Talk:Video production

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Video production article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Caprockranger (talk · contribs) / Video production Video production This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

comment

Hmm, there's an edit to this article dated 30th of Jan that has my name to it... but which I definitely did not make! My password wasn't an easy one to crack... but I'll change it anyway.

It was the same text added by 67.123.17.43 on 2nd Dec, 2005: "blackpeple rule". Curious. Poweroid 16:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

This article appears to be more of a link farm than a real article with good information. I'm deleting the links to production companies.

I removed the following links to production companies from the article. Danielbot 08:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality

I'm afraid this is a very poor article: vague, sketchy, and inaccurate (by definition, a video production company does not "film.") Also, video production is moving aggressively into the broadcast/cable and theatrical areas that were once exclusively film.

I suggest: --Create a brief new article that is at least more accurate and substantive. --Monitor the rapid and bewildering changes in the film/video/TV world until both technologies and business models mature and settle down.Jim Stinson 22:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.videomaker.com/learn/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:12, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Challenged Material

In the first paragraph it states, without any reference, "It is the equivalent of filmmaking, but with images recorded electronically instead of film stock." Modern films do not use film stock much like they used to. In fact, most analog mediums, like film stock and VHS tapes, are basically obsolete in this digital era. This statement is not necessarily valid, it's not modern, and it has no sources or references. I am challenging it to be changed, or I will change it myself if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.19.96 (talk) 22:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Distance Education

The paragraphs concerning distance education, particularly through Internet broadcast are written poorly. "Students were able to watch the underwater archaeology in real time and ask questions of the scientists exploring the shipwreck. The twice-daily live distance learning programs reached an estimated 1600 students from as far away as Canada during the five days of broadcasting." Online education (internet education, such as Khan Academy) can be considered distance-learning, but "as far away as Canada" is inaccurate, and oddly written as anyone with the link (assuming there are no geo-restrictions) could view the content. It is not as if it is distance learning offered through mail which only caters to the United States, and parts of Canada. --Lumpy Berserk (talk) 04:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]