Jump to content

User talk:RobertEves92

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2.102.187.12 (talk) at 16:53, 11 September 2013 (→‎Replied on my talk: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revert

Regarding this edit: I wouldn't consider this vandalism (it's a legitimate link), but I'm also reluctant to un-revert it because I'm not sure how notable it is. I'm not that familiar with Wikipedia policies, so if you could take a look at it that would be great. Thanks! --Lethosor (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I jumped the gun, your edit was in fact fine. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 17:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't actually my edit, but thanks anyway. :) --Lethosor (talk) 17:54, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the tags are rather puzzling - how is the article outdated? StAnselm (talk) 21:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately some of wikipedia's tags are poorly named, that one is listed as "page requires updating" which is misleading. What I mean was the page requires updating with more information, not that the information is out of date as the tag would indicate.KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 21:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, OK. Of course, this is what the whole stub system is supposed to be about. That's what I created - a stub. If you like, you could use Template:Missing information or Template:Incomplete. StAnselm (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Updated: Page now has stub tag replacing the tags I placed earlier

I declined your request for speedy deletion, primarily because the redirect was not "recently created" but has been around for several months now. I also think that an argument might be made that, even though factually inaccurate the redirect is still potentially useful, as the town is on the border of Essex according to Bishop's Stortford. At any rate, I think it's better to discuss it at WP:RFD. Cheers, postdlf (talk) 20:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ancientwishes (talkcontribs) 22:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waytemore Castle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norse and Convex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zyngfing etc page protection requests

Hi there. Just to let you know, both the pages you asked to be protected already are, and were already yesterday when you asked. It's a feature of the software that you might not be able to see that protection, but you certainly won't be able to create the article, only an admin can. Thanks. GedUK  11:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah smashing, thanks for the clarification. Is there any way at all to tell for future reference? KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 11:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Try and edit the page. If you can't, it's protected. If you can, it's not (or only semi-salted). GedUK  11:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk

I replied before I realised your note said to reply here. 2.102.187.12 (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]