User talk:Lzdimitar

Talkback

Hello, Lzdimitar. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page.
Message added 22:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)~. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lzdimitar. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page.
Message added 22:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macedonia national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Given this edit, I will be kind this time and place this note rather than directly reporting you at WP:ANI. This is serious. You've been blocked in the past for adding unsourced content into articles, and you seemingly haven't learnt about it. This is your last warning.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

As I advised you in the message on your IP talk page, you as an editor are blocked and cannot edit under any IP or account until such a time that you are able to address concerns raised regarding your editing (or a period of one month, whichever occurs first). A copy of that block message is included below for your reference as it applies here as well:

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. You know that your edits are contentious, having had your main account blocked for it, as well as this IP, and yet you continue to plod away making the same unsourced changes and challenged edits (at times evading your block to do so). Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project - you need to be willing to discuss your edits when others bring concerns to the table. You are blocked from editing for one month; this means you cannot edit using any IP or your registered account. In order to be unblocked you will need to convince an administrator that you are willing to discuss your edits when concerns are raised and perhaps be willing to seek a mentor. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 15:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you were willing to communicate with other editors and use article and user talk pages to discuss issues and changes you would likely have a much rewarding experience as an editor. This is, at least, your sixth block. If you cannot take this time to find a way to learn how to edit collaboratively you will likely find yourself indefinitely blocked. Isn't it worth the time and effort to at least make an effort at communicating? --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 14:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for logging out and using your IP to edit disruptively by adding unsourced content to articles. I have therefore blocked the IP for three months as well as your main account for the same duration. All of the information and advice I provided in my previous block message above, as well as the follow-up note, still apply. Either there is some language barrier that prevents you from communicating with other editors and understanding the problems with your edits as presented by concerned editors, or you are actively ignoring them. Neither scenario forgives your completely disregard for policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 15:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lzdimitar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the flights can be booked on Royal Air Maroc website for this Im not add source. Before this edit I create new page with official source you can view and I thing is not correct with 10 symbols to be punished for 3 months... Lzdimitar (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=the flights can be booked on Royal Air Maroc website for this Im not add source. Before this edit I create new page with official source you can view and I thing is not correct with 10 symbols to be punished for 3 months... [[User:Lzdimitar|Lzdimitar]] ([[User talk:Lzdimitar#top|talk]]) 21:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=the flights can be booked on Royal Air Maroc website for this Im not add source. Before this edit I create new page with official source you can view and I thing is not correct with 10 symbols to be punished for 3 months... [[User:Lzdimitar|Lzdimitar]] ([[User talk:Lzdimitar#top|talk]]) 21:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=the flights can be booked on Royal Air Maroc website for this Im not add source. Before this edit I create new page with official source you can view and I thing is not correct with 10 symbols to be punished for 3 months... [[User:Lzdimitar|Lzdimitar]] ([[User talk:Lzdimitar#top|talk]]) 21:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You are editing via your IP as well, and it is those edits that are an issue. You as an editor are blocked for three months, regardless of whether you log in to edit. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 22:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]