This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tokidokix(talk | contribs) at 02:46, 27 September 2013(answers to Binksternet). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:46, 27 September 2013 by Tokidokix(talk | contribs)(answers to Binksternet)
Hello, Tokidokix! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim17:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Marie Curie shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Binksternet, I am sorry, but I think the talk page history show that I have been looking for discussion and consensus on this topic. However, my arguments keep on not being answered. And as far as I can see, the commits I am reverting were not done after a consensus-reaching discussion. Further you have stated yourself in the talk page that you were fine with the version I was reverting to. As for edit warring, I did not violate the three revert rule, and mentioned in the last commit that I was going to slow down on the revert war from now on, so as to avoid things getting too ugly. And as you should now, I have already taken steps to start a dispute resolution process.Tokidokix (talk) 02:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
