User talk:Bladesmulti

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by .

Having fun

I see that you were having fun? ;) Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, time to time. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Classical element Edits

Hi,

I'm replying to your question "What you have found actually unreliable there[1]?" on the Classical element talk page. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 19:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:20, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sushruta Samhita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kasi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiQuiki

Muni Ki Reti is not a Nagar Panchayat anymore. As of 2014 it has become Municipal Board. I recommend the merger the pages of Muni Ki Reti and Dhalwala (often misspelled as Dhaluwala) into the city and Municipal Board of Muni Ki Reti. Hemant Dabral^Talk 04:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where is your citation? See http://udd.uk.gov.in/files/MUNI_KI_RETI_CSP.pdf Page 11. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied there

Hey there, I think it's time for me to be smart then. (Well talk is a forum for your info first of all). And look at that smarter way, don't forget! Mousanonyy (talk) 16:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History of Pakistan: editwar

You seemed to be engaged in an editwar with an IP at this article and the split article he's trying to start... I had started a thread at WT:PAK while tracking the IP's edits where editors with knowledge in the subject area can help resolve it. Kindly see this thread and discuss your reverts there instead of only using edit summaries. --lTopGunl (talk) 07:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had informed ANI about this incident. Remember 1 thing about his changes, no matter how bad they are, they are made in violation of Wikipedia:BLOCKEVASION as his main account(User:HistoryPK14) is still blocked. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I haven't reverted you, but I agree with a possible split in principle (without endorsing whatever content any of you want in there). I'll explain at the discussion further. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Mohanlal, you may be blocked from editing. SultaanPop (talk) 10:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bladesmulti reported by User:SultaanPop (Result: ). Thank you. SultaanPop (talk) 10:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Mohanlal. SultaanPop (talk) 10:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SultaanPop (talk) 11:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bladesmulti. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article List of awards and nominations received by Mohanlal, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SultaanPop (talk) 12:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]