User talk:Bladesmulti/Archive 5

offensive words in nepali

please visit my talk page.user:2001:DA8:8006:1025:40AE:C8B6:438D:344E is using offensive nepali language (but in english letter).Noonspr (talk) 12:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

They are offensive, I have removed the message and warned the IP. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

he is continuing to vandalize changing his ip of same style.Noonspr (talk) 05:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)05:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

What is the name of the new IP? Bladesmulti (talk) 08:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

see the last edit of Shrestha that is done by that ip .you can find many such ips of that format in the history of that article.Noonspr (talk) 11:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Immortality

What was wrong with my edited answers, can you disprove? They are 100% valid... ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Immortal Discoveries (talk • contribs) 06:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Is this a serious question? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:29, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

A newbie question. User:Immortal Discoveries, what's wrong is that you're treating Wikipedia as if it was a private discussion list or your own website. We base all content on what reliable sources say. Not only was it poor content, you provided no reliable source. It was simple unsourced editorializing, and that is not considered reliable encyclopedic content. -- Brangifer (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

I would want to make it prominant on any think page that, we have only 5 senses though and that thinking/thought/ideas are just all (5) senses you get, and that really, thinking/thought/ideas are only choosing or automated mechanics to trigger the linked neurons to make senses in the created you, cause you know you stay existing and so they are in you, the 1 field particle in the brain, since 11 octillion balls are not 1 particle, I am the stuff that hold them together my friend!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Immortal Discoveries (talk • contribs) 00:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Can I have some of whatever you are smoking? -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 14:14, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhyana in Hinduism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dhyana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Etymology Kerala

The etymology which was added by me in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerala was undone by various authors. I could not find proper reasons for undoing that. Hence, I had to revert those changes again. Thanks for informing that wikipedia has a terminology called edit-war. I was not aware of that, and I was not intentionally making a edit war or so. The edits I have made are genuine and there is very well a proof for that in the Kerala site (http://www.stateofkerala.in/kerala_facts/kerala_etymology.php). To add more, this same fact is mentioned in tamil and malayalam version of the same page itself.

I am not sure what is the right process to make the changes for this situation. Any guidelines or help would be appreciated.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jophine89 (talk • contribs) 08:18, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

You should always check talk(page) of the article before you are going to repeat same kind of change. See Talk:Kerala#Section_1._Etymology, your change has been removed by 3 or more editors, you should describe your change there. Bladesmulti (talk) 10:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Could you check out the talk page On Nanda Mythology?

The page of Krishnas adopted father is being abit derailed to the point of his real full name nand baba being totally wipe from the page in place of (Nanda Mythology), The editor gave this excuse:

"The article is based on mythological theory of Lord Krishna's mythological father Nanda. However, the article may have a redirection link to the term Nand Baba"

Looked at jesus adopted father and on the title of his wiki page & its just noted as "saint joseph", without the (condescending brakets), plus the Nanda page seems pretty poor for something which is so important, if im in the wrong i will leave it but if you could pop in and take a look that would great, thanks92.236.96.38 (talk) 15:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

I have removed much of it, there was enough amount of original research and self published citations. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank You Blade, looks much better.92.236.96.38 (talk) 13:06, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Caplock

Having fun

I see that you were having fun? ;) Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, time to time. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Classical element Edits

Hi,

I'm replying to your question "What you have found actually unreliable there[1]?" on the Classical element talk page. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 19:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for writing. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:20, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sushruta Samhita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kasi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiQuiki

Muni Ki Reti is not a Nagar Panchayat anymore. As of 2014 it has become Municipal Board. I recommend the merger the pages of Muni Ki Reti and Dhalwala (often misspelled as Dhaluwala) into the city and Municipal Board of Muni Ki Reti. Hemant Dabral^Talk 04:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Where is your citation? See http://udd.uk.gov.in/files/MUNI_KI_RETI_CSP.pdf Page 11. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Replied there

Hey there, I think it's time for me to be smart then. (Well talk is a forum for your info first of all). And look at that smarter way, don't forget! Mousanonyy (talk) 16:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

History of Pakistan: editwar

You seemed to be engaged in an editwar with an IP at this article and the split article he's trying to start... I had started a thread at WT:PAK while tracking the IP's edits where editors with knowledge in the subject area can help resolve it. Kindly see this thread and discuss your reverts there instead of only using edit summaries. --lTopGunl (talk) 07:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

I had informed ANI about this incident. Remember 1 thing about his changes, no matter how bad they are, they are made in violation of Wikipedia:BLOCKEVASION as his main account(User:HistoryPK14) is still blocked. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Which is why I haven't reverted you, but I agree with a possible split in principle (without endorsing whatever content any of you want in there). I'll explain at the discussion further. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Per Wikipedia:NOT3RR you are allowed to revert any BLP violation and sock edits. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Mohanlal, you may be blocked from editing. SultaanPop (talk) 10:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bladesmulti reported by User:SultaanPop (Result: ). Thank you. SultaanPop (talk) 10:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC) December 2014 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Mohanlal. SultaanPop (talk) 10:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC) This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SultaanPop (talk) 11:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Managing a conflict of interest Hello, Bladesmulti. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article List of awards and nominations received by Mohanlal, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject. All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible. If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems: Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with. Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam). Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies. Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SultaanPop (talk) 12:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bladesmulti reported by User:SultaanPop (Result: ). Thank you. SultaanPop (talk) 13:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Haha, Hi Blades, the noticeboard showed up on my watchlist and I thought you had been blocked, because of an edit summary which said "blocked" - I was a little disappointed to find out it was this guy, not you. Correct decision though. -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 14:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

At 14:55 myself, I had informed the admin about it,[2] result should be Filer blocked. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

That would not have misled me. -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 15:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

You're getting better and better :) Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bladesmulti reported by User:HarrisonBotani (Result: ). Thank you. HarrisonBotani (talk) 15:16, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Satyananda Saraswati

Could we have an open conversation at Talk:Satyananda_Saraswati instead of just reverting content? The talk area is to have those discussions instead of just jumping ahead to delete content. Totocol (talk) 10:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

I had already replied a few minutes ago. Bladesmulti (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Pashupati seal

Thanks for bringing the Pashupati seal article to my attention!
I plan to work on it, especially expanding the post-Marshall schools of thought/analysis part, as and when I get the time over the next few weeks. For now I have edited the page a bit to restore some parts that reflect the overall literature on the subject (not all of which is detailed in the article yet, due to my "interrupted" work), and undid this IP vandalism, which reversed the summary of current opinion on the subject! I also ended up removing a couple of sources you had added, not because they were unreliable (as you perhaps know, Gavin Flood and the Blackwell companion to Hinduism are some of my go-to sources), but because it would be better to concentrate on sources/authors who have specialized in the subject rather than ones who only deal with it cursorily. I hope you'll indulge me a bit while I work on the updating the article (not immediately; in the coming weeks) and not mind these partial-reversions. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 14:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for writing. There is a need to look into another related sections, the one you mentioned from IVC. Gavin Flood is a nice author, he is an expert too, it is noted that Mohenjodero was a part of IVC, that's why I had included the IVC instead and cited Gavin Flood, it is possible to find "IVC" in more relevant citations. Also one of the section included the praises of Marshall's analysis, so I happened to add about the Herbert Sullivan's quote, but couldn't really find where he was rejecting the analysis, he was rather raising doubts. Today I was also reading about John Keay's writings about Marshall's analysis, he did admitted that "It is maybe indeed" correct, however he writes that Rudra was not ascetic. There are some good agreements and few disagreements. Hope to solve these few issues, there are no hurries. I am happy that I have found good subject to study. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

• Oh, IVC is certainly correct as you say, and perhaps the lede should contain a reference to IVC for readers who may not realize that Mohenjodaro is an IVC site. Will add it myself, once Bishonen is done wworking on the page.
• The Sullivan reference and quote you added is perfectly good. I just moved it in the paragraph to reflect the chronological order. More broadly: since the scholarly opinion on the Pashupati seal has evolved over time, it is necessary to take into account the time at which an article/book was written in order to get an accurate picture of this very interesting area of research. That's also a reason to stick, as far as possible, to high quality and specialist sources on the subject, since dilettantes are often either not aware of the range of opinions, or for ideological reasons, choose to selectively quote scholars in the area.
• As the Keay/Possehl quotes indicate, Marshall's view has not been refuted exactly; more akin to his view being diluted by counter-proposals and objections. A "final" determination of what the seal represents, and more broadly the nature of the IVC religion, will perhaps have to await the decipherment of the Indus script.

Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 15:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Auto-archive

Hi Blades. Are yoy able to put an auto-archive at Talk:Karma in Buddhism? Somehow those things don't work when I try it. Thanks! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:40, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Created Talk:Karma in Buddhism/Archive 1 and inserted a auto archiving bot. Seems like a lot of discussion has been made recently. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Discussion?... See also what went wrong with auto-archiving. Thanks! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

[[Talk:Talk:, had to be be just [[Talk:. But yes you had repaired it. Bladesmulti (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

It works! It works! (I'd spelled "Talk:Rgo death", instead of "Talk:Ego death") Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nepali language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}
• ] |isbn=0-8444-0777-1 |url=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/bttoc.html |accessdate=2010-10-02}}</ref>) Since the late 1980s, over 100,000 Lhotshampas have been forced out of [[Bhutan]], accused by the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your useless comment on my talk page

I was talking to the other person informing him/her that the "FACT" that as per "ABOVE" discussion there on talk page of "INDIA", there has been "NO USE" of Hindi being the Indian Official language. My talk page is not a platform to warn me. And reply to the questions I have posed rather than trying to rootle out flaws in my comments Mousanonyy (talk) 12:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Neither of your comments were helpful, that's why I had removed them. One of the editor(regentspark) had actually thanked me for that. You are allowed to express your concerns, but you are not allowed to discourage other editors, make irrelevant discussions and cast allegations. Before you make changes on this article, you have to discuss them first. This is not a rule, but there has been always a mutual understanding for this article. Now anyone who will see your recent change to this article will also view the talk(page), and observer if your changes were proposed first and they have gained some agreement. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Please check mail

Hello, Bladesmulti. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--AmritasyaPutra^T 05:45, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Please check mail

Hello, Bladesmulti. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Sdmarathe (talk) 09:25, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You deserve a barnstar. Regads. -- Tito☸Dutta 10:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Now that's cool! I'm glad that your contributions are appreciated! Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:16, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Help!

hello! I received your notification regarding the mediation committee's decision regarding the page "sharabha".I am relatively new to wikipedia and although I went through discretionary sanctions I failed to understand the committee's decision.Does this mean I can remove the sections of the disputed page which are clearly too harsh,without attracting a block or some other penalty? 12:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankisur2 (talk • contribs)

You can remove that message if you want to. It is just a notification that you are editing in a area that is under the Wikipedia:ARBCOM sanctions. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Question about topics involving "pseudoscience" and a sanction warning

Just a quick question to help me understand the sanction warning you added here [3] - how are sanctions imposed? Can any editor warn another editor if the topic is about pseudoscience, or is highly controversial? Thank you in advance. Atsme☯^Consult 19:26, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)The warning template is a procedural thing, once issued to an editor, said editor can be sanctioned under the arbcom ruling on pseudosciemce without further notice. Anybody can issue them to anybody who edits in those areas under the ruling "broadly defined" as I recall. You could issue one to me, or I to you because we both have edited the Griffin page, which probably falls under the broadly construed sanctions. Blades was being a little cheeky by issuing one to me, as he totally knows I understand the arbcom sanctions. An editor should not receive more than one per year though. -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 19:47, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the response. Atsme☯^Consult 22:34, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Atsme, if the subject falls under any of the sanctions that have been noted here on Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Current areas of conflict, then you can remind about them by using any of the template that are listed at Template:Ds/topics/table. Whenever you will file a report on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement‎ you will have to show if the targeted user had been reminded under 12 months or else the report will be rejected. Even in AN or ANI, it is important if not required. Sometimes in the wake of new surprising events, some users lose their ability to contribute neutrally, it is further required that an uninvolved admin would impose restrictions in place of going to Wikipedia:ARE and its procedures. Bladesmulti (talk) 22:37, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh, ok - understood. Thank you. Atsme☯^Consult 22:42, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

I have come to the realization that perhaps I do not understand the reason for all the steps in sanctioning as well as I first thought. It appears to be a series of notifications from which no action is actually taken until.....what occurs???? My disappointment over the latter somehow led me to find the following: [4] which is lingo I actually comprehend. Atsme☯^Consult 23:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Ayurveda

Greetings! Sorry for the stupid question since this is what I've always taken for granted, but.... we do require MEDRS compliant sources at Ayurveda for claims on medical efficiency, right? I was glancing through the past discussions but never found anything to affirm this. The only discussion I could recall is whether the whole article should fall under MEDRS or not, and that's something that I opposed. Or perhaps I am confusing this one with another article (like Talk:Electronic cigarette)? Well, cheers anyway! :-) Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 21:44, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

It is just recommended by a lot of editors to use MEDRS for efficacy, medical benefits, etc. You can still write about them if your citations are reliable. It is important for an article to have each of its citations reliable. I don't know about Electronic cigarette's citations, but there is some extended discussion about its sourcing on Wikipedia:RSN at this moment. Bladesmulti (talk) 22:18, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh... Indeed, it was in electronic cigarette. Anyway, there was a similar attempt to get the article wholly under MEDRS, which failed however. At that article I argued that only the "claims on medical efficiency" should fall under MEDRS. I was thinking about suggesting a similar treatment in regards to Ayurveda. For example, when there'd be a claim, such as "Ayurveda is efficient in treatment of cancer", a MEDRS compliant source would be advisable.

At the moment, though, the article includes statements like "To maintain health, a Sattvic diet can be prescribed to the patient." or "...dinacharya stresses the importance of natural cycles (waking, sleeping, working, meditation etc.) for a healthy living.". I don't think these would fall under MEDRS, as they are merely reporting about the Ayurvedic believes. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 23:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes it is very obvious that they are only providing the basic reasoning behind these concepts: that why they are used. Electronic cigarette has been discussed around, on DRN, RSN, ANI and also John's talk. I think page ownership has just made it harder to make any changes. Bladesmulti (talk) 02:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

PS - I think I may have crossed paths with Tim Hancock, if only in my dreams. Atsme☯^Consult 23:28, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is below the thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Thinkmaths reported by User:Vigyani (Result: ). Thank you.Thinkmaths (talk) 08:43, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Also file a report about Shrikanthv.[5] Bladesmulti (talk) 08:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Satyananda Saraswati

I'm not quite sure how familiar you are with Wikipedia but there is abaolutely nothing wrong with adding information related to open hearings from an official source as information that is relevant to someone's biography. You continue undoing additions from myself and other editors without any real reason. From what I can see in your history this seems to be a topic that is important for you but it is more important to remain relevant — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totocol (talk • contribs) 01:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Those gossips are not relevant, but random. Bladesmulti (talk) 02:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Would be great if you engage in the discussions we are having in the talk area at Satyananda Saraswati — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totocol (talk • contribs) 20:09, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Best wishes for a happy holiday season II Just for fun.

		Happy Holiday Cheer
		Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an Awesome Holiday and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! Joys!Hafspajen (talk) 02:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Xmas! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

This was stupid: I thanked you for your revert at Sitush's talkpage, but by mistake I first thanked the editor who posted the "legal notice".... Anyway: thanks! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:30, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Don't think he will check, it was just another duck account. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	You deserve this barnstar,. -- Tito☸Dutta 08:48, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Titodutta! Bladesmulti (talk) 13:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Straw Poll

Please consider participating in the straw poll at Talk:Satyananda Saraswati#Straw poll on "Controversy" section. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Bankim & Iswar

Hi, I wonder what's your argument for making the nationality of Bankim & Iswar as Indian. They were born and died before the birth of India in 1947. I could be wrong though. I will really appreciate if you please explain your stand on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoshanko (talk • contribs) 09:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Born in India, and their parents were also Indians. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) While you do have a valid point, Shoshanko but you might not be aware that before the Independence of India in 1947 all princely states and British India (including Pakistan, Bangladesh) is refered as India. You will find more information in [Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar (2004), From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India, New Delhi and London: Orient Longmans. ISBN 978-81-250-2596-2.]. Since they were born during British Raj which then refered as India so it is not unreasonable that they are Indians. Thanks, Jim Carter 08:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Baklava is a rich, sweet pastry made of layers of filo pastry filled with chopped nuts and sweetened with syrup or honey. Thanks for your contributions. Hafspajen (talk) 09:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	The Teamwork Barnstar is awarded when several editors work together to improve Wikipedia. Hafspajen (talk) 09:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Long-term hoaxer/disruptive editor

Response to your final comment at WP:ANI.

Not knowing anything of these different cultures, I wasn't willing to treat them as anything beyond the addition of unsourced material; that's why I wanted more explanation from the IP even though I'd seen the diffs. I didn't think a longer block warranted: aside from blatant vandals and spammers, I'm generally not in favor of indefinite blocks the first time around. I'd rather give the guy a block long enough to notice — I placed the block around midnight here in the eastern US, figuring that he's probably in India or nearby parts of the world, so something like twelve hours away from me, and 36 hours means through the end of tomorrow his time. You probably saw my note above yours at his talk page; I don't want to lock the door and throw away the key, since it's always possible that he didn't understand sanctions and/or didn't care, but I think it's a waste of time to work with this kind of unrepentant people if they just go back to the same hoaxing after the block expires, so that's why I basically promised an indefinite block for recidivism.

Just curious: you've twice raised the spelling of Peshawar/Peshewer. My initial impression is that it's perhaps a transliteration issue, especially given the difficulties of transliterating vowels when we start with an abjad like the Arabic alphabet. Why is it more significant than that? Nyttend (talk) 13:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Peshawar is the right spelling and he wrote Peshewer just every time whenever he would mention the location, though the word is pretty easy to spell though. I had asked him that why he spelled it differently, lets see what he will say. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Appreciate the heads up on the cattle article. No clue. New editor though, and interested in the topic (note contribs). I suspect over-enthusiastic wikignome. Also a possibility that they are willing to actually do the work, so I'm Ok with monitoring for now. WP:FARM needs more content contributors, so if mentoring works, that is a good thing. Montanabw^(talk) 16:41, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes he seems like a nice user. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

List of Comedy Nights with Kapil episodes

Please stop removing the serial number. It is more readable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradip garala (talk • contribs) 15:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Its not necessary to give citation for each every episodes. Please refer other articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradip garala (talk • contribs) 15:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Not a matter, that change was made by IP and it was new. Where's the agreement? Bladesmulti (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

sorry, what type of agreement ? pradipgarala (talk) 15:40, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

You need agreement for every contested change, and not only I but one more editor disagreed with you. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

I am not asking any agreement, but you asked me for agreement, and what is that ? pradipgarala (talk) 15:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:CONSENSUS. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I read that and Its true. pradipgarala (talk) 16:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Who's socking on this page right now? Bladesmulti (talk) 18:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hinduism in Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indo-Iranian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Bladesmulti!

Happy New Year!

Bladesmulti,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Hafspajen (talk) 10:06, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year! JimRenge (talk) 20:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Happy New Year to both of you! Bladesmulti (talk) 21:58, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Tibetan culture

Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at Talk:Tibetan culture.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hafspajen (talk) 13:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Blade will assist at the Tibetan culture? Hafspajen (talk) 14:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Just looked into it. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Enneagram

Blades, which Enneagram type are you? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:23, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

5th one. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

And you, Josh ? Hafspajen (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

5? Okay, fits the picture. I'm a 4, with a strong 5-wing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Ah. That explains EVERYTHING: Hafspajen (talk) 12:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Sure? And you? Also a 4? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

• 7. Hafspajen (talk) 13:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

But some guy who made a test once said 9 actually, now I remembered. Hafspajen (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Well, well

A well is a hole in the ground that you get either clean water or dirty oil out of. In your case, the Notification feature told me that you had put a message on my talk page. On research, it appears that you subtracted a post from my talk page. It appears that an IP had posted to AN or ANI, and that I had notified the IP that they should have notified the subject, and I notified the subject, and the IP then said that they had forgotten to notify. Now you removed the message from the IP, because the IP has been determined to be a sockpuppet for a user who was banned in 2007. Any user who was banned that long ago could get unbanned if they would just be quiet for a year without engaging in sockpuppetry. I know that in general it is a policy that posts by banned users can be reverted. In this case, I think that reverting the post was neutral, neither useful nor harmful, but if reverting everything is simpler than selecting what to revert, that is all right. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for writing. Bladesmulti (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Editing Articles

As you stated on the user page, you should let others edit your articles. Possessiveness of articles is covered by the policy on article ownership and is not permitted. Editing the articles in the articles is normally a minor edit. It is typically only necessary if English was a second language for the original author. In the Latin Wikipedia, there are no articles in the articles. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes and I never had a problem with that. Bladesmulti (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The dirt hits the fan

Now let's see where the shit comes down... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes it is troubling and some of them are autoconfirmed users. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Tibetan culture

Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at Talk:Tibetan culture.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. Joshua Jonathan ‎ - please you too. I think we need to adopt a Tibetan. I don't want to leave a message on your talk because certain editors there might make this into a controversy very soon, I do not wish to get this newbie bitten. Hafspajen (talk) 13:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

I could do better only if I had more time because I am currently dealing with multiple sock masters. Although still check every article where I am actually interested. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

• OK; when you fixed that, than. Socking is a major dishonesty and suks.Hafspajen (talk) 15:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)