Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiwa Financials
Appearance
- Jiwa Financials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
one primary source fails WP:GNG & WP:CORP. (2 SPA editors incl creator, looks like COI spam) . Even if passed GNG, what's this notable for? Widefox; talk 01:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - this article has been moved to Jiwa (Software).Dialectric (talk) 04:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, a highly inappropriate move as there's an open move request, and this AfD. I objected to the move (by one of the two COI editors) and reverted it. Widefox; talk 10:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: I found one piece of brief coverage from 2004 of another software item integrating with this package, and it is mentioned in a sector list in Bookkeeping for Dummies. These provide independent basic verification, but do not indicate attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 06:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - I wrote the article initially and took care to be factual to avoid COI issues. The lack of notability issue I contest as the article is about a product no less notable than competing products which do have wikipedia articles. Informing the public is an objective of Wikipedia, yes? I think it appropriate then that informing the public of alternate products in the Accounting Software and ERP categories includes the product Jiwa and the publisher, Jiwa Financials.Mikesheen (talk) 09:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)— Mikesheen (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't a strong argument. As you have a COI, I'm not even going to ask which ones and delete them. Widefox; talk 10:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep WP:PRODUCT Numerous independent references around the web including software catalogues and independent forums.