User talk:MEOGLOBAL

Media of Turkey

The portion you removed from this article was well supported with references. If you remove it again, I'll make an "edit war" complaint about you. If you are uncomfortable about the added section, start a discussion on the article's talk page. Gezginrocker (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some references from specific media group doesn't make it trustworthy source. Also I don't understand how can you threat me by edit war. MEOGLOBAL (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are different references from at least different 5 media groups, including Bloomberg International. I warned you about not to edit war, but you didn't listen. Pro-AKP media is an undeniable truth of Turkey. Since you want it to be hidden, you are the one who is acting because of your political view. You may be an AKP supporter, but you can't hide the current situation of Turkish media. Gezginrocker (talk) 21:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If I would be AKP supporter, I would remove other information who aganist to AKP. 5 years old child can think harder than that. I can clearly understand that what you support by writing this "AKP supporter" to me. I will write this article from bonnet to heels.

You don't have a right to write that to me. Relax. MEOGLOBAL (talk) 21:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not type it to me. MEOGLOBAL (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Media of Turkey article

I protected it because I feel that is better than blocking anybody. If one or both of you were blocked then you can't discuss the problem. So use the articles talk page. Take a look at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. A couple of places may be useful, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard and if you feel that the sources are not good enough then there is Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your level of English

Although you state that "You can contribute with an advanced level of English", it is obvious that your English skills are very poor. Someone with an advanced level of English would not write a sentence like "Media started to it's history within newspaper in Turkey". Or "The unofficial first newspapers published in Turkish and French languages and in Istanbul and Izmir". Or "you will get nothing by bring some specific sentences to here". If you really want to contribute to Wikipedia, I suggest you improve your English. Now you are only doing harm to Wikipedia with your poor English skills. Also, you should add references to what you write. The paragraph you added to the history section didn't have a single reference.

Anlamama ihtimaline karşı Türkçe de yazayım. İngilizcen dökülüyor, son derece zayıf bir durumda. İnsanlar senin kötü İngilizcenle yazdığın şeyleri okumaya mecbur değiller. O yüzden ya İngilizceni geliştir, ya birilerine yazdıklarını çevirttir, ya da bu sevdadan vazgeç. Sen bu kadar kötü bir İngilizce ile yazdıkça otomatikman kaldırılacaktır zaten yazdıkların. Ayrıca kafana göre yazıp koyamazsın, yazdıklarına referans eklemen gerekiyor. Tarih bölümüne yazdığın paragrafta tek bir referans yoktu. Referansı olan bölümleri kaldırıp tek bir referansı bile olmayan bölümler eklemen, Wikipedia'nın işleyişini kavrayamadığını açıkça gösteriyor. Değerli olan vaktimizi senin verdiğin zararları onarmakla geçirmeye mecbur değiliz. Gezginrocker (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you say, I was waiting for confirmation of page protection that's why I didn't add references.

Anlama ihtimaline karşı ben de Türkçe yazayım. Wikipedia görevlileri adına senin konuşturacak ne yaptığını merak ediyorum. Türk kafasında olan biri ile tartışmaya gerek duymuyorum. Değerli olan vakit muhabbetine burada cevap veremiyorum. Bu yazdığıma cevap vermek zorunda değilsin. MEOGLOBAL (talk) 22:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]