User talk:Hipocrite/01/2015

FYI

I've restored all prior edits of User talk:Iipmstudent9. Not sure you'll find anything useful there, but no harm in putting those 12 edits back. Courcelles 22:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. That was pretty boring. I've requested leave to withdraw my evidence section. Hipocrite (talk) 23:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

You can remove (or hat would be better since Courcelles used it in his undelete reason) your own evidence section as you see fit. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Max Read

Hey, thanks for removing that misleading segment from the Max Read article. My intent wasn't to defame as I've had nice email conversations with them in the past. I should've added more from the article for the reader to understand the reason for their "ranking".DrWho42 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Neutral notification

You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at Template talk:Infobox officeholder/Archive 18#RfC on successor/predecessor where a district is not reasonably viewed as the same after redistricting. Please see a related discussion at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#RfC Congressmen's tenures in infobox. Kraxler (talk) 15:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your proposals on RfA recall

I take them seriously and would like to generate preliminary discussion on them prior to taking them to relevant boards. Your input would be welcomed. We must act as a community if there is any chance of improving existing flawed or fudged procedures. Your positive input would be welcomed, certainly by me. Regards Irondome (talk) 02:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thanks. Your solution looked into the core of the problem and solved it. This merits an instance of Wikilove! Diego (talk) 18:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

No longer spamming HJ Mitchell's talk page

Thanks for your patience btw in dealing with a noob. I know you have mentioned dealing with vandals trolling Ryulong, but I just saw an actual good edit to make after someone else made a horrible mistake a few weeks ago. Decided to say thanks here instead of spamming that admins talk page forever with back and forth.FlossumPossum (talk) 06:26, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Account

I have had an account in the past, but stopped editing with it specifically because of the amount of harassment I was getting from vandals (pre-Gamergate). Although I doubt anyone is going to actually care about my meager edits, given the history on this article I'm not at all inclined to identify myself with an account. Remembering not to edit from my phone is easy enough.192.249.47.186 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Cool. Not having an account is up to you, but given your history of positive contributions, an account would likley help. Hipocrite (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

:/

Just to let you know, it looks like you're going to be one of the people they're targeting now. See here and here. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Silverseren^C 10:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

I expected as much. Not even stressed. Thanks for the concern! Hipocrite (talk) 12:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

@Silver seren: Oh, hey talkpage stalkers (er, actually, the whole world) - above is proof that people can disagree loudly about things in the past and still be human to eachother at the end of the day. Hipocrite (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

SPI

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ryulong. Thank you. Stickee (talk) 01:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Case now deleted. Stickee (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)