Jump to content

Wikipedia:Deletion review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Stanfordandson (talk | contribs) at 07:59, 23 July 2006 (→‎Decisions to be reviewed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Header

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Content review

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Multimedia Information

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Contested prod

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/History only undeletion

Decisions to be reviewed

Shortcut

Instructions

Before listing a review request, please:

  1. Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer as this could resolve the matter more quickly. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision.
  2. Check that it is not on the list of perennial requests. Repeated requests every time some new, tiny snippet appears on the web have a tendency to be counter-productive. It is almost always best to play the waiting game unless you can decisively overcome the issues identified at deletion.

Steps to list a new deletion review

 
1.

Click here and paste the template skeleton at the top of the discussions (but not at the top of the page). Then fill in page with the name of the page, xfd_page with the name of the deletion discussion page (leave blank for speedy deletions), and reason with the reason why the discussion result should be changed. For media files, article is the name of the article where the file was used, and it shouldn't be used for any other page. For example: 

{{subst:drv2
|page=File:Foo.png
|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 19#Foo.png
|article=Foo
|reason=
}} ~~~~
2.

Inform the editor who closed the deletion discussion by adding the following on their user talk page:

{{subst:DRV notice|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~
3.

For nominations to overturn and delete a page previously kept, attach <noinclude>{{Delrev|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude> to the top of the page under review to inform current editors about the discussion.

4.

Leave notice of the deletion review outside of and above the original deletion discussion:

  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is the same as the deletion review's section header, use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude>
  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is different from the deletion review's section header, then use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16|page=SECTION HEADER AT THE DELETION REVIEW LOG}}</noinclude>
 

Commenting in a deletion review

Any editor may express their opinion about an article or file being considered for deletion review. In the deletion review discussion, please type one of the following opinions preceded by an asterisk (*) and surrounded by three apostrophes (''') on either side. If you have additional thoughts to share, you may type this after the opinion. Place four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your entry, which should be placed below the entries of any previous editors:

  • Endorse the original closing decision; or
  • Relist on the relevant deletion forum (usually Articles for deletion); or
  • List, if the page was speedy deleted outside of the established criteria and you believe it needs a full discussion at the appropriate forum to decide if it should be deleted; or
  • Overturn the original decision and optionally an (action) per the Guide to deletion. For a keep decision, the default action associated with overturning is delete and vice versa. If an editor desires some action other than the default, they should make this clear; or
  • Allow recreation of the page if new information is presented and deemed sufficient to permit recreation.

Examples of opinions for an article that had been deleted:

  • *'''Endorse''' The original closing decision looks like it was sound, no reason shown here to overturn it. ~~~~
  • *'''Relist''' A new discussion at AfD should bring a more thorough discussion, given the new information shown here. ~~~~
  • *'''Allow recreation''' The new information provided looks like it justifies recreation of the article from scratch if there is anyone willing to do the work. ~~~~
  • *'''List''' Article was speedied without discussion, criteria given did not match the problem, full discussion at AfD looks warranted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and merge''' The article is a content fork, should have been merged into existing article on this topic rather than deleted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and userfy''' Needs more development in userspace before being published again, but the subject meets our notability criteria. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn''' Original deletion decision was not consistent with current policies. ~~~~

Remember that deletion review is not an opportunity to (re-)express your opinion on the content in question. It is an opportunity to correct errors in process (in the absence of significant new information), and thus the action specified should be the editor's feeling of the correct interpretation of the debate. Deletion review is facilitated by succinct discussions of policies and guidelines; long or repeated arguments are not generally helpful. Rather, editors should set out the key policies and guidelines supporting their preferred outcome.

The presentation of new information about the content should be prefaced by Relist, rather than Overturn and (action). This information can then be more fully evaluated in its proper deletion discussion forum. Allow recreation is an alternative in such cases.

Temporary undeletion

Admins participating in deletion reviews are routinely requested to restore deleted pages under review and replace the content with the {{TempUndelete}} template, leaving the history for review by everyone. However, copyright violations and violations of the policy on biographies of living persons should not be restored.

Closing reviews

A nominated page should remain on deletion review for at least seven days, unless the nomination was a proposed deletion. After seven days, an administrator will determine whether a consensus exists. If that consensus is to undelete, the admin should follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Administrator instructions. If the consensus was to relist, the page should be relisted at the appropriate forum. If the consensus was that the deletion was endorsed, the discussion should be closed with the consensus documented.

If the administrator closes the deletion review as no consensus, the outcome should generally be the same as if the decision was endorsed. However:

  • If the decision under appeal was a speedy deletion, the page(s) in question should be restored, as it indicates the deletion was not uncontroversial. The closer, or any editor, may then proceed to nominate the page at the appropriate deletion discussion forum, if they so choose.
  • If the decision under appeal was an XfD close, the closer may, at their discretion, relist the page(s) at the relevant XfD.

Ideally all closes should be made by an administrator to ensure that what is effectively the final appeal is applied consistently and fairly but in cases where the outcome is patently obvious or where a discussion has not been closed in good time it is permissible for a non-admin (ideally a DRV regular) to close discussions. Non-consensus closes should be avoided by non-admins unless they are absolutely unavoidable and the closer is sufficiently experienced at DRV to make that call. (Hint: if you are not sure that you have enough DRV experience then you don't.)

Speedy closes

  • Objections to a proposed deletion can be processed immediately as though they were a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
  • Where the closer of a deletion discussion realizes their close was wrong, and nobody has endorsed, the closer may speedily close as overturn. They should fully reverse their close, restoring any deleted pages if appropriate.
  • Where the nominator of a DRV wishes to withdraw their nomination, and nobody else has recommended any outcome other than endorse, the nominator may speedily close as "endorse" (or ask someone else to do so on their behalf).
  • Certain discussions may be closed without result if there is no prospect of success (e.g. disruptive or sockpuppet nominations, if the nominator is repeatedly nominating the same page, or the page is listed at WP:DEEPER). These will usually be marked as "administrative close".

23 July 2006

22 July 2006

21 July 2006

20 July 2006

19 July 2006

18 July 2006

Recently concluded

2006 July

  1. Image:Rivers_cuomo.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  2. Image:KarazhanInterior01.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  3. American Cliche - Deletion endorsed. 14:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  4. Trae - Deletion endorsed. 14:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  5. California State Normal School - Deletion endorsed. 14:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  6. Talk:Brian Peppers - talk page of deleted article; speedy closed. 15:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  7. Dennis Allen - Contested PROD; speedy restored. 15:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  8. Template:User NDP - Userfied per GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User NDP. 14:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  9. Template:User Socialist - Deletion endorsed; already userfied per GUS. 14:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  10. Articles for deletion - Leave as a redlink. 14:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  11. Zazz - Deletion endorsed. 14:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  12. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Frank Weltner - Speedy restored as clear error. 15:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  13. Punjabi Prison Match - Deletion endorsed. 14:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  14. Carleton Student Engineering Society - Deletion endorsed. 14:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  15. Encyclopedia Dramatica - Deletion endorsed. 15:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  16. Susan Fogarty - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 14:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  17. The Rabbit Joint - Deletion endorsed. 14:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  18. Mega Society - Deletion endorsed (New users, solicited votes were discounted.) 15:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  19. Corona Regis - Deletion endorsed. 15:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  20. Musa Cooper - Speedy deletion overturned; listed at AfD. 15:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  21. C-Tec - Contested PROD, restored and AfDed. 15:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  22. Angry Nintendo Nerd - Deletion endorsed. 15:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  23. Kingdom of Talossa - Deletion endorsed. 15:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  24. Victoria Crawford - Deletion endorsed. 15:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  25. Wikipedia:Jimbo makes mistakes - Listed at MfD; result was userfication. 16:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  26. Roger Maloney - Deletion endorsed. 16:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  27. Teutonic thrash - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  28. Template:Title - Speedy deletion overturned by original deleter. 16:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  29. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways or Category:Freeways and motorways - Closure of "no consensus" endorsed. 16:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  30. Question mark glitches in Pokémon - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  31. Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe - Deletion endorsed. 15:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  32. Pirate Party of the United States - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  33. Ampfea - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  34. TMNT Engine - Sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMNT Engine; Deleted by AfD. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  35. Tourette's Guy - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  36. King's Highway (Ontario) → List of Ontario provincial highways - relisted at RfD. 17:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  37. Joel Leyden - Deletion endorsed. 17:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  38. List of vegetarians - Deletion endorsed. 17:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  39. Jews did WTC - Deletion endorsed. 17:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  40. StarCraft units and structures - Deletion endorsed. 17:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  41. List of film clichés by genre - Deletion endorsed. 17:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  42. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  43. List of strike-breakers - Deletion endorsed. 17:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  44. Guitar World's 100 greatest guitar solos - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  45. Joseph Patrick Moore - Relisted at AfD. 14:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  46. Big Brother 7 chronology - Deletion endorsed. 14:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  47. File:Cat in the hat with a bong.jpg - Deletion endorsed. 14:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  48. Colorado Rockies (NHL) - Speedy restored by original deleter. 14:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  49. List of language speakers - Three late addition to a CfD (Catalan, Welsh, Latin) relisted; other deletions endorsed. 13:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  50. No personal attacks - Maintain status quo (redirect to Personal attacks.) 13:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  51. Bruce Shand - New recreation permitted by acclamation. 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  52. List of Sci Fi Channel (United States) programs - Restored; relisted for AfD. 16:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  53. Alyssa Miller - Disputed PROD restored, sent to AfD. 16:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  54. Michael Laitman - Deletion endorsed. 16:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  55. Eddit Merkleberger - speedy closed, kept deleted. Review 14:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  56. User:Riddley - Speedy restored; simple misunderstanding. 17:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review[reply]
  57. User:Micoolio101/Supporters_in_the_death_of_OrphanBot - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 17:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  58. myg0t - speedily closed due to a previous review closing only two hours prior. 19:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  59. Talifan - Consensus at DRV was to transwiki to wicktionary; however, article has been deleted there. Article will, thus, be listed for AfD (its first listing) as an alternative. 16:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  60. Club Penguin - Deletion endorsed. 16:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  61. Everywhere Girl - Deletion endorsed. 16:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  62. Kevin Zeese - Redirect result overturned; article restored (NB: This is merely an editorial decision; a consensus on the article's talk page is a better authority on this question than DRV.) 16:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  63. Department of Chemical Engineering & Technology - Deletion endorsed. 16:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  64. myg0t - Deletion endorsed. 16:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  65. Futuristic Sex Robotz - Deletion endorsed, without prejudiced to future DRV should circumstances change. 15:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  66. Various x-ns redirects to process pages - Deletion Overturned and relisted on RFD 03:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  67. Cyanide and Happiness - Deletion endorsed. 15:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  68. Kitty May Ellis - Keep closure overturned unanimously (including original closer), article deleted. 15:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  69. Aristasia - Deletion endorsed, without prejudice to properly sourced recreation. 15:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  70. First image on the Web - Overturned; relisted. 16:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  71. Lumber Cartel - Speedy keep result overturned; relisted. 16:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  72. Case of English pronouns - Redirect result overturned; relisted. 16:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  73. Doctor Who New Series 3 - Keep result overturned; since no single action after overturn had a consensus behind it, this is relisted. 16:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  74. Sharon Janis - Original deletion endorsed; rewrite submitted to new AfD. 15:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  75. Infoware - Keep closure endorsed. 15:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  76. Image:Popebenedettoencyclical.jpg - Keep closure overturned; image deleted as improper fair use. 22:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  77. Law School Ranking deletes - Deletion (as copyvio) endorsed. 22:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  78. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways - Relisted at CfD by original closer. 22:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  79. A Course in Miracles (book) - Recreation of redirect permitted. 22:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  80. King's Highway (Ontario) - Redirect restored. 22:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  81. Fucked Fucked Company - Deletion endorsed. 22:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  82. List of commercial seduction teachers - Deletion endorsed. 22:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  83. Vokzal - Deletion endorsed. 18:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  84. List_of_relationships_with_age_disparity - Deletion closure endorsed. 18:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  85. Freebord - PROD overturned; listed at AfD; kept at AfD. 18:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  86. Template:unblockabuse - Speedy keep closure endorsed. 18:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  87. Brilliant prose - History merged. 18:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  88. Template:Good article - Deletion endorsed. 17:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  89. OS 0 1 2 - Relisted at AfD. 17:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  90. Image_talk:Canada_flag_large.png - History merged. 17:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  91. Eon8 - Deletion endorsed. 17:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  92. Jim Weathers - Deletion endorsed. 17:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  93. LinkStation - Deletion endorsed. 17:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  94. Category:Women of Pakistan - Deletion overturned; relisted at CfD. 17:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  95. Pyongyang Hotel - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  96. Kat Shoob - Original deletion endorsed; new, different recreation now at AfD. 16:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  97. Cashville Records - Deletion endorsed. 16:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  98. Late Night Killers - Deletion endorsed. 16:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  99. What Really Happened - Deletion endorsed. 16:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  100. Sunday (David Bowie song) - Tiny minority endorsed closure, majority support for other action. Therefore, relisted at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday (David Bowie song) 22:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  101. Economic totalitarianism - back at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic totalitarianism (4th nomination) 15:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  102. Aaron Walton - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  103. Englewood Schools - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  104. Robin Fletcher - speedy deletion endorsed. 03:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  105. Nigga Know Technology - deletion endorsed. 03:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  106. Chinese Pig - deletion endorsed. 03:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  107. Ben Shuldiner - deletion endorsed. 02:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC) review
  108. List of United States musicians and sublists - undeleted and relisted on AfD. 12:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  109. Lumber Cartel - current AfD reopened, review speedily closed. Closure now subject of further DRV. 22:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  110. Articles for deletion - endorsed 14:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  111. Mark Steere - Author requested deletion. 16:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  112. Burnt Face Man - Deletion endorsed. 14:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  113. User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky - Userfied per WP:GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky. 13:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  114. Research_into_health_benefits_of_Falun_Gong - Deletion endorsed. 14:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  115. Barra binte Samawal - Undeleted, to be listed at AfD. 14:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  116. Piccolo (coloratura) - Contested Prod; undeleted, now at AfD. 14:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  117. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 14:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  118. An Offer You Can't Refuse - Deletion endorsed. 14:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  119. Arbor View High School - Improved recreation permitted. 18:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  120. Frank Morano - Deletion endorsed. 18:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  121. Names of cities in different languages - Deletion closures overturned. 18:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  122. RuneScape armour - No consensus closure endorsed. 17:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  123. Jesse B. Davis - Recreation reinstated at article title. 17:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  124. Sahaba's ancestors - Deletion endorsed. 16:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  125. Gilles Trehin - Unprotect, allow recreation. (Stub will put in place in meantime.) 16:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review

Archives

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Header

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Content review

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Multimedia Information

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Contested prod

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/History only undeletion

Decisions to be reviewed

Shortcut

Instructions

Before listing a review request, please:

  1. Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer as this could resolve the matter more quickly. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision.
  2. Check that it is not on the list of perennial requests. Repeated requests every time some new, tiny snippet appears on the web have a tendency to be counter-productive. It is almost always best to play the waiting game unless you can decisively overcome the issues identified at deletion.

Steps to list a new deletion review

 
1.

Click here and paste the template skeleton at the top of the discussions (but not at the top of the page). Then fill in page with the name of the page, xfd_page with the name of the deletion discussion page (leave blank for speedy deletions), and reason with the reason why the discussion result should be changed. For media files, article is the name of the article where the file was used, and it shouldn't be used for any other page. For example: 

{{subst:drv2
|page=File:Foo.png
|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 19#Foo.png
|article=Foo
|reason=
}} ~~~~
2.

Inform the editor who closed the deletion discussion by adding the following on their user talk page:

{{subst:DRV notice|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~
3.

For nominations to overturn and delete a page previously kept, attach <noinclude>{{Delrev|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude> to the top of the page under review to inform current editors about the discussion.

4.

Leave notice of the deletion review outside of and above the original deletion discussion:

  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is the same as the deletion review's section header, use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude>
  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is different from the deletion review's section header, then use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16|page=SECTION HEADER AT THE DELETION REVIEW LOG}}</noinclude>
 

Commenting in a deletion review

Any editor may express their opinion about an article or file being considered for deletion review. In the deletion review discussion, please type one of the following opinions preceded by an asterisk (*) and surrounded by three apostrophes (''') on either side. If you have additional thoughts to share, you may type this after the opinion. Place four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your entry, which should be placed below the entries of any previous editors:

  • Endorse the original closing decision; or
  • Relist on the relevant deletion forum (usually Articles for deletion); or
  • List, if the page was speedy deleted outside of the established criteria and you believe it needs a full discussion at the appropriate forum to decide if it should be deleted; or
  • Overturn the original decision and optionally an (action) per the Guide to deletion. For a keep decision, the default action associated with overturning is delete and vice versa. If an editor desires some action other than the default, they should make this clear; or
  • Allow recreation of the page if new information is presented and deemed sufficient to permit recreation.

Examples of opinions for an article that had been deleted:

  • *'''Endorse''' The original closing decision looks like it was sound, no reason shown here to overturn it. ~~~~
  • *'''Relist''' A new discussion at AfD should bring a more thorough discussion, given the new information shown here. ~~~~
  • *'''Allow recreation''' The new information provided looks like it justifies recreation of the article from scratch if there is anyone willing to do the work. ~~~~
  • *'''List''' Article was speedied without discussion, criteria given did not match the problem, full discussion at AfD looks warranted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and merge''' The article is a content fork, should have been merged into existing article on this topic rather than deleted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and userfy''' Needs more development in userspace before being published again, but the subject meets our notability criteria. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn''' Original deletion decision was not consistent with current policies. ~~~~

Remember that deletion review is not an opportunity to (re-)express your opinion on the content in question. It is an opportunity to correct errors in process (in the absence of significant new information), and thus the action specified should be the editor's feeling of the correct interpretation of the debate. Deletion review is facilitated by succinct discussions of policies and guidelines; long or repeated arguments are not generally helpful. Rather, editors should set out the key policies and guidelines supporting their preferred outcome.

The presentation of new information about the content should be prefaced by Relist, rather than Overturn and (action). This information can then be more fully evaluated in its proper deletion discussion forum. Allow recreation is an alternative in such cases.

Temporary undeletion

Admins participating in deletion reviews are routinely requested to restore deleted pages under review and replace the content with the {{TempUndelete}} template, leaving the history for review by everyone. However, copyright violations and violations of the policy on biographies of living persons should not be restored.

Closing reviews

A nominated page should remain on deletion review for at least seven days, unless the nomination was a proposed deletion. After seven days, an administrator will determine whether a consensus exists. If that consensus is to undelete, the admin should follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Administrator instructions. If the consensus was to relist, the page should be relisted at the appropriate forum. If the consensus was that the deletion was endorsed, the discussion should be closed with the consensus documented.

If the administrator closes the deletion review as no consensus, the outcome should generally be the same as if the decision was endorsed. However:

  • If the decision under appeal was a speedy deletion, the page(s) in question should be restored, as it indicates the deletion was not uncontroversial. The closer, or any editor, may then proceed to nominate the page at the appropriate deletion discussion forum, if they so choose.
  • If the decision under appeal was an XfD close, the closer may, at their discretion, relist the page(s) at the relevant XfD.

Ideally all closes should be made by an administrator to ensure that what is effectively the final appeal is applied consistently and fairly but in cases where the outcome is patently obvious or where a discussion has not been closed in good time it is permissible for a non-admin (ideally a DRV regular) to close discussions. Non-consensus closes should be avoided by non-admins unless they are absolutely unavoidable and the closer is sufficiently experienced at DRV to make that call. (Hint: if you are not sure that you have enough DRV experience then you don't.)

Speedy closes

  • Objections to a proposed deletion can be processed immediately as though they were a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
  • Where the closer of a deletion discussion realizes their close was wrong, and nobody has endorsed, the closer may speedily close as overturn. They should fully reverse their close, restoring any deleted pages if appropriate.
  • Where the nominator of a DRV wishes to withdraw their nomination, and nobody else has recommended any outcome other than endorse, the nominator may speedily close as "endorse" (or ask someone else to do so on their behalf).
  • Certain discussions may be closed without result if there is no prospect of success (e.g. disruptive or sockpuppet nominations, if the nominator is repeatedly nominating the same page, or the page is listed at WP:DEEPER). These will usually be marked as "administrative close".

23 July 2006

22 July 2006

21 July 2006

20 July 2006

19 July 2006

18 July 2006

Recently concluded

2006 July

  1. Image:Rivers_cuomo.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  2. Image:KarazhanInterior01.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  3. American Cliche - Deletion endorsed. 14:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  4. Trae - Deletion endorsed. 14:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  5. California State Normal School - Deletion endorsed. 14:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  6. Talk:Brian Peppers - talk page of deleted article; speedy closed. 15:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  7. Dennis Allen - Contested PROD; speedy restored. 15:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  8. Template:User NDP - Userfied per GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User NDP. 14:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  9. Template:User Socialist - Deletion endorsed; already userfied per GUS. 14:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  10. Articles for deletion - Leave as a redlink. 14:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  11. Zazz - Deletion endorsed. 14:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  12. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Frank Weltner - Speedy restored as clear error. 15:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  13. Punjabi Prison Match - Deletion endorsed. 14:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  14. Carleton Student Engineering Society - Deletion endorsed. 14:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  15. Encyclopedia Dramatica - Deletion endorsed. 15:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  16. Susan Fogarty - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 14:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  17. The Rabbit Joint - Deletion endorsed. 14:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  18. Mega Society - Deletion endorsed (New users, solicited votes were discounted.) 15:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  19. Corona Regis - Deletion endorsed. 15:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  20. Musa Cooper - Speedy deletion overturned; listed at AfD. 15:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  21. C-Tec - Contested PROD, restored and AfDed. 15:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  22. Angry Nintendo Nerd - Deletion endorsed. 15:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  23. Kingdom of Talossa - Deletion endorsed. 15:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  24. Victoria Crawford - Deletion endorsed. 15:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  25. Wikipedia:Jimbo makes mistakes - Listed at MfD; result was userfication. 16:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  26. Roger Maloney - Deletion endorsed. 16:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  27. Teutonic thrash - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  28. Template:Title - Speedy deletion overturned by original deleter. 16:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  29. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways or Category:Freeways and motorways - Closure of "no consensus" endorsed. 16:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  30. Question mark glitches in Pokémon - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  31. Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe - Deletion endorsed. 15:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  32. Pirate Party of the United States - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  33. Ampfea - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  34. TMNT Engine - Sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMNT Engine; Deleted by AfD. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  35. Tourette's Guy - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  36. King's Highway (Ontario) → List of Ontario provincial highways - relisted at RfD. 17:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  37. Joel Leyden - Deletion endorsed. 17:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  38. List of vegetarians - Deletion endorsed. 17:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  39. Jews did WTC - Deletion endorsed. 17:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  40. StarCraft units and structures - Deletion endorsed. 17:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  41. List of film clichés by genre - Deletion endorsed. 17:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  42. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  43. List of strike-breakers - Deletion endorsed. 17:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  44. Guitar World's 100 greatest guitar solos - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  45. Joseph Patrick Moore - Relisted at AfD. 14:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  46. Big Brother 7 chronology - Deletion endorsed. 14:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  47. File:Cat in the hat with a bong.jpg - Deletion endorsed. 14:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  48. Colorado Rockies (NHL) - Speedy restored by original deleter. 14:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  49. List of language speakers - Three late addition to a CfD (Catalan, Welsh, Latin) relisted; other deletions endorsed. 13:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  50. No personal attacks - Maintain status quo (redirect to Personal attacks.) 13:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  51. Bruce Shand - New recreation permitted by acclamation. 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  52. List of Sci Fi Channel (United States) programs - Restored; relisted for AfD. 16:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  53. Alyssa Miller - Disputed PROD restored, sent to AfD. 16:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  54. Michael Laitman - Deletion endorsed. 16:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  55. Eddit Merkleberger - speedy closed, kept deleted. Review 14:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  56. User:Riddley - Speedy restored; simple misunderstanding. 17:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review[reply]
  57. User:Micoolio101/Supporters_in_the_death_of_OrphanBot - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 17:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  58. myg0t - speedily closed due to a previous review closing only two hours prior. 19:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  59. Talifan - Consensus at DRV was to transwiki to wicktionary; however, article has been deleted there. Article will, thus, be listed for AfD (its first listing) as an alternative. 16:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  60. Club Penguin - Deletion endorsed. 16:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  61. Everywhere Girl - Deletion endorsed. 16:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  62. Kevin Zeese - Redirect result overturned; article restored (NB: This is merely an editorial decision; a consensus on the article's talk page is a better authority on this question than DRV.) 16:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  63. Department of Chemical Engineering & Technology - Deletion endorsed. 16:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  64. myg0t - Deletion endorsed. 16:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  65. Futuristic Sex Robotz - Deletion endorsed, without prejudiced to future DRV should circumstances change. 15:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  66. Various x-ns redirects to process pages - Deletion Overturned and relisted on RFD 03:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  67. Cyanide and Happiness - Deletion endorsed. 15:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  68. Kitty May Ellis - Keep closure overturned unanimously (including original closer), article deleted. 15:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  69. Aristasia - Deletion endorsed, without prejudice to properly sourced recreation. 15:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  70. First image on the Web - Overturned; relisted. 16:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  71. Lumber Cartel - Speedy keep result overturned; relisted. 16:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  72. Case of English pronouns - Redirect result overturned; relisted. 16:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  73. Doctor Who New Series 3 - Keep result overturned; since no single action after overturn had a consensus behind it, this is relisted. 16:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  74. Sharon Janis - Original deletion endorsed; rewrite submitted to new AfD. 15:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  75. Infoware - Keep closure endorsed. 15:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  76. Image:Popebenedettoencyclical.jpg - Keep closure overturned; image deleted as improper fair use. 22:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  77. Law School Ranking deletes - Deletion (as copyvio) endorsed. 22:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  78. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways - Relisted at CfD by original closer. 22:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  79. A Course in Miracles (book) - Recreation of redirect permitted. 22:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  80. King's Highway (Ontario) - Redirect restored. 22:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  81. Fucked Fucked Company - Deletion endorsed. 22:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  82. List of commercial seduction teachers - Deletion endorsed. 22:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  83. Vokzal - Deletion endorsed. 18:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  84. List_of_relationships_with_age_disparity - Deletion closure endorsed. 18:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  85. Freebord - PROD overturned; listed at AfD; kept at AfD. 18:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  86. Template:unblockabuse - Speedy keep closure endorsed. 18:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  87. Brilliant prose - History merged. 18:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  88. Template:Good article - Deletion endorsed. 17:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  89. OS 0 1 2 - Relisted at AfD. 17:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  90. Image_talk:Canada_flag_large.png - History merged. 17:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  91. Eon8 - Deletion endorsed. 17:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  92. Jim Weathers - Deletion endorsed. 17:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  93. LinkStation - Deletion endorsed. 17:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  94. Category:Women of Pakistan - Deletion overturned; relisted at CfD. 17:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  95. Pyongyang Hotel - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  96. Kat Shoob - Original deletion endorsed; new, different recreation now at AfD. 16:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  97. Cashville Records - Deletion endorsed. 16:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  98. Late Night Killers - Deletion endorsed. 16:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  99. What Really Happened - Deletion endorsed. 16:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  100. Sunday (David Bowie song) - Tiny minority endorsed closure, majority support for other action. Therefore, relisted at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday (David Bowie song) 22:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  101. Economic totalitarianism - back at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic totalitarianism (4th nomination) 15:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  102. Aaron Walton - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  103. Englewood Schools - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  104. Robin Fletcher - speedy deletion endorsed. 03:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  105. Nigga Know Technology - deletion endorsed. 03:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  106. Chinese Pig - deletion endorsed. 03:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  107. Ben Shuldiner - deletion endorsed. 02:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC) review
  108. List of United States musicians and sublists - undeleted and relisted on AfD. 12:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  109. Lumber Cartel - current AfD reopened, review speedily closed. Closure now subject of further DRV. 22:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  110. Articles for deletion - endorsed 14:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  111. Mark Steere - Author requested deletion. 16:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  112. Burnt Face Man - Deletion endorsed. 14:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  113. User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky - Userfied per WP:GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky. 13:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  114. Research_into_health_benefits_of_Falun_Gong - Deletion endorsed. 14:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  115. Barra binte Samawal - Undeleted, to be listed at AfD. 14:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  116. Piccolo (coloratura) - Contested Prod; undeleted, now at AfD. 14:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  117. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 14:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  118. An Offer You Can't Refuse - Deletion endorsed. 14:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  119. Arbor View High School - Improved recreation permitted. 18:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  120. Frank Morano - Deletion endorsed. 18:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  121. Names of cities in different languages - Deletion closures overturned. 18:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  122. RuneScape armour - No consensus closure endorsed. 17:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  123. Jesse B. Davis - Recreation reinstated at article title. 17:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  124. Sahaba's ancestors - Deletion endorsed. 16:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  125. Gilles Trehin - Unprotect, allow recreation. (Stub will put in place in meantime.) 16:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review

Archives

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Multimedia Information

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Header

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Content review

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Multimedia Information

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Contested prod

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/History only undeletion

Decisions to be reviewed

Shortcut

Instructions

Before listing a review request, please:

  1. Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer as this could resolve the matter more quickly. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision.
  2. Check that it is not on the list of perennial requests. Repeated requests every time some new, tiny snippet appears on the web have a tendency to be counter-productive. It is almost always best to play the waiting game unless you can decisively overcome the issues identified at deletion.

Steps to list a new deletion review

 
1.

Click here and paste the template skeleton at the top of the discussions (but not at the top of the page). Then fill in page with the name of the page, xfd_page with the name of the deletion discussion page (leave blank for speedy deletions), and reason with the reason why the discussion result should be changed. For media files, article is the name of the article where the file was used, and it shouldn't be used for any other page. For example: 

{{subst:drv2
|page=File:Foo.png
|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 19#Foo.png
|article=Foo
|reason=
}} ~~~~
2.

Inform the editor who closed the deletion discussion by adding the following on their user talk page:

{{subst:DRV notice|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~
3.

For nominations to overturn and delete a page previously kept, attach <noinclude>{{Delrev|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude> to the top of the page under review to inform current editors about the discussion.

4.

Leave notice of the deletion review outside of and above the original deletion discussion:

  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is the same as the deletion review's section header, use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude>
  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is different from the deletion review's section header, then use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16|page=SECTION HEADER AT THE DELETION REVIEW LOG}}</noinclude>
 

Commenting in a deletion review

Any editor may express their opinion about an article or file being considered for deletion review. In the deletion review discussion, please type one of the following opinions preceded by an asterisk (*) and surrounded by three apostrophes (''') on either side. If you have additional thoughts to share, you may type this after the opinion. Place four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your entry, which should be placed below the entries of any previous editors:

  • Endorse the original closing decision; or
  • Relist on the relevant deletion forum (usually Articles for deletion); or
  • List, if the page was speedy deleted outside of the established criteria and you believe it needs a full discussion at the appropriate forum to decide if it should be deleted; or
  • Overturn the original decision and optionally an (action) per the Guide to deletion. For a keep decision, the default action associated with overturning is delete and vice versa. If an editor desires some action other than the default, they should make this clear; or
  • Allow recreation of the page if new information is presented and deemed sufficient to permit recreation.

Examples of opinions for an article that had been deleted:

  • *'''Endorse''' The original closing decision looks like it was sound, no reason shown here to overturn it. ~~~~
  • *'''Relist''' A new discussion at AfD should bring a more thorough discussion, given the new information shown here. ~~~~
  • *'''Allow recreation''' The new information provided looks like it justifies recreation of the article from scratch if there is anyone willing to do the work. ~~~~
  • *'''List''' Article was speedied without discussion, criteria given did not match the problem, full discussion at AfD looks warranted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and merge''' The article is a content fork, should have been merged into existing article on this topic rather than deleted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and userfy''' Needs more development in userspace before being published again, but the subject meets our notability criteria. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn''' Original deletion decision was not consistent with current policies. ~~~~

Remember that deletion review is not an opportunity to (re-)express your opinion on the content in question. It is an opportunity to correct errors in process (in the absence of significant new information), and thus the action specified should be the editor's feeling of the correct interpretation of the debate. Deletion review is facilitated by succinct discussions of policies and guidelines; long or repeated arguments are not generally helpful. Rather, editors should set out the key policies and guidelines supporting their preferred outcome.

The presentation of new information about the content should be prefaced by Relist, rather than Overturn and (action). This information can then be more fully evaluated in its proper deletion discussion forum. Allow recreation is an alternative in such cases.

Temporary undeletion

Admins participating in deletion reviews are routinely requested to restore deleted pages under review and replace the content with the {{TempUndelete}} template, leaving the history for review by everyone. However, copyright violations and violations of the policy on biographies of living persons should not be restored.

Closing reviews

A nominated page should remain on deletion review for at least seven days, unless the nomination was a proposed deletion. After seven days, an administrator will determine whether a consensus exists. If that consensus is to undelete, the admin should follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Administrator instructions. If the consensus was to relist, the page should be relisted at the appropriate forum. If the consensus was that the deletion was endorsed, the discussion should be closed with the consensus documented.

If the administrator closes the deletion review as no consensus, the outcome should generally be the same as if the decision was endorsed. However:

  • If the decision under appeal was a speedy deletion, the page(s) in question should be restored, as it indicates the deletion was not uncontroversial. The closer, or any editor, may then proceed to nominate the page at the appropriate deletion discussion forum, if they so choose.
  • If the decision under appeal was an XfD close, the closer may, at their discretion, relist the page(s) at the relevant XfD.

Ideally all closes should be made by an administrator to ensure that what is effectively the final appeal is applied consistently and fairly but in cases where the outcome is patently obvious or where a discussion has not been closed in good time it is permissible for a non-admin (ideally a DRV regular) to close discussions. Non-consensus closes should be avoided by non-admins unless they are absolutely unavoidable and the closer is sufficiently experienced at DRV to make that call. (Hint: if you are not sure that you have enough DRV experience then you don't.)

Speedy closes

  • Objections to a proposed deletion can be processed immediately as though they were a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
  • Where the closer of a deletion discussion realizes their close was wrong, and nobody has endorsed, the closer may speedily close as overturn. They should fully reverse their close, restoring any deleted pages if appropriate.
  • Where the nominator of a DRV wishes to withdraw their nomination, and nobody else has recommended any outcome other than endorse, the nominator may speedily close as "endorse" (or ask someone else to do so on their behalf).
  • Certain discussions may be closed without result if there is no prospect of success (e.g. disruptive or sockpuppet nominations, if the nominator is repeatedly nominating the same page, or the page is listed at WP:DEEPER). These will usually be marked as "administrative close".

23 July 2006

22 July 2006

21 July 2006

20 July 2006

19 July 2006

18 July 2006

Recently concluded

2006 July

  1. Image:Rivers_cuomo.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  2. Image:KarazhanInterior01.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  3. American Cliche - Deletion endorsed. 14:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  4. Trae - Deletion endorsed. 14:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  5. California State Normal School - Deletion endorsed. 14:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  6. Talk:Brian Peppers - talk page of deleted article; speedy closed. 15:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  7. Dennis Allen - Contested PROD; speedy restored. 15:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  8. Template:User NDP - Userfied per GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User NDP. 14:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  9. Template:User Socialist - Deletion endorsed; already userfied per GUS. 14:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  10. Articles for deletion - Leave as a redlink. 14:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  11. Zazz - Deletion endorsed. 14:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  12. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Frank Weltner - Speedy restored as clear error. 15:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  13. Punjabi Prison Match - Deletion endorsed. 14:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  14. Carleton Student Engineering Society - Deletion endorsed. 14:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  15. Encyclopedia Dramatica - Deletion endorsed. 15:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  16. Susan Fogarty - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 14:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  17. The Rabbit Joint - Deletion endorsed. 14:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  18. Mega Society - Deletion endorsed (New users, solicited votes were discounted.) 15:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  19. Corona Regis - Deletion endorsed. 15:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  20. Musa Cooper - Speedy deletion overturned; listed at AfD. 15:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  21. C-Tec - Contested PROD, restored and AfDed. 15:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  22. Angry Nintendo Nerd - Deletion endorsed. 15:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  23. Kingdom of Talossa - Deletion endorsed. 15:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  24. Victoria Crawford - Deletion endorsed. 15:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  25. Wikipedia:Jimbo makes mistakes - Listed at MfD; result was userfication. 16:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  26. Roger Maloney - Deletion endorsed. 16:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  27. Teutonic thrash - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  28. Template:Title - Speedy deletion overturned by original deleter. 16:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  29. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways or Category:Freeways and motorways - Closure of "no consensus" endorsed. 16:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  30. Question mark glitches in Pokémon - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  31. Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe - Deletion endorsed. 15:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  32. Pirate Party of the United States - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  33. Ampfea - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  34. TMNT Engine - Sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMNT Engine; Deleted by AfD. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  35. Tourette's Guy - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  36. King's Highway (Ontario) → List of Ontario provincial highways - relisted at RfD. 17:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  37. Joel Leyden - Deletion endorsed. 17:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  38. List of vegetarians - Deletion endorsed. 17:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  39. Jews did WTC - Deletion endorsed. 17:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  40. StarCraft units and structures - Deletion endorsed. 17:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  41. List of film clichés by genre - Deletion endorsed. 17:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  42. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  43. List of strike-breakers - Deletion endorsed. 17:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  44. Guitar World's 100 greatest guitar solos - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  45. Joseph Patrick Moore - Relisted at AfD. 14:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  46. Big Brother 7 chronology - Deletion endorsed. 14:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  47. File:Cat in the hat with a bong.jpg - Deletion endorsed. 14:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  48. Colorado Rockies (NHL) - Speedy restored by original deleter. 14:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  49. List of language speakers - Three late addition to a CfD (Catalan, Welsh, Latin) relisted; other deletions endorsed. 13:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  50. No personal attacks - Maintain status quo (redirect to Personal attacks.) 13:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  51. Bruce Shand - New recreation permitted by acclamation. 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  52. List of Sci Fi Channel (United States) programs - Restored; relisted for AfD. 16:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  53. Alyssa Miller - Disputed PROD restored, sent to AfD. 16:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  54. Michael Laitman - Deletion endorsed. 16:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  55. Eddit Merkleberger - speedy closed, kept deleted. Review 14:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  56. User:Riddley - Speedy restored; simple misunderstanding. 17:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review[reply]
  57. User:Micoolio101/Supporters_in_the_death_of_OrphanBot - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 17:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  58. myg0t - speedily closed due to a previous review closing only two hours prior. 19:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  59. Talifan - Consensus at DRV was to transwiki to wicktionary; however, article has been deleted there. Article will, thus, be listed for AfD (its first listing) as an alternative. 16:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  60. Club Penguin - Deletion endorsed. 16:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  61. Everywhere Girl - Deletion endorsed. 16:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  62. Kevin Zeese - Redirect result overturned; article restored (NB: This is merely an editorial decision; a consensus on the article's talk page is a better authority on this question than DRV.) 16:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  63. Department of Chemical Engineering & Technology - Deletion endorsed. 16:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  64. myg0t - Deletion endorsed. 16:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  65. Futuristic Sex Robotz - Deletion endorsed, without prejudiced to future DRV should circumstances change. 15:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  66. Various x-ns redirects to process pages - Deletion Overturned and relisted on RFD 03:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  67. Cyanide and Happiness - Deletion endorsed. 15:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  68. Kitty May Ellis - Keep closure overturned unanimously (including original closer), article deleted. 15:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  69. Aristasia - Deletion endorsed, without prejudice to properly sourced recreation. 15:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  70. First image on the Web - Overturned; relisted. 16:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  71. Lumber Cartel - Speedy keep result overturned; relisted. 16:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  72. Case of English pronouns - Redirect result overturned; relisted. 16:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  73. Doctor Who New Series 3 - Keep result overturned; since no single action after overturn had a consensus behind it, this is relisted. 16:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  74. Sharon Janis - Original deletion endorsed; rewrite submitted to new AfD. 15:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  75. Infoware - Keep closure endorsed. 15:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  76. Image:Popebenedettoencyclical.jpg - Keep closure overturned; image deleted as improper fair use. 22:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  77. Law School Ranking deletes - Deletion (as copyvio) endorsed. 22:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  78. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways - Relisted at CfD by original closer. 22:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  79. A Course in Miracles (book) - Recreation of redirect permitted. 22:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  80. King's Highway (Ontario) - Redirect restored. 22:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  81. Fucked Fucked Company - Deletion endorsed. 22:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  82. List of commercial seduction teachers - Deletion endorsed. 22:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  83. Vokzal - Deletion endorsed. 18:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  84. List_of_relationships_with_age_disparity - Deletion closure endorsed. 18:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  85. Freebord - PROD overturned; listed at AfD; kept at AfD. 18:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  86. Template:unblockabuse - Speedy keep closure endorsed. 18:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  87. Brilliant prose - History merged. 18:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  88. Template:Good article - Deletion endorsed. 17:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  89. OS 0 1 2 - Relisted at AfD. 17:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  90. Image_talk:Canada_flag_large.png - History merged. 17:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  91. Eon8 - Deletion endorsed. 17:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  92. Jim Weathers - Deletion endorsed. 17:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  93. LinkStation - Deletion endorsed. 17:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  94. Category:Women of Pakistan - Deletion overturned; relisted at CfD. 17:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  95. Pyongyang Hotel - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  96. Kat Shoob - Original deletion endorsed; new, different recreation now at AfD. 16:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  97. Cashville Records - Deletion endorsed. 16:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  98. Late Night Killers - Deletion endorsed. 16:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  99. What Really Happened - Deletion endorsed. 16:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  100. Sunday (David Bowie song) - Tiny minority endorsed closure, majority support for other action. Therefore, relisted at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday (David Bowie song) 22:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  101. Economic totalitarianism - back at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic totalitarianism (4th nomination) 15:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  102. Aaron Walton - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  103. Englewood Schools - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  104. Robin Fletcher - speedy deletion endorsed. 03:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  105. Nigga Know Technology - deletion endorsed. 03:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  106. Chinese Pig - deletion endorsed. 03:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  107. Ben Shuldiner - deletion endorsed. 02:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC) review
  108. List of United States musicians and sublists - undeleted and relisted on AfD. 12:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  109. Lumber Cartel - current AfD reopened, review speedily closed. Closure now subject of further DRV. 22:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  110. Articles for deletion - endorsed 14:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  111. Mark Steere - Author requested deletion. 16:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  112. Burnt Face Man - Deletion endorsed. 14:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  113. User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky - Userfied per WP:GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky. 13:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  114. Research_into_health_benefits_of_Falun_Gong - Deletion endorsed. 14:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  115. Barra binte Samawal - Undeleted, to be listed at AfD. 14:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  116. Piccolo (coloratura) - Contested Prod; undeleted, now at AfD. 14:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  117. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 14:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  118. An Offer You Can't Refuse - Deletion endorsed. 14:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  119. Arbor View High School - Improved recreation permitted. 18:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  120. Frank Morano - Deletion endorsed. 18:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  121. Names of cities in different languages - Deletion closures overturned. 18:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  122. RuneScape armour - No consensus closure endorsed. 17:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  123. Jesse B. Davis - Recreation reinstated at article title. 17:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  124. Sahaba's ancestors - Deletion endorsed. 16:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  125. Gilles Trehin - Unprotect, allow recreation. (Stub will put in place in meantime.) 16:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review

Archives

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Header

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Content review

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Multimedia Information

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Contested prod

Template loop detected: Wikipedia:Deletion review/History only undeletion

Decisions to be reviewed

Shortcut

Instructions

Before listing a review request, please:

  1. Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer as this could resolve the matter more quickly. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision.
  2. Check that it is not on the list of perennial requests. Repeated requests every time some new, tiny snippet appears on the web have a tendency to be counter-productive. It is almost always best to play the waiting game unless you can decisively overcome the issues identified at deletion.

Steps to list a new deletion review

 
1.

Click here and paste the template skeleton at the top of the discussions (but not at the top of the page). Then fill in page with the name of the page, xfd_page with the name of the deletion discussion page (leave blank for speedy deletions), and reason with the reason why the discussion result should be changed. For media files, article is the name of the article where the file was used, and it shouldn't be used for any other page. For example: 

{{subst:drv2
|page=File:Foo.png
|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 19#Foo.png
|article=Foo
|reason=
}} ~~~~
2.

Inform the editor who closed the deletion discussion by adding the following on their user talk page:

{{subst:DRV notice|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~
3.

For nominations to overturn and delete a page previously kept, attach <noinclude>{{Delrev|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude> to the top of the page under review to inform current editors about the discussion.

4.

Leave notice of the deletion review outside of and above the original deletion discussion:

  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is the same as the deletion review's section header, use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude>
  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is different from the deletion review's section header, then use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16|page=SECTION HEADER AT THE DELETION REVIEW LOG}}</noinclude>
 

Commenting in a deletion review

Any editor may express their opinion about an article or file being considered for deletion review. In the deletion review discussion, please type one of the following opinions preceded by an asterisk (*) and surrounded by three apostrophes (''') on either side. If you have additional thoughts to share, you may type this after the opinion. Place four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your entry, which should be placed below the entries of any previous editors:

  • Endorse the original closing decision; or
  • Relist on the relevant deletion forum (usually Articles for deletion); or
  • List, if the page was speedy deleted outside of the established criteria and you believe it needs a full discussion at the appropriate forum to decide if it should be deleted; or
  • Overturn the original decision and optionally an (action) per the Guide to deletion. For a keep decision, the default action associated with overturning is delete and vice versa. If an editor desires some action other than the default, they should make this clear; or
  • Allow recreation of the page if new information is presented and deemed sufficient to permit recreation.

Examples of opinions for an article that had been deleted:

  • *'''Endorse''' The original closing decision looks like it was sound, no reason shown here to overturn it. ~~~~
  • *'''Relist''' A new discussion at AfD should bring a more thorough discussion, given the new information shown here. ~~~~
  • *'''Allow recreation''' The new information provided looks like it justifies recreation of the article from scratch if there is anyone willing to do the work. ~~~~
  • *'''List''' Article was speedied without discussion, criteria given did not match the problem, full discussion at AfD looks warranted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and merge''' The article is a content fork, should have been merged into existing article on this topic rather than deleted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and userfy''' Needs more development in userspace before being published again, but the subject meets our notability criteria. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn''' Original deletion decision was not consistent with current policies. ~~~~

Remember that deletion review is not an opportunity to (re-)express your opinion on the content in question. It is an opportunity to correct errors in process (in the absence of significant new information), and thus the action specified should be the editor's feeling of the correct interpretation of the debate. Deletion review is facilitated by succinct discussions of policies and guidelines; long or repeated arguments are not generally helpful. Rather, editors should set out the key policies and guidelines supporting their preferred outcome.

The presentation of new information about the content should be prefaced by Relist, rather than Overturn and (action). This information can then be more fully evaluated in its proper deletion discussion forum. Allow recreation is an alternative in such cases.

Temporary undeletion

Admins participating in deletion reviews are routinely requested to restore deleted pages under review and replace the content with the {{TempUndelete}} template, leaving the history for review by everyone. However, copyright violations and violations of the policy on biographies of living persons should not be restored.

Closing reviews

A nominated page should remain on deletion review for at least seven days, unless the nomination was a proposed deletion. After seven days, an administrator will determine whether a consensus exists. If that consensus is to undelete, the admin should follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Administrator instructions. If the consensus was to relist, the page should be relisted at the appropriate forum. If the consensus was that the deletion was endorsed, the discussion should be closed with the consensus documented.

If the administrator closes the deletion review as no consensus, the outcome should generally be the same as if the decision was endorsed. However:

  • If the decision under appeal was a speedy deletion, the page(s) in question should be restored, as it indicates the deletion was not uncontroversial. The closer, or any editor, may then proceed to nominate the page at the appropriate deletion discussion forum, if they so choose.
  • If the decision under appeal was an XfD close, the closer may, at their discretion, relist the page(s) at the relevant XfD.

Ideally all closes should be made by an administrator to ensure that what is effectively the final appeal is applied consistently and fairly but in cases where the outcome is patently obvious or where a discussion has not been closed in good time it is permissible for a non-admin (ideally a DRV regular) to close discussions. Non-consensus closes should be avoided by non-admins unless they are absolutely unavoidable and the closer is sufficiently experienced at DRV to make that call. (Hint: if you are not sure that you have enough DRV experience then you don't.)

Speedy closes

  • Objections to a proposed deletion can be processed immediately as though they were a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
  • Where the closer of a deletion discussion realizes their close was wrong, and nobody has endorsed, the closer may speedily close as overturn. They should fully reverse their close, restoring any deleted pages if appropriate.
  • Where the nominator of a DRV wishes to withdraw their nomination, and nobody else has recommended any outcome other than endorse, the nominator may speedily close as "endorse" (or ask someone else to do so on their behalf).
  • Certain discussions may be closed without result if there is no prospect of success (e.g. disruptive or sockpuppet nominations, if the nominator is repeatedly nominating the same page, or the page is listed at WP:DEEPER). These will usually be marked as "administrative close".

23 July 2006

22 July 2006

21 July 2006

20 July 2006

19 July 2006

18 July 2006

Recently concluded

2006 July

  1. Image:Rivers_cuomo.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  2. Image:KarazhanInterior01.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  3. American Cliche - Deletion endorsed. 14:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  4. Trae - Deletion endorsed. 14:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  5. California State Normal School - Deletion endorsed. 14:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  6. Talk:Brian Peppers - talk page of deleted article; speedy closed. 15:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  7. Dennis Allen - Contested PROD; speedy restored. 15:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  8. Template:User NDP - Userfied per GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User NDP. 14:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  9. Template:User Socialist - Deletion endorsed; already userfied per GUS. 14:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  10. Articles for deletion - Leave as a redlink. 14:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  11. Zazz - Deletion endorsed. 14:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  12. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Frank Weltner - Speedy restored as clear error. 15:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  13. Punjabi Prison Match - Deletion endorsed. 14:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  14. Carleton Student Engineering Society - Deletion endorsed. 14:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  15. Encyclopedia Dramatica - Deletion endorsed. 15:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  16. Susan Fogarty - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 14:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  17. The Rabbit Joint - Deletion endorsed. 14:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  18. Mega Society - Deletion endorsed (New users, solicited votes were discounted.) 15:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  19. Corona Regis - Deletion endorsed. 15:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  20. Musa Cooper - Speedy deletion overturned; listed at AfD. 15:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  21. C-Tec - Contested PROD, restored and AfDed. 15:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  22. Angry Nintendo Nerd - Deletion endorsed. 15:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  23. Kingdom of Talossa - Deletion endorsed. 15:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  24. Victoria Crawford - Deletion endorsed. 15:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  25. Wikipedia:Jimbo makes mistakes - Listed at MfD; result was userfication. 16:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  26. Roger Maloney - Deletion endorsed. 16:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  27. Teutonic thrash - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  28. Template:Title - Speedy deletion overturned by original deleter. 16:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  29. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways or Category:Freeways and motorways - Closure of "no consensus" endorsed. 16:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  30. Question mark glitches in Pokémon - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  31. Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe - Deletion endorsed. 15:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  32. Pirate Party of the United States - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  33. Ampfea - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  34. TMNT Engine - Sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMNT Engine; Deleted by AfD. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  35. Tourette's Guy - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  36. King's Highway (Ontario) → List of Ontario provincial highways - relisted at RfD. 17:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  37. Joel Leyden - Deletion endorsed. 17:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  38. List of vegetarians - Deletion endorsed. 17:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  39. Jews did WTC - Deletion endorsed. 17:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  40. StarCraft units and structures - Deletion endorsed. 17:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  41. List of film clichés by genre - Deletion endorsed. 17:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  42. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  43. List of strike-breakers - Deletion endorsed. 17:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  44. Guitar World's 100 greatest guitar solos - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  45. Joseph Patrick Moore - Relisted at AfD. 14:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  46. Big Brother 7 chronology - Deletion endorsed. 14:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  47. File:Cat in the hat with a bong.jpg - Deletion endorsed. 14:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  48. Colorado Rockies (NHL) - Speedy restored by original deleter. 14:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  49. List of language speakers - Three late addition to a CfD (Catalan, Welsh, Latin) relisted; other deletions endorsed. 13:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  50. No personal attacks - Maintain status quo (redirect to Personal attacks.) 13:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  51. Bruce Shand - New recreation permitted by acclamation. 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  52. List of Sci Fi Channel (United States) programs - Restored; relisted for AfD. 16:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  53. Alyssa Miller - Disputed PROD restored, sent to AfD. 16:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  54. Michael Laitman - Deletion endorsed. 16:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  55. Eddit Merkleberger - speedy closed, kept deleted. Review 14:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  56. User:Riddley - Speedy restored; simple misunderstanding. 17:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review[reply]
  57. User:Micoolio101/Supporters_in_the_death_of_OrphanBot - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 17:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  58. myg0t - speedily closed due to a previous review closing only two hours prior. 19:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  59. Talifan - Consensus at DRV was to transwiki to wicktionary; however, article has been deleted there. Article will, thus, be listed for AfD (its first listing) as an alternative. 16:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  60. Club Penguin - Deletion endorsed. 16:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  61. Everywhere Girl - Deletion endorsed. 16:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  62. Kevin Zeese - Redirect result overturned; article restored (NB: This is merely an editorial decision; a consensus on the article's talk page is a better authority on this question than DRV.) 16:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  63. Department of Chemical Engineering & Technology - Deletion endorsed. 16:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  64. myg0t - Deletion endorsed. 16:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  65. Futuristic Sex Robotz - Deletion endorsed, without prejudiced to future DRV should circumstances change. 15:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  66. Various x-ns redirects to process pages - Deletion Overturned and relisted on RFD 03:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  67. Cyanide and Happiness - Deletion endorsed. 15:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  68. Kitty May Ellis - Keep closure overturned unanimously (including original closer), article deleted. 15:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  69. Aristasia - Deletion endorsed, without prejudice to properly sourced recreation. 15:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  70. First image on the Web - Overturned; relisted. 16:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  71. Lumber Cartel - Speedy keep result overturned; relisted. 16:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  72. Case of English pronouns - Redirect result overturned; relisted. 16:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  73. Doctor Who New Series 3 - Keep result overturned; since no single action after overturn had a consensus behind it, this is relisted. 16:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  74. Sharon Janis - Original deletion endorsed; rewrite submitted to new AfD. 15:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  75. Infoware - Keep closure endorsed. 15:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  76. Image:Popebenedettoencyclical.jpg - Keep closure overturned; image deleted as improper fair use. 22:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  77. Law School Ranking deletes - Deletion (as copyvio) endorsed. 22:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  78. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways - Relisted at CfD by original closer. 22:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  79. A Course in Miracles (book) - Recreation of redirect permitted. 22:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  80. King's Highway (Ontario) - Redirect restored. 22:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  81. Fucked Fucked Company - Deletion endorsed. 22:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  82. List of commercial seduction teachers - Deletion endorsed. 22:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  83. Vokzal - Deletion endorsed. 18:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  84. List_of_relationships_with_age_disparity - Deletion closure endorsed. 18:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  85. Freebord - PROD overturned; listed at AfD; kept at AfD. 18:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  86. Template:unblockabuse - Speedy keep closure endorsed. 18:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  87. Brilliant prose - History merged. 18:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  88. Template:Good article - Deletion endorsed. 17:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  89. OS 0 1 2 - Relisted at AfD. 17:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  90. Image_talk:Canada_flag_large.png - History merged. 17:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  91. Eon8 - Deletion endorsed. 17:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  92. Jim Weathers - Deletion endorsed. 17:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  93. LinkStation - Deletion endorsed. 17:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  94. Category:Women of Pakistan - Deletion overturned; relisted at CfD. 17:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  95. Pyongyang Hotel - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  96. Kat Shoob - Original deletion endorsed; new, different recreation now at AfD. 16:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  97. Cashville Records - Deletion endorsed. 16:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  98. Late Night Killers - Deletion endorsed. 16:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  99. What Really Happened - Deletion endorsed. 16:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  100. Sunday (David Bowie song) - Tiny minority endorsed closure, majority support for other action. Therefore, relisted at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday (David Bowie song) 22:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  101. Economic totalitarianism - back at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic totalitarianism (4th nomination) 15:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  102. Aaron Walton - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  103. Englewood Schools - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  104. Robin Fletcher - speedy deletion endorsed. 03:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  105. Nigga Know Technology - deletion endorsed. 03:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  106. Chinese Pig - deletion endorsed. 03:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  107. Ben Shuldiner - deletion endorsed. 02:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC) review
  108. List of United States musicians and sublists - undeleted and relisted on AfD. 12:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  109. Lumber Cartel - current AfD reopened, review speedily closed. Closure now subject of further DRV. 22:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  110. Articles for deletion - endorsed 14:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  111. Mark Steere - Author requested deletion. 16:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  112. Burnt Face Man - Deletion endorsed. 14:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  113. User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky - Userfied per WP:GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky. 13:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  114. Research_into_health_benefits_of_Falun_Gong - Deletion endorsed. 14:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  115. Barra binte Samawal - Undeleted, to be listed at AfD. 14:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  116. Piccolo (coloratura) - Contested Prod; undeleted, now at AfD. 14:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  117. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 14:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  118. An Offer You Can't Refuse - Deletion endorsed. 14:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  119. Arbor View High School - Improved recreation permitted. 18:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  120. Frank Morano - Deletion endorsed. 18:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  121. Names of cities in different languages - Deletion closures overturned. 18:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  122. RuneScape armour - No consensus closure endorsed. 17:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  123. Jesse B. Davis - Recreation reinstated at article title. 17:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  124. Sahaba's ancestors - Deletion endorsed. 16:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  125. Gilles Trehin - Unprotect, allow recreation. (Stub will put in place in meantime.) 16:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review

Archives

Decisions to be reviewed

Shortcut

Instructions

Before listing a review request, please:

  1. Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer as this could resolve the matter more quickly. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision.
  2. Check that it is not on the list of perennial requests. Repeated requests every time some new, tiny snippet appears on the web have a tendency to be counter-productive. It is almost always best to play the waiting game unless you can decisively overcome the issues identified at deletion.

Steps to list a new deletion review

 
1.

Click here and paste the template skeleton at the top of the discussions (but not at the top of the page). Then fill in page with the name of the page, xfd_page with the name of the deletion discussion page (leave blank for speedy deletions), and reason with the reason why the discussion result should be changed. For media files, article is the name of the article where the file was used, and it shouldn't be used for any other page. For example: 

{{subst:drv2
|page=File:Foo.png
|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 19#Foo.png
|article=Foo
|reason=
}} ~~~~
2.

Inform the editor who closed the deletion discussion by adding the following on their user talk page:

{{subst:DRV notice|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~
3.

For nominations to overturn and delete a page previously kept, attach <noinclude>{{Delrev|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude> to the top of the page under review to inform current editors about the discussion.

4.

Leave notice of the deletion review outside of and above the original deletion discussion:

  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is the same as the deletion review's section header, use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16}}</noinclude>
  • If the deletion discussion's subpage name is different from the deletion review's section header, then use <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 16|page=SECTION HEADER AT THE DELETION REVIEW LOG}}</noinclude>
 

Commenting in a deletion review

Any editor may express their opinion about an article or file being considered for deletion review. In the deletion review discussion, please type one of the following opinions preceded by an asterisk (*) and surrounded by three apostrophes (''') on either side. If you have additional thoughts to share, you may type this after the opinion. Place four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your entry, which should be placed below the entries of any previous editors:

  • Endorse the original closing decision; or
  • Relist on the relevant deletion forum (usually Articles for deletion); or
  • List, if the page was speedy deleted outside of the established criteria and you believe it needs a full discussion at the appropriate forum to decide if it should be deleted; or
  • Overturn the original decision and optionally an (action) per the Guide to deletion. For a keep decision, the default action associated with overturning is delete and vice versa. If an editor desires some action other than the default, they should make this clear; or
  • Allow recreation of the page if new information is presented and deemed sufficient to permit recreation.

Examples of opinions for an article that had been deleted:

  • *'''Endorse''' The original closing decision looks like it was sound, no reason shown here to overturn it. ~~~~
  • *'''Relist''' A new discussion at AfD should bring a more thorough discussion, given the new information shown here. ~~~~
  • *'''Allow recreation''' The new information provided looks like it justifies recreation of the article from scratch if there is anyone willing to do the work. ~~~~
  • *'''List''' Article was speedied without discussion, criteria given did not match the problem, full discussion at AfD looks warranted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and merge''' The article is a content fork, should have been merged into existing article on this topic rather than deleted. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn and userfy''' Needs more development in userspace before being published again, but the subject meets our notability criteria. ~~~~
  • *'''Overturn''' Original deletion decision was not consistent with current policies. ~~~~

Remember that deletion review is not an opportunity to (re-)express your opinion on the content in question. It is an opportunity to correct errors in process (in the absence of significant new information), and thus the action specified should be the editor's feeling of the correct interpretation of the debate. Deletion review is facilitated by succinct discussions of policies and guidelines; long or repeated arguments are not generally helpful. Rather, editors should set out the key policies and guidelines supporting their preferred outcome.

The presentation of new information about the content should be prefaced by Relist, rather than Overturn and (action). This information can then be more fully evaluated in its proper deletion discussion forum. Allow recreation is an alternative in such cases.

Temporary undeletion

Admins participating in deletion reviews are routinely requested to restore deleted pages under review and replace the content with the {{TempUndelete}} template, leaving the history for review by everyone. However, copyright violations and violations of the policy on biographies of living persons should not be restored.

Closing reviews

A nominated page should remain on deletion review for at least seven days, unless the nomination was a proposed deletion. After seven days, an administrator will determine whether a consensus exists. If that consensus is to undelete, the admin should follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Administrator instructions. If the consensus was to relist, the page should be relisted at the appropriate forum. If the consensus was that the deletion was endorsed, the discussion should be closed with the consensus documented.

If the administrator closes the deletion review as no consensus, the outcome should generally be the same as if the decision was endorsed. However:

  • If the decision under appeal was a speedy deletion, the page(s) in question should be restored, as it indicates the deletion was not uncontroversial. The closer, or any editor, may then proceed to nominate the page at the appropriate deletion discussion forum, if they so choose.
  • If the decision under appeal was an XfD close, the closer may, at their discretion, relist the page(s) at the relevant XfD.

Ideally all closes should be made by an administrator to ensure that what is effectively the final appeal is applied consistently and fairly but in cases where the outcome is patently obvious or where a discussion has not been closed in good time it is permissible for a non-admin (ideally a DRV regular) to close discussions. Non-consensus closes should be avoided by non-admins unless they are absolutely unavoidable and the closer is sufficiently experienced at DRV to make that call. (Hint: if you are not sure that you have enough DRV experience then you don't.)

Speedy closes

  • Objections to a proposed deletion can be processed immediately as though they were a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
  • Where the closer of a deletion discussion realizes their close was wrong, and nobody has endorsed, the closer may speedily close as overturn. They should fully reverse their close, restoring any deleted pages if appropriate.
  • Where the nominator of a DRV wishes to withdraw their nomination, and nobody else has recommended any outcome other than endorse, the nominator may speedily close as "endorse" (or ask someone else to do so on their behalf).
  • Certain discussions may be closed without result if there is no prospect of success (e.g. disruptive or sockpuppet nominations, if the nominator is repeatedly nominating the same page, or the page is listed at WP:DEEPER). These will usually be marked as "administrative close".

23 July 2006

22 July 2006

21 July 2006

20 July 2006

19 July 2006

18 July 2006

Recently concluded

2006 July

  1. Image:Rivers_cuomo.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  2. Image:KarazhanInterior01.jpg - Speedy restored as clear error. 14:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  3. American Cliche - Deletion endorsed. 14:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  4. Trae - Deletion endorsed. 14:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  5. California State Normal School - Deletion endorsed. 14:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  6. Talk:Brian Peppers - talk page of deleted article; speedy closed. 15:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  7. Dennis Allen - Contested PROD; speedy restored. 15:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  8. Template:User NDP - Userfied per GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User NDP. 14:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  9. Template:User Socialist - Deletion endorsed; already userfied per GUS. 14:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  10. Articles for deletion - Leave as a redlink. 14:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  11. Zazz - Deletion endorsed. 14:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  12. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Frank Weltner - Speedy restored as clear error. 15:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  13. Punjabi Prison Match - Deletion endorsed. 14:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  14. Carleton Student Engineering Society - Deletion endorsed. 14:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  15. Encyclopedia Dramatica - Deletion endorsed. 15:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  16. Susan Fogarty - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 14:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  17. The Rabbit Joint - Deletion endorsed. 14:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  18. Mega Society - Deletion endorsed (New users, solicited votes were discounted.) 15:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  19. Corona Regis - Deletion endorsed. 15:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  20. Musa Cooper - Speedy deletion overturned; listed at AfD. 15:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  21. C-Tec - Contested PROD, restored and AfDed. 15:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  22. Angry Nintendo Nerd - Deletion endorsed. 15:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  23. Kingdom of Talossa - Deletion endorsed. 15:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  24. Victoria Crawford - Deletion endorsed. 15:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  25. Wikipedia:Jimbo makes mistakes - Listed at MfD; result was userfication. 16:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  26. Roger Maloney - Deletion endorsed. 16:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  27. Teutonic thrash - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  28. Template:Title - Speedy deletion overturned by original deleter. 16:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  29. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways or Category:Freeways and motorways - Closure of "no consensus" endorsed. 16:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  30. Question mark glitches in Pokémon - Deletion endorsed. 15:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  31. Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe - Deletion endorsed. 15:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  32. Pirate Party of the United States - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  33. Ampfea - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  34. TMNT Engine - Sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMNT Engine; Deleted by AfD. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  35. Tourette's Guy - Kept deleted. 02:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  36. King's Highway (Ontario) → List of Ontario provincial highways - relisted at RfD. 17:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  37. Joel Leyden - Deletion endorsed. 17:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  38. List of vegetarians - Deletion endorsed. 17:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  39. Jews did WTC - Deletion endorsed. 17:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  40. StarCraft units and structures - Deletion endorsed. 17:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  41. List of film clichés by genre - Deletion endorsed. 17:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  42. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  43. List of strike-breakers - Deletion endorsed. 17:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  44. Guitar World's 100 greatest guitar solos - Deletion as copyvio endorsed. 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  45. Joseph Patrick Moore - Relisted at AfD. 14:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  46. Big Brother 7 chronology - Deletion endorsed. 14:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  47. File:Cat in the hat with a bong.jpg - Deletion endorsed. 14:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  48. Colorado Rockies (NHL) - Speedy restored by original deleter. 14:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  49. List of language speakers - Three late addition to a CfD (Catalan, Welsh, Latin) relisted; other deletions endorsed. 13:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  50. No personal attacks - Maintain status quo (redirect to Personal attacks.) 13:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  51. Bruce Shand - New recreation permitted by acclamation. 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  52. List of Sci Fi Channel (United States) programs - Restored; relisted for AfD. 16:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  53. Alyssa Miller - Disputed PROD restored, sent to AfD. 16:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  54. Michael Laitman - Deletion endorsed. 16:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  55. Eddit Merkleberger - speedy closed, kept deleted. Review 14:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  56. User:Riddley - Speedy restored; simple misunderstanding. 17:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review[reply]
  57. User:Micoolio101/Supporters_in_the_death_of_OrphanBot - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 17:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  58. myg0t - speedily closed due to a previous review closing only two hours prior. 19:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  59. Talifan - Consensus at DRV was to transwiki to wicktionary; however, article has been deleted there. Article will, thus, be listed for AfD (its first listing) as an alternative. 16:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  60. Club Penguin - Deletion endorsed. 16:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  61. Everywhere Girl - Deletion endorsed. 16:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  62. Kevin Zeese - Redirect result overturned; article restored (NB: This is merely an editorial decision; a consensus on the article's talk page is a better authority on this question than DRV.) 16:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  63. Department of Chemical Engineering & Technology - Deletion endorsed. 16:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  64. myg0t - Deletion endorsed. 16:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  65. Futuristic Sex Robotz - Deletion endorsed, without prejudiced to future DRV should circumstances change. 15:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  66. Various x-ns redirects to process pages - Deletion Overturned and relisted on RFD 03:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  67. Cyanide and Happiness - Deletion endorsed. 15:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  68. Kitty May Ellis - Keep closure overturned unanimously (including original closer), article deleted. 15:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  69. Aristasia - Deletion endorsed, without prejudice to properly sourced recreation. 15:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  70. First image on the Web - Overturned; relisted. 16:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  71. Lumber Cartel - Speedy keep result overturned; relisted. 16:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  72. Case of English pronouns - Redirect result overturned; relisted. 16:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  73. Doctor Who New Series 3 - Keep result overturned; since no single action after overturn had a consensus behind it, this is relisted. 16:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  74. Sharon Janis - Original deletion endorsed; rewrite submitted to new AfD. 15:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  75. Infoware - Keep closure endorsed. 15:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  76. Image:Popebenedettoencyclical.jpg - Keep closure overturned; image deleted as improper fair use. 22:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  77. Law School Ranking deletes - Deletion (as copyvio) endorsed. 22:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  78. Category:Limited-access roads to Category:Freeways - Relisted at CfD by original closer. 22:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  79. A Course in Miracles (book) - Recreation of redirect permitted. 22:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  80. King's Highway (Ontario) - Redirect restored. 22:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  81. Fucked Fucked Company - Deletion endorsed. 22:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  82. List of commercial seduction teachers - Deletion endorsed. 22:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  83. Vokzal - Deletion endorsed. 18:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  84. List_of_relationships_with_age_disparity - Deletion closure endorsed. 18:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  85. Freebord - PROD overturned; listed at AfD; kept at AfD. 18:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  86. Template:unblockabuse - Speedy keep closure endorsed. 18:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  87. Brilliant prose - History merged. 18:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  88. Template:Good article - Deletion endorsed. 17:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  89. OS 0 1 2 - Relisted at AfD. 17:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  90. Image_talk:Canada_flag_large.png - History merged. 17:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  91. Eon8 - Deletion endorsed. 17:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  92. Jim Weathers - Deletion endorsed. 17:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  93. LinkStation - Deletion endorsed. 17:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  94. Category:Women of Pakistan - Deletion overturned; relisted at CfD. 17:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  95. Pyongyang Hotel - Deletion endorsed. 17:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  96. Kat Shoob - Original deletion endorsed; new, different recreation now at AfD. 16:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  97. Cashville Records - Deletion endorsed. 16:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  98. Late Night Killers - Deletion endorsed. 16:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  99. What Really Happened - Deletion endorsed. 16:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  100. Sunday (David Bowie song) - Tiny minority endorsed closure, majority support for other action. Therefore, relisted at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday (David Bowie song) 22:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  101. Economic totalitarianism - back at AfD. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic totalitarianism (4th nomination) 15:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  102. Aaron Walton - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  103. Englewood Schools - deletion endorsed. 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  104. Robin Fletcher - speedy deletion endorsed. 03:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  105. Nigga Know Technology - deletion endorsed. 03:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  106. Chinese Pig - deletion endorsed. 03:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  107. Ben Shuldiner - deletion endorsed. 02:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC) review
  108. List of United States musicians and sublists - undeleted and relisted on AfD. 12:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  109. Lumber Cartel - current AfD reopened, review speedily closed. Closure now subject of further DRV. 22:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  110. Articles for deletion - endorsed 14:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  111. Mark Steere - Author requested deletion. 16:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  112. Burnt Face Man - Deletion endorsed. 14:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  113. User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky - Userfied per WP:GUS to User:Xoloz/UBX/User Zhirinovsky. 13:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  114. Research_into_health_benefits_of_Falun_Gong - Deletion endorsed. 14:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  115. Barra binte Samawal - Undeleted, to be listed at AfD. 14:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  116. Piccolo (coloratura) - Contested Prod; undeleted, now at AfD. 14:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  117. Lostpedia - Deletion endorsed unanimously. 14:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  118. An Offer You Can't Refuse - Deletion endorsed. 14:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  119. Arbor View High School - Improved recreation permitted. 18:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  120. Frank Morano - Deletion endorsed. 18:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  121. Names of cities in different languages - Deletion closures overturned. 18:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  122. RuneScape armour - No consensus closure endorsed. 17:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  123. Jesse B. Davis - Recreation reinstated at article title. 17:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  124. Sahaba's ancestors - Deletion endorsed. 16:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review
  125. Gilles Trehin - Unprotect, allow recreation. (Stub will put in place in meantime.) 16:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Review

Archives

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review&oldid=65344574"