Jump to content

User talk:KhabarNegar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dennis Brown (talk | contribs) at 10:59, 21 June 2013 (→‎Unblock: add). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello Every one, I'm so busy real life, BUT please do inform me about the tasks that should be done and I promise to do help any time I got, and also I can get help from my own language Wikipedia, And they will help. Thank You.

Interesting Categories

Wikipedia:Picture of the day

Smooth-billed ani
Photograph credit: Charles J. Sharp

Sharing files with commons

Hi,

How can I share the file with commons?

Cheers, Lamro (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, I have no Idea. I will ask and let you know. KhabarNegar (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No one knows exactly, I give up using them. Thanks. KhabarNegar (talk) 20:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Persian vs. Farsi

Hi there. I just corrected it in your user page. Please read this page as well. Regards, In fact 05:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir, How are you? Nice to see you here in EN.wiki. Sir I do appreciate your good Patriotism & thank you for this. But common! Persian and Persia is a traditional name, nowadays we talk Farsi and we live in Iran. You know, I mean if we want to be called Persia again so we have to do it from our side, if not it actually makes others confused. If that country name is Iran so where is Persia! If that language is Persian so what’s the different between Persian and Farsi? Anyway, thank you so much for spending time and make the world aware of our honorable history and culture. Best Regards,KhabarNegar (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I want to add the source you provided is respected by me, what I'm talking is about something which should happen, Do you agree? KhabarNegar (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. Well Persia and Iran is a different story. Here we are talking about the name of the language which is spoken in Iran. This article is also a good thing. Regards, In fact 11:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, I really admire you, because you always provide the source of your sayings, I always try to do the same too. Regards, KhabarNegar (talk) 05:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful

Many thanks for joining the translation efforts. We will get content out to you soon.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I receive a message in my Talk page in Fa.Wikipedia is that you? The page he asked me to review, is complete now. KhabarNegar (talk) 13:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you provide me a link? Also there is an article ready to be integrated here. [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Articles ready for integration

Here [2] Let me know if you need help. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 22:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you email me. I am working on improving co ordination of the translation project. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 23:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article waiting for upload

Some more articles have been translated and are ready for upload to the Persian wiki. I tried to upload it myself but my Persian wikicode skills are horrible. 4 are waiting here. Thanks for your help. Peter.C • talk • contribs 19:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Am needing your help here

[3] I have added a recently translated article to the talk page. Wondering if you can integrate it into the main article and drop me a note when you are done. Many thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 08:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering if you can give us a hand fixing this one to [4] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translated articles awaiting integration

Dear KhabarNegar,

I see your name listed on our project page as the Persian lead integrator - nice to meet you. :) I was wondering if you had some time to look into the integration of the completed Persian translations of Hepatitis C, Hypertension & Gastroenteritis. Please drop me an email here: ildikosantana at gmail dot com, so that I can send you the target files for integration, in case you don't have access to the TwB Workspace.
I would also appreciate it if you could let me know the status of the translated Anaphylaxis, Common cold, Croup and Dengue fever. Regrettably, I cannot (yet) read in your beautiful language to check if integration has been completed... ;)
Many thanks in advance for your assistance! Ildiko Santana (talk) 02:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An Apology

Hello KhabarNegar,

I just wanted to apologize for implying on that DNS/attack stuff the other day. I am doing preliminary sockpuppet research, and I needed to know who was watching me, (and it was successful in doing so). The Iran talk page just happened to be a convenient cover, so for that I am sorry - but you did help me out and I thank your for that, (so hopefully you will forgive me!).

When I am done with this, I look forward to helping you work on this article, inshāllā. I have been near Khorramshahr, (and got stuck in the swampy sand a few times). Someday I would like to visit the place my Tree of Life silk rug comes from ;) Patriot1010 (talk) 02:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ugg boots trademark disputes

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ugg boots trademark disputes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silk Road

My sincere apologies.

I got confused because I didn't notice that your edit duplicated all the place names.

Sorry if I confused you too... Begoon talk 14:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit is O.K. I checked it ;), Good Luck. KhabarNegar (talk) 21:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

Per the following WP:MEDRS we typically uses high quality sources such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneKhabarNegar (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:BP

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ms.wiki

Hi KhabarNegar, another user and me have replied to your message at ms.wiki. Cheers. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 08:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will check, :)KhabarNegar (talk) 21:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Middle Eastern American, KhabarNegar!

Wikipedia editor RDN1F just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good article. Remember to separate the different points in your article using sections. Makes it a lot easier to read

To reply, leave a comment on RDN1F's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 Done, :)KhabarNegar (talk) 21:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good work on your article Middle Eastern American, keep working on it to try and get the style right. RDN1F TALK 21:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Middle Eastern American, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Egyptian, Lebanese and Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done KhabarNegar (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right-libertarianism edit warring notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

See comments on why it is edit warring and why you don't understand point that this is a descriptive term, not the accepted one by pro-property libertarians. Discuss there, not here. Thanks. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 15:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This alert is WP:Harassment I am going to take you for an admin decision on this. so you may keep more calm next time, and learn how to not bite anyone. This is the history as anyone can see no Edit war happened(1-[5], 2-[6], 3-[7], 4-[8] That is all and nothing else, no other revert or something by anyone actually you deleted sourced parts of article). Plus Talk Page used before my edit[9]. Be ready to apologize. KhabarNegar (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Answer here: Talk:Right-libertarianism#User:Carolmooredc_HarassmentKhabarNegar (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
LearnKhabarNegar (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I also gave you an alert on your talk page, for deleting sourced parts of the article and placing your own view which have no source. Read the alert and always remember that to yourself.KhabarNegar (talk) 17:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
1- Its continued [10]
2- Response [11] KhabarNegar (talk) 08:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Rouhani

Hi - hope things are going well. I have had a think and I still would like to remove "Having a keen interest in learning modern sciences". I think bits of the page read a bit like it was written by a supporter and removing this might help. It doesn't seem to be sourced and seems a bit incongruous to me as he seems to have been studying law. Your point about him being different from his group in this respect would help justify something about this but I think we should have this added explicitly with some source if it is to be included. Do we know his motivation to go and study in the west was because interest in learning modern science? Much of Modern science was and is certainly taught in the University of Tehran at least as much as Glasgow Caledonian University. I think on the web there are or were some doubts about his doctorate - as some of his blurbs naughtily indicated Glasgow University. The ref to Glasgow Caledonian University's graduation list Doctor of Philosophy Hassan Feridon seems useful but I think we ought to be able to have a title of his PhD and dates. Anyway I won't revert your revert of my deletion until I have had more of think - or perhaps at all! Anyway best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 12:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Too much respect for the time you put kindly please edit that case, as just what you think its true, by this much logic you are giving of course you are true about this. But just something, as I'm following that page I am almost think that the most editors there, are actually not his supporters at all. But as I said in Edit summary as its not provided by a direct source so removing that is just OK. & you kindly may do that. I think we both doing the same thing but from two points of views, you think the article is wrote by a supporter & I think the reverse. You know for example if that part become removed, what the reader would think is that this guy is so Westernophile! You see that can be a mentality. At last I do surely consider you as an User with total good faith on this, & of course change by you in this regards is no problem. Last thing, if I'm not contributing in that kind of articles, it is because I'm not that much interested in serious political things, that's why I just follow that, Thanks for having this discussion together, Best Regards & have a good day. KhabarNegar (talk) 14:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure whether removing this would lead readers to think he was "Westernophile". I think it might be nice to find something that mentions his interest in modern science and include that if this is a distinctive feature of his views. I think the page may get more attention depending on current affairs and more eyes can help. Anyway thanks for this and I am now minded to remove it given you aren't too worried about it - but will wait a bit in any case. Best wishes. (Msrasnw (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]
good..., you know what... something that looks positive and in favor for a society actually can be negative thing for another part of an another society, For example we two may do think the same, but We should be sure that there are people out there, that do think in another way of course:), anyway thanks wish you good time. KhabarNegar (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I

Information icon Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TippyGoomba (talk) 20:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. See my conclusions here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 16:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • An indef block doesn't mean forever, but you need some mentoring, some remedial work on copyright, reliable sources and collaboration. At this point, your participation is disruptive and causing unnecessary stress for a number of people. Hopefully, this is something you can address then come back in a productive way, but I feel I have no choice but to block here. Any admin is free to modify this block as they see fit without my prior permission, although a note afterwards is requested. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 16:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KhabarNegar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the case for this decision which is made by User:Dennis Brown, [12]. Not a single link to the reason for this block... For a block two things are needed: One which is most important is link of dif which is the problem, two the any talks which had happened about that difs and shows I acted against a rule of Wikipedia and have repeated that too. Not a single links about these issues are provided , so the decision which made by User:Dennis Brown is wrong according Wikipedia methods & standards. KhabarNegar Talk 18:30, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A link and reason were clearly provided making your unblock rationale inapplicable. Mkdwtalk 19:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

KhabarNegar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In all time which I was in Wikipedia till now I always use & answer & talk in Talk pages of the articles, There is not a single time which a direct transparent request from me, which I did not answer. I always listen to any specific thing which is told in any Talk page of the articles. I here ask to provide me with one time which a direct specific clear ask in any Talk page from me with I don’t answer and act in a good appreciated way… Any edit here from me is from good faith, if anyone feels it’s disruptive (the reason this block happened) it’s may be because of his/her own prejudgments about me, so he/she sees anything I do not good. I am neutral, 100% but if anyone things I’m not, 1- I want to tell him/her he had been wrong, 2- I will not again do any contribution about such articles again, because I learn that as much as you act according facts and logic accepted by all again there are something people really don’t like, so don’t bother them, so you are right I am not going to put something which majority of en.wikipedia see as not acceptable & not good, OK. But really I just thought Wikipedia as a good place to talk about facts about realities which are important, but Okay, I don’t care from now on. I also want to ask Users to keep calm, and do not judge too soon… what they may see as not good if they think twice they may feel that is actually right… Never mind… I request to 1- If someone have the time read this[13] , OR 2- If you do not have time just unblock this account to see my further contribution to get to the point which I am not really a disruptive editor as mentioned in Block reason. I will not do any contribution in articles which have Users that don’t agree with me, even though I may think I am doing a positive thing. I think I should be unblocked because I never ever rejected any request for discussion in Talk pages of the articles… Please provide differential edits that shows I have not accepted a reliable specific advice in any Talk page. So I will be able to answer. Here[14] you see all that is said. Anything else? I think I do understand the things mattered to the admin. As I have had good faith, so I think I just should quit editing in the specific articles… And that is Understand… & learn. I in fact have good faith when I do edited here, but I can understand probably it were not received by others, I do believe probably it’s because hurry stereotyping prejudgments, But anyway I should just quit editing in certain articles, and I will do that, because I understand that as a normal ordinary user it is not actually that much important what I think specially when there a group of Users that feel they don’t like your edits, so why to bother… OK I will just quit editing in those pages… As I actually have done this already if you see & check that… I think you all may ask User:NPguy(The user which filled the AnI), to know more if I am a disruptive editor, or I always have Good faith about anything. KhabarNegar Talk 21:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

See below and #Unblock. Please note that Jmh649 unblocked. Mkdwtalk 04:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This block seems a little heavy handed. This user has made a number of positive contributions [15], [16], [17] and has never been blocked before. Looks like the issues primarily relate to middle east politics. A topic ban of 6 month to a year widely construed would likely have been sufficient. But than again maybe I am overly optimistic. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree the block was excessive. A topic ban would have accomplished the same palliative result at the articles under dispute and would have given KhabarNegar plenty of room to gain experience and recognition for his positive contributions here. Moreover, regardless of their concerns, the editors really piled on this relative newbie and there was plenty of borderline personal animosity in their complaints. Really gratuitous to this uninvolved observer. I think that the block should be modified as proposed to a six-month topic block which would allow the editor to branch out and contribute in less contentious areas. SPECIFICO talk 02:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that I am the primary advocate for action against KhabarNegar's disruption. The ban certainly solves my issues. However, if someone wants to take responsibility for his edits, I would be comfortable with no block nor topic ban and heavy mentoring. The pact would be something like, if he is objectively disruptive and ignores the mentor, we revisit the ban. Any volunteers? I'd love to (and tried to) but I'm sure he hates me by now. TippyGoomba (talk) 03:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The block was strong, I know because I did it, with the understanding that someone would work with him to understand what he is doing wrong. There is no fixed period of time that would solve the problem. When someone is clueless as to the issue, giving them a 24 hour or 1 week block is useless and is only ticking off "incremental block" boxes until he gets an indef that no one will unblock, ever. Their best chance at coming back in a productive way is to indef and engage here. I clearly gave any admin permission to unblock without even asking my opinion first above. I just didn't know if a week or a month was going to be long enough to fix the problem. I have no problem with others want to work with him, figure out a topic ban or other solution, and have any admin unblock based on those determinations. As a matter of fact, I encourage it strongly. His behavior at the ANI and clear indication he wouldn't discuss there but just give the one long tirade of diffs (many of which didn't prove his points) pretty much demanded this. Again, it was never intended to be forever[18] only for as long as was needed. If people can get him to engage here and find a solution, nothing would make me happier. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 19:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • If a user is entirely blocked, there's not going to be any constructive mentoring, just abstract discussion, to which neither party is likely to devote much time or attention. A much better way to engage mentors and to allow the user to hone his skills would be a topic block so that he can re-engage in other articles which do not trigger the problematic behavior and frankly in which he will not be likely to encounter a cabal of impatient and hostile editors. I didn't see any good faith effort to mentor him in the history of his difficulties, just accusations, namecalling, policy citations and challenges. Please consider changing this to a topic-related block. SPECIFICO talk 21:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't want you to think I was ignoring you, but I did spend a great deal of time pouring over probably 100 diffs and trying to determine the least aggressive way to deal with the problem. Looking at the issue at a glance, it is easy to dismiss, which is probably why so few participated at the ANI. (That, and it was an insanely long and convoluted set of diffs that were provided there). As I said, any admin can take any action they choose without any hard feelings from me, and without my permission. My recommendation is that Khabar discuss here, discover what the problems are, simply indicate a willingness to work on them, and help us provide a path forward. The type of disruption here is very broad, it isn't a singular thing. I didn't have the authority at ANI to impose a topic ban, although an unblocking admin can do that as a pre-condition of an unblock if Khabar agrees to it. Admin can't just unilaterally impose a "ban" on someone, that is against policy. I will be happy to help, but Doc James has already indicated he will consider the unblock. Now it is up to Khabar to start the dialog in a calm manner, address the concerns and agree to whatever terms Doc James puts on him, if any. I won't interfere with that process, although I am willing to help it. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 01:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doc James has shown an interest, I will happily leave to him. I do think that the disruption needs to be addressed by the editor themselves and they need to at least understand and be able to articulate the concerns, but I will leave that to him. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 22:00, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have put the offer out to Khabar. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is the ideal solution. James, thank you for offering. Dennis, thank you for working on this, it's a tough situation with nothing but tough decisions to make. TippyGoomba (talk) 01:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wouldn't at all support unblocking him. His indefinite block is justified by his works. His English is "broken" as evident in his unblock requests and copyright infringements. His English is understandable, but I am sure that people will agree with me in that his language should not be considered legitimate. He is basically making a mess of the English-Wikipedia, a mess that is left for other editors to clean up. It's in everyone's best interest to have this block in place forever. English-Wikipedia has its own standards and requirements. I understand that his mother tongue is not English, but that is the case for most editors here-my first language is also not English and I can read and write in five languages.--IsaacsirupChatMe!ReadMe!! 01:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think a fair compromise would be:

  1. He will not edit any articles related to politics (that includes all articles about countries and religious groups)
  2. He is free to revert obvious vandalism (we really need more people doing this and I see many example of him doing this well)
  3. If he wishes to edit medical content in English I will be happy to help with guidance. Requirements include paraphrasing (copy and pasting not allowed), and high quality sources must be used per WP:MEDRS

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to these requirements.KhabarNegar Talk 03:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KhabarNegar, the article Sanctions against Iran would benefit from your input. If you have suggestions or sources, please take them to my talk page. I would love to rebuild our relationship. TippyGoomba (talk) 03:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tippy, Khabar is unable to contribute to this article due to the topic ban he is under. Maybe in 6 month or a year he can apply to have this lifted. I consider the topic ban to also apply to the talk pages. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd considered that and thus suggested that he leave suggestions on *my* talk page, rather than the article page. I'm more interested in his sources, he's been good at finding them, less so at introducing them. Conveniently, I love reading them, but hate looking for them. It's a good relationship. I leave the final word on the matter at your discretion, of course. TippyGoomba (talk) 03:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that would be fine. If you are happy with him leaving comments on your talk page I would not have an issue with it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(I was going to send it after first sentence by TippyGoomba but it looks like 3 more edits are before me, I'm not read them yet)
No, Thanks…
If I tried to edit that article in first place the reason was because, I really had tried to give some information I thought maybe you guys don’t know, I’m not that much interested any politic the reason I start to make Sanctions against Iran more neutral because actually something happened as a result of this sanctions and I saw there is no mention of these effects of sanctions in the article (just right now as they are removed by you :)) I really don’t care that much about Wikipedia articles being neutral and complete…, AND TippyGoomba, I know you don't believe me but I do not hate you,(as you have said above). This is the problem, you guys are making all these USA vs. Iran or you hate me so I hate you back & these kinds of logic. No one hates anyone, logic, facts; mathematics & reality do not need hate at all. Try to see the world and understand it by Logic & Mathematics (Facts), so I’m not interested in wasting my time anymore. KhabarNegar Talk 04:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you review the record, I hope you will find that none of my assertions were any sort of USA vs Iran thing. I object mostly on technical reasons. Sources convince me, not reasoned arguments. TippyGoomba (talk) 04:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Probably best for Khabar to spend time working on other topic areas.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc James: Sure.
@TippyGoomba: TippyGoomba, the only thing that I wanted to tell above is, I think there is a little mistake in your judgment about me, I do not hate anyone, anything, any... . No one hates you, please think this way, maybe you find interesting things. Anyway, Never mind..., & I don't think if I have any more interest in that subject anymore, Regards,KhabarNegar Talk 10:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I have unblocked this user per the discussion above and with the restrictions mentioned. I will keep this talk page watched and if further issues occur please leave me a note on my talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KhabarNegar&oldid=560880590"