Jump to content

User talk:Rahfatsalman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rahfatsalman (talk | contribs) at 08:41, 16 October 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Rahfatsalman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Safiel (talk) 14:52, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saleem (Company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saleem (Company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saleem (Company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Itsalleasy (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Aamra (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
Reventtalk 06:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Saleem (Company) (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
Fiddle Faddle 16:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Rahfatsalman, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monique Jeanne Morrow, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irvine, University High School and Phi Kappa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monique Jeanne Morrow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monique Jeanne Morrow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique Jeanne Morrow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  SmartSE (talk) 20:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This user created Godinterest which a blatant paid editor has listed as part of their portfolio of articles here. That makes them an obvious sock and an advertising-only account. SmartSE (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahfatsalman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do apologize for this unwanted situation. I currently work in an IT company and this is my computer at work. Different people login from this same computer so differents ids been logged in. I humbly say that i didn't have any intention to be abusive and advertising. I am trying to develop my writing skills and coding ability which led me to wikipedia. I never demanded any payment for the works i have done. I do understand the limitations and my mistakes. Please provide me my expected help. Gratitude.

Decline reason:

Bullshit. (Note: this is partially based on off-wiki information, please ask me for details). MER-C 13:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm slightly interested in who the other 'ids' are that have been logged in from this user's computer that he is so keen to disassociate from - when they hadn't been mentioned by anyone else that I can see. I've moved the unblock request down to keep the order of posting correct - SmartSE's comment was posted before the request. Peridon (talk) 13:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|reason= Bullshit? This isn't abusive ? Aight, i have other articles live so yes i did contribute wikipedia by obeying all the rules and regulations. Two of them has been flagged, does that mean i had enough time to burn in here? With all due respect i do not have any issue with anyone of you. I was just trying to learn and was making mistakes. I am not so keen to disassociate from my coworkers. In an organization we do work on different tasks. I only know the id of my brother "Reusha007" which has been blocked too. We both were working on an article for the CTO of Cisco Systems. Thanks for your kind help. Rahfatsalman (talk) 08:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]