Jump to content

User talk:Red Phoenix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 77.97.151.145 (talk) at 09:58, 19 October 2014 (Your deletion of the RfC: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2014

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2014, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 30 in Indiana

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article U.S. Route 30 in Indiana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Neonblak -- Neonblak (talk) 02:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 30 in Indiana

The article U.S. Route 30 in Indiana you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:U.S. Route 30 in Indiana for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Neonblak -- Neonblak (talk) 03:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 30 in Indiana

The article U.S. Route 30 in Indiana you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:U.S. Route 30 in Indiana for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Neonblak -- Neonblak (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dreamcast may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Gotham Racing]]'' (the [[spiritual successor|spiritual sequel]]) to ''[[Metropolis Street Racer]]'').<ref>{{cite web|author=Edge Staff|title=The ten best consoles: our countdown of the greatest

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dreamcast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Rosen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of the RfC

My submission of an RfC was discussed with Ritchie333 and he agreed he was ok with it, please see my talk page for the discussion, furthermore it is a very good idea to seek outside opinions as the current editors on both sides are entrenched in their positions. Bringing up an RfC is a totally valid way to spark discussion about improvements to articles which any user can do on any talk page at any time. Your removal of the RfC is vandalism weather you are an admin or not. I am going to restore it again and if it gets removed again I will go to ANI. Please remember Administrators cannot intervene in content disputes. Thanks. 77.97.151.145 (talk) 09:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]