appearance of Spring Heeled Jack. It is surprising no source that talks about these similarities can be found.Rockford1963 19:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don Maclean

Don McLean notably features this song on the day the music died, essentially equating the stones with satan and with destroying rock and roll. Critical responses to this song should definitely include this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.165.87.237 (talk) 04:12, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jackflash1.jpg

Image:Jackflash1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Culture/Legacy/Trivia Section

You should not just remove the "Pop Culture" or trivia sections from the song pages. Instead you must try to accomodate them into the articles. For more information on how to deal with Trivia sections, check Wikipedia:Trivia sections--66.253.145.149 (talk) 13:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also please check Wikipedia:"In popular culture" articles before trimming anymore articles. --66.253.145.149 (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brian's involvement

how can he play the eguitar when his own article says: "From the 1967 album Between the Buttons until his death in 1969, Jones recorded just one guitar part: the slide guitar on "No Expectations" in 1968" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.196.255.86 (talk) 21:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

different sources state different things about the personnel and about Brian's contributions to the band's recordings. in the case of some tracks there isn't much eyewitness detail available, and/or the eyewitnesses contradict one another, so people are simply speculating. and please bear in mind that the Wikipedia article about Brian is not a reliable source. Sssoul (talk) 05:36, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On page 239 of his autobiography, Keith Richards states that all of the guitars on Jumpin' Jack Flash are acoustic.Cbben (talk) 05:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NBC "Weekend"

Thinking back 30 years here, I'm pretty sure this song was used for the opening theme for the NBC television show Weekend. Probably worth a mention here. Typofixer76 (talk) 21:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

to the IP adding original research ...

please read Wikipedia's policy about original research. the songwriters' statements about the lyrics are already cited (with proper sources, in the "inspiration" section of the article. adding your personal interpretation of the meaning of the lyric is not appropriate; nor is edit warring to impose your additions against consensus. thanks for getting more familiar with Wikipedia's policies. Sssoul (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

from User:68.116.53.246

Please read: Wikipedia:What is an article?
A Wikipedia article is a page that has encyclopedic information on it.

There is little information in the article about the song "Jumpin' Jack Flash" itself, and Fair Use allows use in an encyclopedia to further human knowledge. There is no original research here, the point of view is neutral, and the analysis of the chorus is neutral.

Perhaps consider adding to the analysis of the chorus, with referenced data, rather than performing absolute reverts of data based upon nitpicking one bit of data as a justification for deletion of all the data.

The song's chorus is as follows:

"Jumpin' Jack flash, it's a gas
Jumpin' Jack flash, it's a gas
Jumpin' Jack flash, it's a gas
Jumpin' Jack flash, it's a gas"

The song's chorus uses rhyme and rhymes the sound of the letter "a" in the word "flash" with the same phonetic sound in the word "gas" that follows, in repetition.

thanks for using the talk page (i've removed the duplicate of your message, and slightly refactored it so that it's clear who wrote what (but please see Wikipedia:Sign#How to sign your posts regarding how this is normally done).

i see no (0) value in adding four repetitions of a single line of the song's "outro", misidentifying it as "the song's chorus" and providing an unsourced (and uninformative) "analysis" of it. there's already a link to the lyrics on the band's official website; unsourced "analyses" are against Wikipedia's "no original research" policy, which you need to get acquainted with; and edit warring is not an acceptable way to work on articles. again, thanks for getting more familiar with Wikipedia's policies. Sssoul (talk) 06:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree as above, the lyrics could be considered a copyvio, and the analysis if completely original research, and trivial at best. Dayewalker (talk) 07:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"There is no original research here, the point of view is neutral, and the analysis of the chorus is neutral."68.116.53.246

Neutrality and bias do not factor into what is (or isn't) original research. 128.104.truth (talk) 21:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicky Hopkins?

I hear no piano on this song. Organ yes, piano no.Cbben (talk) 05:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the beginning, a piano can be heard, though barely audible.Zapspace (talk) 13:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]