User talk:75.70.142.23

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, c-75-70-142-23.hsd1.co.comcast.net (75.70.142.23), is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Comcast Cable. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register).

Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Criticism of Monarchy

Thanks for your contribution to the above article. Unfortunately I've had to remove it as it was unreferenced and read more as a personal rant against the idea of monarchy rather than a considered summary of critical comments made in reliable third party publications. Please see our policy on original research for more information on this. Thank you, and happy editing. WaggersTALK 08:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Paris syndrome. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Auric talk 12:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm I am One of Many. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Racial hygiene seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 08:13, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Racial policy of Nazi Germany, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sonderweg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 15:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Henry L. Stimson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. If you think Doug Long is an acceptable source, you must justify it on the article talk page. If other editors agree, then it can be added. But no NOT add it again. Your IP address will be blocked if you add any more disruptive material to any article page. – S. Rich (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Note, I did post a request that you be blocked for vandalism. And I removed that request because you did open talk page discussions. Be advised that I shall re-report you if you seek to restore the removed material. You must achieve WP:CONSENSUS in order to keep it. Thanks for participating on the talk pages. – S. Rich (talk) 17:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Be advised, I have reported you for erasing portions of 64.134.24.94's comments. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That was me. I removed my comment. Just chill out. 75.70.142.23 (talk) 04:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS for additional information.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 15:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Japanese archipelago. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 07:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Japanese archipelago, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 07:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Tbhotch. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 07:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Honshu. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 08:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Stop abusing the unsourced templates. State your reason. Specify the line and we can go from there. You are vandalizing the articles with random unsourced templates. This is disruptive. 75.70.142.23 (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance templates are used to let other editors know that improvements need to be made. Using these templates is not vandalism. Please do not assume that the templates distract from the article's appearance and therefore must demonstrate ill intent. It's quite the opposite. Chris Troutman (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese archipelago

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Japanese archipelago. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 08:08, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do you have evidence I "hate" Japan, or is simple defamation? Also I'm not an admin, so please revoke my "admin rights". Per this I should have taken you to admins since the begining as you are not here to contribute constructively. As apparently you need to be guided where an article with unsourced statements elsewhere I tagged every single unsourced statement the article has, with which you can now see the obvious. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 08:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you don't hate Japan you wouldn't question all the sentences in simple articles. This is not political article. This is common sense. Stop impulsively adding unsourced templates. That is my point. 75.70.142.23 (talk) 08:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.