Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual harassment in video gaming

Sexual harassment in video gaming

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Heavily one sided, Voting for the article to be recreated as currently it seems to me to be unsalvageable. Article presents one sided view that sexism is rife in the industry and has no counter argument. Article also reads like a personal essay. Retartist (talk) 06:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The notability of the topic, which is amply attested in the cited reliable sources, is not contested. Deletion is not cleanup, and the nominator has not edited the article and has not made any proposal for how the article could be made, in their view, more neutral. No policy-based grounds for deletion exist. Sandstein 07:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notability not in question. Want to re-write the article? I won't stand in your way. Best way to do that would be to propose such an effort on the article talk page and start working collaboratively with other editors there. Not really a WP:TNT situation, this one. St★lwart¹¹¹ 07:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as the topic is thoroughly well documented in reliable sources. Retartist, Articles for deletion is the wrong venue to solve problems with the way articles are written; deleting an article is related to the relevance of the topic at independent venues, not the way Wikipedia editors have covered it (you'll hear old-timers saying "deletion is not clean-up"). Problems with the neutrality of presentation are dealt by improving the article with other points of view. If you have references that support a different narrative, please show them at the article's talk page so that they can be discussed. Diego (talk) 08:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Since when do we clean up articles by deleting them? Kaldari (talk) 09:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly meets GNG just from the sources given in the article. Many more RSes exist on the clearly notable topic. -Thibbs (talk) 11:12, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is not the venue to solve POV problems with articles.Axon (talk|contribs) 11:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]