Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Cinque

Vincenzo Cinque

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no indication of notability. Article created by an indef-blocked editor with a history of fabrication and suspected hoaxes (see, e.g., this and this), so the one source in the article cannot be accepted in good faith (the external link has no mention of Cinque). Not in Benezit, no relevant hits (that I can see) on Scholar, JSTOR and so on. He cannot be the Neapolitan goldsmith mentioned here, as he was 11 when that was published. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Justlettersandnumbers. Mduvekot (talk) 14:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 17:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 17:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this would imaginably be acceptable but there are no further convincing signs of an article. SwisterTwister talk 23:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why delete? the source is in bibliography and are notable the napolitan Italian sculpture school. is not an hoaxing.

--79.24.143.198 (talk) 12:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

is acceptable, convincing sings?

http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/lot/scuola-napoletana-secoli-xix-xx-cinque-sculture-in-4011259-details.aspx?pos=126&intObjectID=4011259&sid= --79.24.143.198 (talk) 12:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]