Jump to content

User talk:ItsZippy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Antopandeth (talk | contribs) at 00:35, 15 September 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

Version

You reverted to a version with a broken link in the image caption. Pass a Method talk 17:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about that. Could you identify the link that needs fixing for me, as I can't seem to find it myself (or put an edit request on the talk page). Thanks. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:52, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you protect Abraham, Moses and Daniel too please? Pass a Method talk 21:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Those three articles do not seem to be experiencing edit warring as bad as Abrahamic religions was before I protected it, so I think it's probably best to keep the unprotected for now. If edit wars continue on those pages then protection may become necessary; for now, I think it's best not to protect. I will watchlist the four articles and keep my eye on them over the next few days. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 22:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User:Wiki hamze has notified Islam, Christianity and Judaism's talk pages but failed to notify the Baha'i talk page of the ongoing discussion at Talk:Abrahamic religions. Is that a violation of WP:CANVAS? Pass a Method talk 13:40, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly, though if it is, it's only a minor case I think. The message was neutral ('come and join in' rather than 'come and defend your religion', etc) and it didn't look like an attempt to rally support. Nevertheless, missing out Talk:Bahá'í Faith may skew consensus that happens. I'd be inclined to assume that the messages were sent in good faith; perhaps post a message on Talk:Bahá'í Faith, in line with the others - I don't think any further action is needed. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict at WP:ANI

Your recent edit deleted Enkyo's edit of a minute earlier in which s/he responded to several admins and other editors. Can you find a way to restore that? NebY (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, sorry about that. Another editor has fixed it now. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 15:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh good, I shouldn't have worried. NebY (talk) 15:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deepa Miriam

Antopandeth (talk) 01:35, 13 September 2013 (UTC) My article is continuously reverted.[reply]

This article was originally created by me. The fact that Deepa is married to me and she is still my wife. It was mentioned in the first time itself and it was never changed by any one. Recently one person (FreeRangeFrog) started to change the fact. Even after I gave several links to make him understand that the fact is she is married, it is reverted continuously. This action is with some bad personal interest I feel. Please advise him or block him from doing wrong editing. Otherwise please remove the article. please check the links for citation. AntoPandethDeepa Miriam In Asianet TV. Anto Pandeth and Deepa

Thanks

Anto Pandeth. Antopandeth (talk) 01:35, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anto Pandeth. I understand your position; however, we need reliable sources if we are to put information about Deepa Miriam's marital status in the article. With living people, we do need to be incredibly careful as to what we write about them because what we write on Wikipedia can have a real-life effect on people. Thus, even if what you say is true, we will err on the side of caution and only include Miriam's marital status if we have really strong sources. I couldn't see how the first link you gave me related to Deepa Miriam's marital status, and the second was dead. The third may be of some use, though I don't speak the language. If you can find other sources, that would really help; until then, it is likely that people will keep removing the information you add. I know that this can be frustrating; however, you must understand that we need to be incredibly careful with biographies about living people. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 10:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

Not that you would know me.

Only to ask if you might be planning a wikipage on Origen's Theodicy following the new book by Mark Scott titled "Origen on the Problem of Evil," Oxford Univ. Press, 2012. LittleIPEditor (talk) 19:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Antopandeth (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help me please

Zippy,

I was not frustrated in any manner because the fact is fact,but I was disappointed. The block on me from adding content was removed and I have reverted Deepa’s marital status in the Article. The fact is that from the beginning, when I created the article, the marital status was there for three years. Now one person started to edit the article even after giving him enough links to prove marital status. If that person can’t understand the language, he can ask for a marriage certificate which is in English language. Even if you want it I can provide through a personal email. My mail Id is anto.pandeth@gmail.com,. Please feel free to send your email to me if you want to see the marriage certificate. I hope this will help me.

Thank you.

Antopandeth.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ItsZippy&oldid=572955487"