Jump to content

Template talk:LDS70presCURRENT

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ARTEST4ECHO (talk | contribs) at 13:16, 6 November 2014 (→‎Merge discussion: Made change). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconLatter Day Saint movement Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Title

I suggest dropping the "Members of the" portion of the Template:LDS70presCURRENT title. That would make it consistent with the Template:Qof12 title (which doesn't say "Members of the..."), as both infoboxes are describing a body, i.e. the Quorum of the Twelve (a body) and the Presidency of the Seventy (a body). I think this one change would make Template:LDS70presCURRENT fully analogous to Template:Qof12, and Template:LDS70pres‎ analogous to Template:LDSApostles. --TrustTruth (talk) 18:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good suggestion...nice work! --Eustress (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

I suggest that {{LDS70presCURRENT}} be merged into {{LDS70pres}} just as {{LDSfirstpresidencyCURRENT}} was merged into {{LDSfirstpresidency}}. This is a very easy change and it brings 2 related templates into one place that can can be changed when the Presidency is changed, with no loss of information. I did a mock up at User:ARTEST4ECHO/template, including examples and documentation If you look in the "Examples" you can see how this can be done under the {{LDS70pres | current=yes}} example.--- ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My only concern with that is that where we only want the current presidency to be listed, it might be impossible to just list the current presidency instead of all of this information. If you can find a way around this difficulty, then by all means, merge them! --Jgstokes (talk) 22:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]