Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Shi-min (2nd nomination)

Lee Shi-min

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. Suspected case of self-promotion. The only reliable-sounding source found for this subject during a Google Search is the "Museum of Contemporary Art, Asia", which turned out to be a nonexistent museum which appears to be connected with the artist. Therefore, I have also listed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Museum of Contemporary Art, Asia, apparently created by the same group of sockpuppets. The Lee Shi-min article was previously listed for deletion in 2008, but the result was "Keep" even though the majority of the "keep" votes came from single-purpose accounts which are obvious sockpuppets: User:KWongtawan, User:Bream1, User:Kreisler, possibly associated with the banned User:Abd. Other probable sockpuppets include User:Toraya and User:Kirovsky. I also need to list March of the Dolls for deletion, also a non-notable subject associated with this guy...all in all, a big web of sockpuppets and self-promotion to sift through. Thanks, Citobun (talk) 10:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for reasons given by nominator and reasons I myself gave back in 2008. --Nlu (talk) 12:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks like a hoax, just like the associated "museum" article. -Zanhe (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A7 at best, G3 at worst.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]