User talk:Hipocrite

Hello, Hipocrite. Your no-talkback edit notice is constantly ignored.

Facepalm

Template:No automated talkback

I do check my Wikipedia-related email, to those who ask. I don't typically do what emailers want.

You will remove talkback notices every time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. They will never stop.

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by .

Copyedit

I think it should have been "Gamergate-related" rather than "Gamergate related". Not that I'm editing that article or anything :) Guettarda (talk) 21:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All the other ones look that way, so yeah, probably should have been. Hipocrite (talk) 21:15, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GamerGate controversy

Regarding your edit on Gamergate controversy, since these chan forums are anonymous, it's really hard to state that a minority coordinated actions against those who opposed the movement. Is that a minority of everyone who ever used the hashtag? Or a minority of those posting on the online forums? This question goes beyond your edit to a statement that a minority of people/users/redditors/channers? participated. I think this wording is in place to locate the harassment in a few "bad apples" but the truth is that no one, reliable or not, can quantify how many people participated in sending harassing emails, Tweets, phone calls or letters. I think "by a minority" should be removed since that statement can't be supported. Do you agree or should I move this to the article talk page? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the only citation is that the number of people actively doing bad things are a minority of people affiliated with the movement, which I think is trivially true. I mean, the number of people who actively do anything related to activism is always smaller than the number of people who passively do something related to joining. I think it's shitty wording, and I'd love to start reverting on the article, but I'm not going to be the guy who gets banned, because I forsee the hammer coming and I intend to accumulate a massive amount of not-reverted edits to point to as the good guy. Hipocrite (talk) 22:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

Do they...not notice that I have a talk page that even specifies where I'm editing from? They already doxxed Ryulong, it should be fairly obvious that Ryulong doesn't live where I am explicitly stated to live.

Jesus. I heard they were bad at jumping to hilariously unsupported conclusions, but...jesus.192.249.47.186 (talk) 13:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]