Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Di-Cypher
Appearance
- Di-Cypher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Heavily promotional article of a newly formed company of questionable notability. The sources are mainly primary (the companies own website, or self entries) with the only one of any interest (CNN) does not even mention the company. Claims are not supported by any reliable third party references. This article had been heavily tagged with issues (advert, coi, peacock, primary sources, one source, disputed) by more than one editor including a speedy by myself but the result was just a continuous deletion of tags without any attempt to address the issue. Tag deletion is not a reason for AfD I know just the timing.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA article on a company. Nothing on Highbeam or Questia, Google just returns the usual social media. A company going about its business; some encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 19:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Don't Delete: A WP:SPA article on a company. Google returns the social media with celebrities and fighters using the company. A company going about its business; some encyclopaedic notability. Comoncents85 (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)