Jump to content

Talk:Monarda didyma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.5.251.86 (talk) at 13:51, 26 July 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPlants Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WP1.0

incorrect image

I don't think that the attached image is of Monarda didyma. A clue is that the pictured flower is not scarlet in color, but the shape is wrong too. Here's one that I believe is correct, but it's not a free image: http://www.debhebert.com/LgPhotos/beebalm.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leotohill (talkcontribs) 01:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Winnebago" don't call themselves that any more. They took back their own name: Ho Chunk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.33.4 (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article mentions that the plants were used by the Blackfoot native americans, but the range of the plant does not show that it was present where the Blackfoot were. The section about it might properly be moved to the page on the Monarda genus?