Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday Omony (2nd nomination)

Sunday Omony

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don;t know if news stories can be told apart for pR for this profession, but for someone to be notable I'd expect major awards, which don;t seem to be present. DGG ( talk ) 06:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. She appears to be doing some notable things, but agree that if any of them had received independent praise or endorsement from a notable body, that would be a lot better. She may just be grandstanding, but let's give her the benefit of the doubt. --gilgongo (talk) 16:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. First time I've heard giving the benefit of the doubt as an argument for keep! WP:NMODEL requires significant roles in multiple media, a large fan base or some kind of contribution to the field. Hosting your own TV show and being an ambassador for a minor non-profit isn't enough unfortunately. Gm545 (talk) 12:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Gave it a crack, think it's good to go! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 23:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes our general notability guidelines. Article has been reorganized, de-adverted, expanded with more reliable secondary sources. She surely passes our guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 01:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Despite the WP:ILIKEIT argument, I think the additional sources confirm notability. Careful though, one of the links was malware which I had to delete. Keep your AV up to date!