Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mircea Popescu

Mircea Popescu

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is essentially no coverage indicating this individual might meet WP:BIO. The vast majority of the references are either blog posts, forum posts, contracts and the like, or they do not mention Popescu at all. There are a handful of passing mentions in what seem to be slightly more reliable sources, but nothing suggests the depth needed for an encyclopedic biography. - Biruitorul ^Talk 03:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is mention by name in Gawker, Wired, Bloomberg News, Wall Street Journal, Hacker News, and pretty much every other venue there. You will probably have to delete all Romanian bios at this rate, because currently there doesn't exist a Romanian alive with better exposure. Check the actual references. Altus mare (talk) 09:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]

And Forbes, Ars Technica. Reuters. Altus mare (talk) 09:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- 1) "Mention" isn't enough to demonstrate encyclopedic notability. Yes, Bloomberg News "mentions" Popescu: to note that he sent an e-mail denying having broken the law. This hardly satisfies the "significant coverage" portion of WP:BASIC.
  - For your convenience, here is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2014_March_24#Amir_Taaki compare and contrast.
- 2) Your other comment is nonsense. If by "exposure" you mean "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject", then it's perfectly possible to write comprehensive articles about living Romanian individuals like Victor Rebengiuc, Sever Voinescu or Radu Berceanu without stuffing them with garbage. (I mean, you actually think this belongs in an encyclopedia??) - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - You seem to be having some issues, perhaps of the crab mentality variety. Altus mare (talk) 14:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Definitely notable, https://twitter.com/FlitterOnFraud/status/447013452226113536 etc Jordanee155 (talk) 13:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]

- Sockpuppet. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Seeing how I'm the only vote so far, sockpuppet of who? Get over it, you didn't read the refs and jumped to conclusions. It happens, no need to push it further and embarass yourself. Jordanee155 (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Jordanee155 (talk) 13:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - With 39 inline citations, including information about him in The Wall Street Journal and other major newspapers, this man is quite notable.--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- DThomsen8, I'm frankly quite disappointed to see this sort of reasoning from such an experienced user as yourself. Of the "39 inline citations", at least 23 manifestly fail WP:RS, while the remainder are at best of tangential relevance. (If another 164 links to Popescu's blog were added, would you then commend the article for its "203 inline citations"?) For instance, the Wall Street Journal article, if you actually look at it, says nothing at all about Popescu. I hope to see you come back with a more thorough, policy-based explanation of why you think the man is notable. - Biruitorul ^Talk 16:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/21f3of/mircea_popescu_on_wikipedia/ I would imagine this sort of thing must be against some sort of policy you have here. Even if it isn't, please keep your nonsense contained, reddit has no use for wikipedia drama. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.125.251.83 (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above IP geolocates to Romania, home of Mircea Popescu. The post on Reddit is highly suspicious and doesn't look like something User:Biruitorul would post. It's also the only post ever made on Reddit by that account. Looks like an attempted frame job. -- GreenC 17:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by the views plug-in the page in question was seen by a lot of people (262 times in the last 90 days as of this moment). Much to nobody's surprise, it generated disproportionate edits from Romanian users. This would moreover indicate notability, and while the reddit post may or may not have been originated by the AfD proponent, it also shows clear familiarity with the original article's subject among the reddit userbase. None of this is particularly noteworthy, but User:Green Cardamom's recent history did catch my eye. So, GC: what is your connection to Dave Renton, and how come a delete vote by a new user sent you into such a tailspin? By now you've dedicated more words to hounding them than is warranted, wouldn't you say?192.65.243.5 (talk) 22:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea who user:Biruitorul is, but on the strength of a cursory review of his user talk page it'd seem that a) he has a lengthy history of emotion-driven activity and poor interactions with other users, chiefly new users; and b) is actually Romanian, and perhaps in some relation to the Romanian Foreign service.

That said, the discussion is neither here nor there, I have no relation to either the article's subject, or any of the users involved, or with wikipedia in general. Nor do I wish to, which is the point: keep your crap off reddit. Nobody likes you, generally speaking, and the presumptuous, misguided sort of nonsense I'm responding to here is a prime example of why. Romania is a large country, populated by a lot of distinct Internet users. Comparatively, wikipedia is a small shithole populated by a lot of indistinguishable idiots. Please stop getting into everyone's day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.125.251.83 (talk) 18:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Green Cardamom, thank you for your comment here and at the SPI page. As you suggest, I have nothing whatsoever to do with the Reddit post. - Biruitorul ^Talk 17:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have taken the trouble to go through all the references. It breaks down like so: "SatoshiDice shares are traded on the MPEx bitcoin stock exchange" (Forbes) ; " S.DICE share prices on MPEX are now more than double the original IPO price." (Bitcoin Magazine) ; "SatoshiDice was listed on MPEX, a Romanian Bitcoin securities exchange" (Venture beat, multiple other references by name) ; "traded on MPEx, the Romanian Bitcoin securities exchange" (Coindesk) ; "it was publicly traded on MPEX, a Bitcoin denominated stock exchange" (Lightspeed Venture Partners) ; "Omul de afaceri Timisorean Mircea Popescu" which Google translates as "Businessman Timisoara Mircea Popescu" (Cotidianul, seems to be a major Romanian daily) ; "t a Romanian Bitcoin billionaire" (Slashdot, front page) ; "El responsable de MPEx Bitcoin, Mircea Popescu, ha decidido aportar el dinero que necesita el proyecto OpenSDB" (siliconweek) ; "Mircea Popecu, un millonario rumano, ha decidido patrocinar OpenBSD" (unocero) ; "Mircea Popescu, Romanian creator of the MPEx Bitcoin stock exchange" (Ars Tehnica) ; "Mircea Popescu, the creator of the MPEx Bitcoin stock exchange" (hacker news) ; "Le roumain Mircea Popescu fondateur de mpex et détendeur d'un tel nombre de Bitcoin qu'il en serait milliardaire" (linuxfr) ; "že rumunský miliardár Mircea Popescu" (linux-mint-czech) ; "Mircea Popescu. Image: Courtesy Mircea Popescu" (Wired) "On the website bitbet, which is basically a bitcoin-based version of PaddyPower, one bitcoiner has placed a wager aimed squarely at the Oracle of Ohama: that bitcoin will outperform Class A shares of Berkshire Hathaway" (WSJ) ; "Mircea Popescu, the MPEx operator to whom the letter was addressed, confirmed its receipt in an e-mail to Bloomberg News" (Bloomberg) ; " The agency sent MPEx operator Mircea Popescu a letter" (engadget) ; "The owner of the exchange, a Romanian man named Mircea Popescu, declined." (Gawker). Other references provide support tangentially. The notion that this person is not be notable is indefensible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.65.243.5 (talk) 22:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The footnotes seem to establish sufficient coverage to definitely establish notability worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedic reference. Media references to him seem likely to be sustained into the future so long as Bitcoin remains relevant. It should also be noted the the Romanian language sources that mention him do not detract from the notability. He's attracted substantial interest in the Romanian language space in the past and has been gathering a lot of notice in the English language space. Since he doesn't seem to be slowing down on doing big thing or on attracting big headlines, criticism on the basis on notability sounds weak. Mr Wave (Talk - Contribs) 02:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]