Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry
- UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe this WP:VANITY-press published book fails WP:BK rather plainly. Not notable outside of WP:FRINGE circles. jps (talk) 18:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. I don't see any reviews, and the article has none listed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This is borderline promotional in how it's written, but it looks like it would just narrowly squeak by a speedy via that outlet. In any case, I can't find anything to show that this book is ultimately notable enough for an entry. I would say redirect to the author, but there are many of them- making it impossible to decide which one is the more feasible redirect target. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. This article looks more like a table of contents than an encyclopedic entry. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not notable and written as an originally researched promo. LuckyLouie (talk) 16:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable per reasons outlined above. Finnegas (talk) 11:39, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - it's a cut'n'paste from some amateur X-Files. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The article about this book's author Richard Thieme may be in violation of the policies concerning biographies of living persons: WP:BLP, specifically notability. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - it is snowing outside and online. Bearian (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This book was reviewed in a collegiate library review journal, Feb 2013, Vol 50, No.06. The book received a positive recommendation and amongst the comments was, "A Useful Resource of the study of a controversial topic." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.59.173 (talk) 00:53, 12 December 2013 (UTC)