Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/EnCASF

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to contribute to clean up of their own or others' copyright violations.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

• {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

• Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
• If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.

• Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
• If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
• If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
• If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
• To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.

• After examining an article:

• replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add {{y}}) or not (add {{n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{y}}.
• Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)

• If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Images

• Examine the images below. For free images:
  • Does the image look non-free? Is it likely the uploader is the copyright holder?
  • Is the image properly licensed and sourced? Be aware of images that say "this image is licensed under X" without specifying who created it.
  • Do a reverse image search using Google Images. Check the license of the source page. Compare the last modified time with the (Commons) upload time.
  • Do a Google image search for phrases that describe the image's contents.
  • See Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion#Addressing suspected copyright infringement on dealing with cases of possible image copyright infringement. There is no need to open a possibly unfree files listing. Administrators may delete images from multiple point infringers presumptively in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Evaluators who are not administrators may section images into a "deletion requested" section for administrator attention.

• For non-free images, determine whether each image meets our non-free content criteria.
  • Note that Commons does not accept non-free content.
• Annotate the listing with the action taken, e.g. if the image was tagged no source write "no source"; if the fair use claim is deemed ok you can write "OK fair use".

Background

EnCASF (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) I came upon this user at WP:CP when an editor experienced in his work area flagged copyright issues in one of his articles. Of the 39 articles to which he substantially contributed, I have found significant copyright infringement in the first four I looked at (including the one that was flagged). Two had been rev deleted before the CCI software was run. Two are listed for review or repair now. One tell may be in the contributor's level of English. He seems to have been quite good for conversational English but not professional, based on his limited conversations here. For example, he uses sentences like "Hope I respond your question!" and "(I am quite bussy to enter every day...I will try to continue my job this weekend)". He may have been operating in good faith, but has taken content from a swathe of copyrighted sources - from websites to print materials. I recommend his material be aggressively pruned given the rate of copying already seen and the divide between his conversational voice and his article voice. An additional concern is that he authored considerable content at the Spanish Wikipedia which may be translated and placed here. While these articles obviously won't be listed here, the material should ideally be checked to see if he had that bad habit on his home wiki as well. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:39, 20 September 2013 (UTC)