Jump to content

Talk:Grojband

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ATSuperFan (talk | contribs) at 02:16, 29 June 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAnimation: Television Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Animated television work group.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

This channel was not involved in the production of this show, as far as I know. Airing it before Teletoon does not change the fact that it is the latter channel that is the original channel. The way this article is currently written in this regard is highly inconsistent with other articles, particularly those for other Teletoon original series. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 17:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since nobody has responded to this, I've attempted to correct things at least partially... Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 13:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Since nobody has responded here in several days, I've gone ahead and made further changes. I would ask that these changes not be reverted without prior discussion here. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 02:19, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 5 July 2013

In the 'written by' section, please correct spelling of Megan Read to Meghan Read 174.118.57.215 (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grojband's return to Cartoon Network

When will Grojband return to Cartoon Network? Wikimaster 3 (talk) 03:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Middle name?

ATSuperFan when is Corey's middle name said in the show? EvergreenFir (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response

It's not ever mentioned in the show. It is however confirmed that his middle name is Jaron by the creators of the show themselves. http://neptoonstudios.tumblr.com/post/79217058729/ive-saw-a-certain-picture-with-coreys-initials Also, in the episode "Dueling Buttons," Corey's initials are seen and his middle name is shown to begin with the letter J so it has technically been in the show.

ATSuperFan (talk) 02:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Band does not think Laney is a boy

Snowy66 - The band does not think Laney is a boy. See 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I never said the band specifically. I meant everyone in the show in general. And even if they know she's not a boy they still treat her like one. It's a very central plot in the series. At the very least it's worth mentioning "people treat her like a boy despite knowing she's a girl" or something along those lines. Snowy66 (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
EvergreenFir - Doesn't the fact that this question has been asked so many times justify that it should be mentioned on the page? Every other Grojband related site has mentioned this, regardless of whether it's 'officially' canon or not, it's a very significant fact. Furthermore I was under the impression that Wikipedia is supposed to be written from an 'out-universe' perspective, this mass interpretation of the Laney gender gag would qualify. Snowy66 (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Snowy66: Sorry didn't see your first reply. I guess I'd have to say we'd need some other source to avoid original research. I know that Corey always uses "guy" and "buddy", but when watching I thought those were just Canadian colloquialisms, not Corey thinking Laney was a boy. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@EvergreenFir:Okay it's a working process, but I'm glad to see you've opened up a bit. Since blogs and forums aren't allowed, what kind of source would be able work for avoiding original research? Snowy66 (talk) 11:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]