Jump to content

Mainline Protestant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 132.159.147.77 (talk) at 14:40, 18 October 2004 (sectionalized and then edited para so it doesn't sound like mainlines think the bible is a bunch of reinterpretable bulls#$&). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In the United States, the Mainline churches are those Protestant denominations with moderate theologies which attempt to be open to new ideas and societal changes without abandoning what they consider to be the historical basis of the Christian faith. They are neither ultra-liberal groups such as the Unitarian Universalist church is, nor fundamentalist in their beliefs. These groups have been more open to demands for the ordination of women. They have been far from uniform in their reaction to the homosexual rights movement, but have not rejected it out of hand in the way that it has been by the Catholic church and the more conservative Protestant churches. They take a moderate view with regards to military service – all provide chaplains to the U.S. Armed Forces and none are historically peace churches except possibly the Church of the Brethren – but all express reservations about aggressive use of miltary force for any reason.


The hallmark of the mainline churches would seemlingly be moderation. Only a few members or ministers in them would condemn the use of alcohol in moderation. Their theologies tend to be moderate and influenced, consciously or not, by the higher criticism. Most ministers and most members seem to be comfortable with modern-language translations of the Bible.

The nature of Biblical Truth

Most mainline traditions follow the traditional Christian belief in the triune nature of God, but do not necessarily require acceptance of everything either stated about Jesus or claimed as having been said by him in the New Testament, especially the statements to the effect that he represented the sole legitimate path to God. Few would suggest that either Testament was verbally and plenarily inspired, that is, the result of God through the Holy Spirit directly dictating his revealed word to human authors, as more conservative groups generally maintain. While many, perhaps most, members of mainline churches accept the Virgin Birth of Jesus, few would actually make such acceptance a requisite for membership or a position to which others must necessarily be bound. Ignorance concerning the precise circumstances surrounding the creaton of the Bible leads to a lot of speculation as to how the words in it should be interpreted. There is a general consensus that Scripture, while very important, must both be interpreted through the lens of the cultures in which it was originally written, and examined, like everything else, using God-given reason. There is a general acknowledgement of the possibility that that many Scriptures may date from a time later than that which they would seem to claim for themselves and that in some instances that most or the bulk of the words of many books, particularly in the Old Testament, may have been the work of later authors and editors rather than the purported traditional authors. Thus the denominations acknowledge truth eminating from the Bible but are at a loss as to describing the form that truth must take.

Black mainline question

There is some discussion about whether historically black denominations sharing the beliefs stated above are truly "mainline" churches. Some argue that they are not, since blacks were tradtionally excluded from "mainline" society in the United States, and that is in fact why these denominations even exist. Many proponents of racial desegregation feel that these shared beliefs mean that traditionally black churches can indeed be "mainline" and that moderate black Protestant denominations are indeed part of this identity.

Use of the term mainline

The term "mainline" can be controversial in that it tends to be used with derision by more conservative critics, who see it as being synonymous with "liberal", which they also use pejoratively. These critics often point, with scarcely concealed glee, at the loss of membership in most of the "mainline" churches in recent decades.

The inclusion of a church in the "mainline" does not imply that the beliefs common to "mainline" churches are held in common by every member of these churches or even every member of their clergy. All of them allow a considerable theological lattitude, and each of them contains within it a Confessing Movement or "renewal movement" which is more conservative in tone. Another important fact is that not every church with a name similar to a mainline church should necessarily be deemed to be "mainline", although in most instances there are historical ties between such groups. For example, the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod and the Presbyterian Church in America are probably too conservative to be regarded as "mainline" in the sense contemplated here.

Denominations

Broadly speaking, the larger U.S. mainline churches are:


The United Methodist Church
The Episcopal Church
The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
The United Church of Christ
The Presbyterian Church (USA)
The Church of the Brethren
The Disciples of Christ
The American Baptist Churches USA

Black denominations most likely to be identified as mainline are the larger Methodist ones, the African Methodist Episcopal Church, the AME Zion Church, and the Christian Methodist Episcopal Church.

The UMC, Episcopal Church, UCC, PCUSA, Disciples, AME Church, and AME Zion Church are all members of Churches Uniting in Christ, which is an effort to coordinate their works to prevent needless duplications of effort and animosity, and to view each other as valid Christians participating in the Universal Church's mission of spreading the message of the hope of salvation; many hope that this will serve as a prelude to a merged national "superdenomination" somewhat analgous to the United Church of Canada. Additionally, the ELCA is "partner in mission and dialogue" to this movement, albeit not as of 2004 a full member of it.