Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Chinese Markets
- Old Chinese Markets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contesting Speedy and opening an AfD. I think the article has merit but certainly needs work. Tyros1972 Talk 07:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete probably speedy. I can see no merit in the article. Aside from the unreferenced WP:POV section upfront about the supposed greed of the Chinese, the article consists of large chunks of text copied without attribution from other Wikipeda articles: Secret_passage#Appearance_and_construction, Egyptian_Museum#King_Tutankhamun, in breach of the licensing terms. And neither has anything to do with the purported subject of the article anyway; it just seems to be there as ballast. AllyD (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as nonsense/copied text/attack page. Ansh666 17:42, 9 June 2013
- good call speedy deletePanpog1 (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
(UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)