User talk:Mdann52

This is Mdann52's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Mdann52
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Avoid personal attacks For disputes, seek dispute resolution

Template:Archive box collapsible

This is Mdann52's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34: 7 days

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Trustpilot shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrightYellowSun (talk • contribs) 14:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

University of Bolton

Thanks for your message, I have emailed Wikipedia giving permission for the copyright to be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatashambles1717 (talk • contribs) 11:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trustpilot

You have wrongly deleted all of my valid edits without offering an explanation. I did not go to the trouble of making them just to have an uninformed person like you delete them. You have violated Wikipedia's policies. Please do not make additional edits without first discussing them on the article's talk page.--BrightYellowSun (talk) 15:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you honestly believe that "is a online review site" is proper grammar?--BrightYellowSun (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BrightYellowSun: in that case, let's discuss them here. I've said why I think your edits are inappropriate - why do you think mine are? Your edits appear to be against WP:NPOV, despite the fact there are negetive sources in the article, many more positive ones exist (for example, [1] and [2]). Personally, it seems you have a bias against them - so you may not be the best person to be editing this entry. Mdann52 (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Trustpilot. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 22:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

Tech News: 2015-52

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Tech News

Because of the holidays, the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 11 January 2016.
The writers of the technical newsletter are asking for your opinion. Did you get the information you wanted this year? Did we miss important technical news in 2015? What kind of information was too late? Please tell us! You can write in your language. Thank you!

Recent changes

CompletionSuggester is a new suggestions algorithm for Search. It is available as a Beta feature since 17 December. (more information)
The Multimedia team is running an A/B test for the cross-wiki upload tool. They are testing four different interfaces. The test is running from 16-23 December. (more information)

Changes this week

There is no deployment of MediaWiki scheduled until 12 January 2016 (calendar).

Meetings

Should administrators and other users with advanced tools need stronger passwords? You can discuss about it in a Request for Comments.
No meeting with the VisualEditor team on 22 and 29 December, and 5 January.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

20:34:36, 21 December 2015 review of submission by 2.28.93.248

Quattrostagioni (talk · contribs)
- Draft:3G Boss (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User:Mdann52 I've added some secondary sources to prove notability and I have significantly added to the article content including details of specific episodes, increasing credibility. This reality show is a big thing for the local community, and has achieved lots of views in its first few episodes. All content relating to specific episodes are verifiable from the actual shows, and I have cited these as primary AV media sources. Could you now approve the draft article and move it to the main encyclopedia please?

Page on Dr. M.M Alex

Just wanted to thank you for helping me out with the page Matt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Basilmathew92/Draft. I will definitely work on the draft and make it review worthy. Thanks again.

Basilmathew92Basilmathew92 (talk) 06:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basilmathew92 (talk • contribs) 06:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Matt, I have added an info box, wikilinks, and made a few spell checks on the page. Could you kindly go through the new draft and tell me what I should rectify further.

Thank you, Basilmathew92Basilmathew92 (talk) 06:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basilmathew92 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]