User talk:GabrielF

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2010/December; 2011/January; 2011/February; 2011/March; 2011/April; 2011/May; 2011/June; 2011/July; 2011/August; 2011/September; 2011/October; 2011/November; 2011/December; 2012/January; 2012/February; 2012/March; 2012/April; 2012/May; 2012/June; 2012/July; 2012/August; 2012/September; 2012/October; 2012/November; 2012/December; 2013/January; 2013/February; 2013/March; 2013/April; 2013/May; 2013/June; 2013/July; 2013/August; 2013/September; 2013/October; 2013/November; 2013/December; 2014/January; 2014/February; 2014/March; 2014/April; 2014/May; 2014/June; 2014/July; 2014/August; 2014/October; 2014/November; 2014/December; 2015/January; 2015/February; 2015/March; 2015/July; 2015/September; 2015/November; 2016/January; 2016/February; 2016/April; 2016/June; 2016/July; 2016/November; 2016/December; 2017/February; 2017/May; 2017/June; 2017/November; 2017/December; 2018/March; 2018/April; 2018/May; 2018/June; 2018/August; 2018/November; 2018/December; 2019/January; 2019/March; 2019/April; 2019/June; 2019/August; 2019/October; 2019/November; 2019/December; 2020/August; 2020/November; 2021/February; 2021/June; 2021/November; 2022/May; 2022/November; 2023/March; 2023/June; 2023/July; 2023/November; 2023/December; 2024/March;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Please create a new section at the bottom so that your comments can be picked up by the archive bot.

Involved Editor

GabrielF, your comment would be appreciated at the WP:AE that Sepsis has filed against me, given your involvement and discussion with Sepsis. Much appreciated. Plot Spoiler (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to mel sembler page

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at mel sembler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Once again, you have deleted well sourced content spuriously claiming the source to be unreliable. I know I should always assume good faith, but given how you behaved last time... in any case i restored the text in question.