User talk:92.238.171.3

October 2013

Hello, I'm Sgr927. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Avram Iancu, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sgr927 10:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.169.237 (talk) 11:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kanjiža, you may be blocked from editing. 79.117.176.117 (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Final warning

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kanjiža, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.187.164 (talk) 09:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.187.164 (talk) 10:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ethnic-motivated edit warring by anonymous users. Thank you. No such user (talk) 08:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Native names

Please note that the native name field in the infobox has to be filled up when the English name is not the same with the official name, like in the following cases:

• Bucharest, where the native name is București
• Vienna, where the native name is Wien
• Copenhagen, where the native name is København

See template documentation Template:Infobox_settlement/doc#Complete_empty_syntax.2C_with_comments 79.117.171.176 (talk) 22:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Warning

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

January 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cluj-Napoca. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Avoid starting an edit war(WP:WAR) and breaking the 3RR or you may be blocked from editing. Also respect the WP:NPOV in the articles and while you are editing. Keep your personal opinion aside and focus on the facts only. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Adrian (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

---